by Scott Creighton
Still think it’s all just a big conspiracy theory? You better wake up.
al-Qaeda was our baby, a regime change project that sought to undue the 1978 Saur Revolution in Afghanistan that overthrew the pro-Western dictator, Mohammad Daoud Khan. The leaders of the revolution set out pissing off the masters of the universe immediately by instituting “several unpopular reforms during their rule, the most notable being equal rights to women, universal education and land reform”. The Wahhabists that we typically use for these matters are a particularly perverse far-far-right brand of Islam custom made in Saudi Arabia to fit with their pro-Western, Mammon-worshiping style of the religion. They hate any socialist version of their religion and since that is pretty much all of them, they hate most Muslims which makes them perfect for this kind of work. But for the record, no, the Soviet Union did not “invade” that Afghanistan in 1979 any more than they “invaded” Crimea.
“We also have a history of kind of moving in and out of Pakistan. Let’s remember here, the people we are fighting today we funded 20 years ago and we did it because we were locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union, they invaded Afghanistan and we did not want to see them control central Asia and we went to work. And it was President Reagan in partnership with the Congress led by democrats who said you know what? Sounds like a pretty good idea. Let’s deal with the ISI and the Pakistani military. Let’s go recruit these Mujaheddin. That’s great let’s get some to come from Saudi Arabia and other places importing their Wahhabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union. And guess what? They retreated. It cost billions of dollars and it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. And there’s a very strong argument that it wasn’t a bad investment to end the Soviet Union. But let’s be careful what we sow because we will harvest.” Hillary Clinton
There is a long history of covert US operations resorting to terrorism in order to achieve their social, political or economic goals in various nations when other, less controversial methods fail. In 1953 CIA operative Kermit Roosevelt ran Operation Ajax to get rid of a popular and elected leader who was too left leaning for the tastes of our national interests. In 1954 the CIA set Operation PBSUCCESS into action in an effort to remove then president Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán because he set up a New Deal type program in Guatamala. In 1959 Operation Mongoose and the Cuban Project got underway which was subsequently continued during the short lived rule of your “progressive” hero John F. Kennedy and we all know why they did that. In 1981 Reagan’s first “Freedom Fighters”, the Contras, were hatched using drug money and cash from the illegal sale of weapons to the Iranians.
al-Qaeda, as a proven commodity and a “winning” covert terrorism destabilization force, showed up to do their thing in Azerbaijan in 1993, Bosnia in 1992-95 and Kosovo in 1997-98. All under the “progressive” Bill Clinton presidency.
So this is not a difficult thing to understand in terms of al-Qaeda being just one more proxy army of thugs to have been used by the darker side of covert, unregulated US military planners who are in charge of such things. It’s been going on for quite sometime and has the fingerprints of several “progressive” seeming presidents all over them. Keep in mind, in 1978… Jimmy Carter was president.
In 2011, don’t forget, al-Qaeda ended up helping with our regime change operation in Libya as well. Funny how they always show up in a country we wish to regime change, fighting against the same target we wish to remove. That was under President Peace Prize’s watch.
And now we have al-Qaeda in Syria, al-Nusra, fighting against our target, just like so many times in the past. Anyone seeing a pattern yet?
“This is not a secret anymore. The mask has fallen down.”
29 Sept 2016
Syria's Jaafari: Al-Nusra [al-Qaeda] are receiving heavy weapons, even tanks and anti-air missiles from western countries pic.twitter.com/OHxbdiboyK
— the Lemniscat (@theLemniscat) October 3, 2016
“The Americans are on our side. Arming us” leader of al-Qaeda in Syria a.k.a. al-Nusra.
“Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support. The fight is difficult. The regime is strong and gets support from Russia,”
Al Ezz said that Jabhat Al-Nusra “won battles thanks to TOW rockets. Due to these rockets, we reached a balance with the regime. Our tanks came from Libya via Turkey, joined by the [BM-21] multiple rocket launchers,” he said.
The government forces have an advantage because of aircraft and missile launchers, but “we have the American-made TOW missiles, and the situation in some areas is under control,” Al Ezz added.
