Aurora Massacre: Another Effort to Discredit Growing Suspicion of the Official Story

by Scott Creighton

The recently released Motion to Intervene supposedly from a victim of the Aurora Massacre is as fake as the Sorcha Faal “LIBOR” connection and the various Jonathan Lee Riches scams. But there’s a lot to be learned from this obviously desperate attempt to discredit the ongoing unofficial investigation of the Century 16 massacre. It infers that the victims are all “government actors” and prostitutes and claims the police chief and lead prosecutor blackmailed a victim into perjuring himself then shot him at his home. Key to this fraud is the fact that it names Phillip Anschutz as being behind all of this and that is clearly designed to discredit various unofficial investigations which have come to a similar conclusion.

Aside from looking at how it was written and who it actually serves, the fact is, the judge should never have released it in the first place since pretending to be a victim and sending in a false statement to a court is a crime in itself. The letter is key evidence in a felony and announcing to it’s creator that the court is now looking for him gives him a certain advantage to escape detection that any judge in his right mind would never do.

Releasing that document and the judge’s subsequent finding is highly unusual and hinders the investigation while serving only to openly discredit that GROWING majority of people in the country who find SERIOUS problems with 1. the official story of the Aurora Massacre and 2. the increasingly disturbing manner in which the prosecution of James Holmes is being handled.

Philip Anschutz and his various business dealings have come under a certain amount of scrutiny since the unofficial investigation of the Aurora Massacre took off following the July 20th attacks. Turns out not only were most (if not all) of the military gear that Holmes supposedly used during the attack were delivered not to Holmes’ apartment (which he had just recently moved into) but in fact they were delivered to the Anschutz Medical Campus where Holmes went to school and worked. Also, Anschutz just happens to be in direct competition with Century 16 theaters in Aurora since his company owns Regal Cinemas. also, since we are on the subject, most of the incriminating information coming out of the “official” investigation seems to originate with the medical campus itself and of course, none of it can be verified since the judge issued the gag order and sealed the evidence in the case. Examples:

1. Holmes email claiming he was leaving the school
2. Holmes failing his classes
3. Holmes not getting along with other students
4. “Stick figure drawing confession” “found” in campus post office
5. Holmes trying to call this psychologist minutes before the attack

All of this information is currently unverifiable and all of it, each piece of the “evidence” being used to try Holmes in the court of public opinion, comes STRAIGHT from the institution directly owned by Anschutz.

As if that wasn’t damning enough, consider this… the latest in the Holmes case involves a letter than was supposedly sent by a victim of the shooting which purports to claim that a vast “Illuminati” conspiracy is behind the event and that the victim is not really a victim of the Century 16 shooting, but rather he/she was shot by the Aurora police chief, Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers in order to frame Holmes. The letter also goes on to suggest some if not all of the victims are fake (actors) and that Philip Anschutz and his corporation are partially behind it all.

Where did the story first make it’s way to the public?

Examiner.com   which is owned by… wait for it… wait for it… Philip Anschutz

Other business ventures

• Forest Oil
• Pacific Energy Group
• Regal Entertainment Group, the largest movie theater chain in the world, with approximately 6,000 screens. Anschutz owns more than half of the company, which is a collection of former bankrupt chains.
• Union Pacific Railroad (Anschutz is the company’s largest shareholder, with a 6% stake.)
• Clarity Media Group, a Denver-based Publishing Group which includes:^[25]
  • The San Francisco Examiner (purchased in 2004)
  • The Washington Examiner, which was spun off from a number of D.C. area suburban dailies.
  • The Baltimore Examiner, which launched in April 2006 and was shut down in early 2009. (Anschutz has trademarked the name “Examiner” in more than sixty cities.)
  • Examiner.com, a hyper-local web portal where citizen journalists write on local topics, from news to blog-like stories.

The Examiner article claims that it’s a remarkable development, this fake letter sent to the judge in the Holmes show trial and then goes on to list some of the various theories the unofficial investigators have developed over the past month or so.

“Corroborating much of a recent Conspiracy Examiner story maintaining the situation as potentially being another horrific (rogue government faction) conspiracy and possible false-flag event, the newly discovered evidence, thrown out of court by Judge William Sylvester days later, details stunning accusations against billionaire Philip Anschutz, Police Chief Dan Oates, Arapaho County Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers and, according to the alleged victim, the Illuminati as being potential co-conspirators in the crime.

The stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes. But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.” Jeffrey Phillips

I don’t know who Jeffrey Phillips is, but you can go here to read something he did about Dave Mustaine (ooooo a celebrity) in which he links to someone’s website claiming that Holmes’ father was going to testify on the LIBOR scandal… yep… that Sorsha Faal disinfo that popped up a month ago. Apparently everyone EXCEPT Jeffrey Phillips has figured out that BS a while ago, but… again… I digress.

You can go here to read the short, one paragraph Motion to Intervene in the Holmes case as well as the judge’s reply to it.

The judge in his reply makes it very clear that they have already established that the victim who supposedly sent the letter had no part in it. Which is pretty easy for a court to determine.  It’s about as simple as a phone call or a 10 minute ride in a car.

And let’s face it, whomever wrote that and sent it, would NEVER have simply done so without going WAY public at the same time or before because, OBVIOUSLY… if the police chief shot them once….

So, why fabricate a letter which would be so easy to discredit immediately? Who would do such a thing and include in it such inflammatory statements that the police and prosecutors are teaming up to frame Holmes and faking victims who are actually prostitutes and even shooting people themselves?

“Other suppose (sic) victims in this case are government actors… please donate to my charity…”

Who would write such a ridiculous letter and send it to the courts?

And why would they include the statement “James is being framed by Phillip Anschutz, police chief Dan Oates, and the illuminati (sic)”?

The key to understanding who wrote the letter is looking at how it was handled. When the judge released it, he released key evidence in a new crime in and of itself. He tipped off the culprit who is now probably in Dubai or somewhere non-extradition.

Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn’t releasing this fraudulent motion constitute a crime in itself? Does it make the judge an accessory after the fact? Does it provide aid and comfort (and a head start) to the criminal?

Should releasing this document disqualify the judge from sitting on this case?

All good questions.

But one thing it does do, it makes any suspicion of Phillip Anschutz seem like crack-pottery and to that end it’s immediately written about by none other than one of Anschutz’ own publications….

what a coincidence.