Profile image
By fousesquawk (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

The 9th Circuit Out of Control

Thursday, February 9, 2017 19:41
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

A couple of hours ago, the three judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court based in San Francisco) ruled unanimously to uphold the order of their colleague James Robart that suspended President Trump’s travel ban from seven countries.

Full disclosure: I am not an attorney, but I feel strongly that this is a decision that cries out for a reversal by the Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit, which is the most liberal and most-reversed in the country, has overstepped its bounds. Regardless what you think about the wisdom of Trump’s action, he is within his power to  exercise this action. It is covered quite clearly under Title 8 US Code Chapter 12, 1182 (f)

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.”


So along come the attorneys general of Minnesota and Washington who go to the 9th Circuit, which covers the latter state. They claim that their states would be harmed by the ruling, a very dubious claim to standing in the first place. One judge issues a stay and the three-judge panel upholds his ruling. Given the liberal dominance of the 9th Circuit, I am not surprised.

What this court is saying is to Hell with the President’s authority (as outlined above) to take such action for our national security. To Hell with whatever intelligence he has been furnished by his intelligence agencies to support such action. What’s important-more important than our national security – is the constitutional rights of people sitting in Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Sudan- Their right to come to the US-a right that does not exist. The judges don’t like Trump’s actions, so they are trying to make up the law to overturn it.

So what happens now? Trump can try to re-do the order to try and please this renegade court or he can go to the Supreme Court. Would the 4 liberal judges go along with the 9th Circuit, or would they have enough sense to know that the SC could not possibly support this decision when the law is so clear? If the SC winds up in a 4-4 tie, the 9th Circuit ruling stands and the President of the US is hamstrung in trying to control the jihadis coming here. (The issue will probably be settled  by the time Neil Gorsuch is confirmed.) What a disgraceful judicial action.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.