Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Do We have a Justice Dept or Not?

Saturday, September 23, 2017 11:46
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

 

By J. Marsolo  /  American Thinker

During the past few weeks, we have confirmed what we suspected.  The Comey investigation of the Hillary email “matter” was a sham.  We knew that Comey did not call for a grand jury, did not issue subpoenas, and granted immunity to most of Hillary’s pals.  Loretta Lynch told Comey to use the word “matter” instead of “investigation,” and Lynch met with Bill Clinton days before the FBI questioned Hillary.  But now we know that Comey wrote the exoneration letter before he interviewed Hillary and before he completed the sham investigation.  Now we know why Comey did not put Hillary under oath when questioned.  There was no point to it, since he had already decided to give her a pass.  And not putting her under oath saved the additional problem that Hillary would naturally lie under oath, which would have required Comey to explain that Hillary lying under oath to the FBI was done without intent.

Now we know that Trump was correct when he said his lines at Trump Tower were “wiretapped.” Maybe he did not use the exact language required, but everyone knew the meaning of Trump’s charge.  James Clapper knew but lied by saying there was no FISA warrant.

Comey knew but lied when he said there was no wiretapping of Trump.

Clapper and Comey knew there was a FISA warrant for Paul Manafort at Trump Tower.  They knew that Manafort had worked as Trump’s campaign manager and knew that the surveillance must have picked up Manafort speaking with Trump.  Yet both insisted they knew of no such evidence.  They both parsed words, in the best spirit of Bill Clinton parsing the meaning of “is” and “alone,” not to answer fully and honestly.

The news about the FISA warrants on Manafort must have been leaked by Mueller’s office; otherwise, how would we know about it?  Mueller is clearly focused on Manafort, as evidenced by the morning raid with a no-knock search of Manafort’s house.  A no-knock warrant allows the police to enter without knocking or notice and is used when there is a probability that evidence will be destroyed between the time you knock on the door and the door’s being opened.  This is typical when the area subject to search contains drugs that may be flushed.  But Manafort’s warrant was for computers and documents that cannot be destroyed between the time of the knock and the entering, unless Mueller suspected that Manafort had taken Hillary’s advice to scrub the computers with BleachBit.  Imagine if Comey had investigated Hillary as Mueller is investigating Manafort.

It is a crime to leak a FISA warrant.  Manafort has called for the Justice Department to investigate the leak and the reasons for the warrant.

We have also learned that Susan Rice and Samantha Power, both Obama political appointees, were unmasking the identities of numerous Americans from intelligence reports.

This information requires an investigation by the Justice Department, with professional prosecutors, a grand jury, and subpoenas – in other words, a real investigation like Mueller’s, not like the Comey investigation of Hillary.

The Hillary email matter must be investigated because of the importance of what she did, but more importantly for the reasons why Comey acted as he did.  Simply stated, there was no real investigation of Hillary.  The abuse of the surveillance to unmask the identities of Americans must be investigated.  The reasons for the wiretaps on Manafort that ensnared Trump must be investigated.

But while Mueller is aggressively pursuing whatever it is he is investigating, spending millions, and creating his own justice department, our attorney general is missing in action.   Meanwhile, Hillary is peddling her book, appearing on any TV show that will have her, attacking President Trump at every opportunity, and laughing at us because she escaped prosecution. 

Attorney General Sessions made a yuge mistake in recusing himself from the “Russia” investigation, which led to the appointment of Mueller.  He should have notified Trump that he would recuse himself so Trump could have appointed someone who is not afraid of the Democrats and their cheerleaders in the media.  Sessions had a distinguished career as a senator and federal prosecutor, but his recusal and failure to investigate, especially the sham Hillary investigation, are inexplicable.

If Sessions does not wish to do his sworn duties, he should resign, or appoint a special prosecutor who will follow the law.   Either we have a nation of laws or we do not.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/09/do_we_have_a_justice_department_or_not.html#ixzz4tWpR13gk

Read more great articles here: http://americanthinker.com 
 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 7 comments
  • Don - 1

    Its been horrifically compromised for the past 50 years…. Most of the Courts are populated by crypto commies. The 9th Circuit is a prime example.

  • burned handle

    no, we do not have a justice department in this country – we only have an in-justice department that lets real criminals go, punishes law abiding citizens, and is intent on over throwing the entire country.

    • Man

      No that is called a heavy dose if bias. If there are law abiding citizens then there should be no proof to be proven guilty. That is how justice works

      • 2QIK4U

        What’s bias is a current president that relied and won on Wikileaks facts and still hasn’t pardoned the person that put him in the white house. Two thirds are corrupt and we have “paused” the criminals now so if action isn’t taken the planet is screwed.

  • 2QIK4U

    This person is a top level pedophile and child stealer. I feel that he is just as bad if not more sadistic than Obama. He is exactly like number two from Dr evils henchmen out of Austin powers

    • b4

      if your talking about trump then your the only one who is whacked–and full of shit–so now everybody will ignore anything you post you idiot kee wee puny piss ant fool=what a jackass you are–you just insulted about 100 million americans who support trump you fool–go work for cnn–your country is nothing but maggots anyway–go to hell

  • Royal Payne

    No ! We have not had a trustworthy DOJ for several past administrations. This did not start with Obama, however he did take it to an entirely new level. We have been sold out by both political parties for exactly the same reasons, both have the same agenda just different ways of achieving their goal. They do not want to govern, they want to rule and it appears many Americans actually want Fascism/Communism with the government taking care of their every need. We are already close to the point of having more takers than producers, when that happens, it’s all over. Just ask Venezuela if you don’t believe this, it’s happening to them now.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.