Profile image
By CoyotePrime (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

The Economy: “The Point of War Is Not to Win”

Monday, October 3, 2016 2:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

“The Point of War Is Not to Win”
by Bill Bonner
“It is a bright, sunny day here in Ireland. A good day for the Grand Opening of our new overseas headquarters- a classical-style mansion that was built for a local merchant family in the 1860s. Later today, we’ll give a brief speech thanking all those concerned…drink a few glasses of wine…and hope to God we haven’t made a huge mistake.
Anchored capital: We’ve invested- heavily- in the building, where we will have as many as 200 employees. It represents capital…accumulated over the last 35 years…that is now anchored in a forgotten corner of a foreign country. It is not ‘money in the bank’. It is not money in the stock market, either. It cannot run from high taxes. It cannot seek the highest rate of return. It is here…on this little island, subject to the tides of politics and business, unable to protect itself from either.
Long-term capital investments (this will take 20 years to pay off) need time. And time comes with risks. That’s why we have interest rates on loaned capital…and why real negative interest rates are impossible. Or fraudulent.
Time brings crises, problems, challenges, setbacks…and the grim process of aging, breakdown, and decay. In time, everything goes away. We are confident, for example, that it won’t be too long before the market cracks. (Please don’t hold us to this forecast, but don’t forget if it turns out to be correct!) US corporate profits are falling. GDP is sinking. Productivity has slumped for the longest period since the 1970s. And going by the CAPE ratio, which looks at stock prices relative to the past 10 years of earnings, only three times in the last 100 years (in 1929, 2000, and 2007) have stocks been this expensive.
Newfangled ‘stimulus’: The crack, when it comes, will produce new demands of fiscal stimulus and money from helicopters. Just to keep our terms straight, fiscal stimulus comes from government borrowing and spending. It shows up in the deficit. ‘Helicopter money’ is spending directly financed by central bank money creation. It happens without a single dollar being added to the deficit. They are very similar; what matters is how they are financed.
When it comes, the next recession will provoke calls for spending on infrastructure projects. These will be accompanied by estimates of how much the projects will return. The numbers are pure nonsense. Without a real cost of capital- and a way to price the output or figure out the profit from a project- all the calculations are fiction. But we are getting ahead of ourselves…
Fake wars: So far, so good. Hillary is the frontrunner. If she wins, nothing will change. If Donald wins, nothing much will change, either. But he may rattle investors. Who knows?
One of the hardest things to understand about our present situation is the way in which things are not what they seem. We have written frequently about how today’s money is fake. How interest rates are fake. How statistics are fake. (Take the ‘unemployment rate’… Please!) Our ‘wars’ are now fake, too. When the feds announce a new war, we naturally assume their goal is to beat the enemy. Not so. Instead, they want to keep the war going. That means NOT beating the enemy. That way BOTH sides win.
The War on Poverty was the first of our fake ‘wars’. It was a nice collusion between poor people and an entire industry- 92 government programs- that received and spent money on their behalf. Set up in 1964, the War on Poverty has already cost $22 trillion…and it goes on.
Why? Because poor people get money. And because the ‘elite’ which controls the cash flow gets the support of poor voters…and a substantial part of the money, too. For every dollar distributed, the poverty-fighting insiders keep 72 cents (a figure widely discussed, but far from certain). If that figure is correct, the insiders have pulled in more than $15 trillion over the last 50 years- by pretending to fight poverty!
Drug kingpins: The War on Drugs came in 1971. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron says it has cost taxpayers a trivial $41 billion. The ‘war’ is best understood as a public-private partnership- between the illegal drug business and the drug-fighting agencies. After all, where would former addict and now America’s ‘Drug Czar’ Michael Botticelli be without the drug pushers? And without the DEA, where would the drug kingpins be?
Suppose they had to compete on price, quality, and service…instead of on drive-by shootings. They’d soon be put out of business by guys with PowerPoint slides and spreadsheets. Giant tobacco and liquor companies- with decades of experience, distribution networks, retail channels, and marketing know-how – would eat their lunches immediately. Instead, the illegal drug industry- the drug fighters at the ATF, DEA, FBI, local police, the prisons, the courts, and a whole subculture of criminals- stays in business. More on our fake wars…including the biggest of them all…tomorrow.”

“Blood Money: These Companies and People Make Billions of Dollars From War”


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.