When asked if the TOW missiles were initially intended for Jabhat Al-Nusra or if the group obtained them from the moderate Free Syrian Army, the jihadist clarified: “No, the missiles were given to us directly.”
He also said that when Jabhat Al-Nusra was “besieged, we had officers from Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel and America here… Experts in the use of satellites, rockets, reconnaissance and thermal security cameras.”
The journalist asked specifically if the US instructors were really present among the jihadists’ ranks and Al Ezz replied: “The Americans are on our side.” RT
Historically speaking, Al Ezz has a good point. Of course they are on their side. They created them in the mold of all the previous proxy terrorist armies of the past.
The US military planners have inserted Special Forces troops on the ground with our various “moderate” terrorist groups in Syria. Been doing that for a while. And now, it is a proven fact that these “moderate” groups are blending in with al-Qaeda a.k.a. al-Nusra and “ISIS” in order to get the Syrians and the Russians to stop bombing those groups.
“In Aleppo, rebels in the Free Syrian Army are sharing operational planning with Jaish al-Fatah, an alliance of Islamist groups that includes the former Syrian wing of al Qaeda.Meanwhile, in nearby Hama province, FSA groups armed with U.S.-made anti-tank missiles are taking part in a major offensive with the al Qaeda-inspired Jund al-Aqsa group.
The FSA rebels have deep ideological differences with the jihadists, and have even fought them at times, but say survival is the main consideration.” Reuters
Survival is the main consideration. Survival of the moderate terrorists or survival of the regime change operation? You be the judge.
In Deir Ezzor the US military went a step further than simply putting Special Forces in the line of fire and daring the Russians to shoot at them. They used airpower in support of an ongoing al-Nusra/ISIS operation to take the city. They bombed Syrian forces one weekend killing 80 of them, which was an open act of war. Then this past week they deliberately destroyed 4 key bridges in the area in order to stop Syrian troops advancing on the weakened terrorist destabilization proxy army.
Back in 2012, long before “ISIS” existed, Foreign Policy magazine praised the terrorists in Syria, like al-Nusra for example, for going after Assad and trying to help us force regime change in the country.
“Islamists — many of them hardened by years of fighting U.S. forces in Iraq — are simply more effective fighters than their secular counterparts. Assad has had extraordinary difficulty countering tactics perfected by his former jihadist allies, particularly suicide bombings and roadside bombs.”…
So long as Syrian jihadis are committed to fighting Iran and its Arab proxies, we should quietly root for them — while keeping our distance from a conflict that is going to get very ugly before the smoke clears. There will be plenty of time to tame the beast after Iran’s regional hegemonic ambitions have gone down in flames. ” –Gary Gambill, “Two Cheers for Syrian Islamists,” (2012)
Today on nearly every MSM outlet, we praise the White Helmets and suggest they be given a Nobel Prize. The White Helmets are understood across the rest of the world to be nothing more than a propaganda outlet of al-Qaeda, al-Nusra. Even an al-Nusra spokesman says they are “no different” than al-Qaeda.
“In the latest video, an al-Nusra spokesman endorses the Nobel Peace prize candidates, the White Helmets, as mujahideen.
Abdallah Muhammad al Muhaysini, is a popular Saudi cleric who has relocated to Syria illegally and became the Army of Conquests Shariah Court spokesperson.
The White Helmets are seen as humanitarians, but the relationship between them and internationally recognised terrorist groups like al-Nusra is ignored.
Abdullah Muhaysni says the White Helmets “are no different from the Mujahideen”.
In an interview with the Swiss Islamic Central Council, he said, “I was an admirer of al-Qaeda in Iraq and the Islamic State of Iraq.” al-Masdar News
Not only does the rest of the world see them as terrorists, but so does the United States State Department.
Raed Saleh is the leader of the White Helmets. He was going to attend a function here in the states held by CIA-backed USAID but the State Department said “no” because, he’s a terrorist who runs a terrorist organization.
Unfortunately for our propaganda army, this was simply a mistake. The real Syrian Civil Defense group is considered a terrorist organization by the State Department, not their proxy propaganda outlet the White Helmets, even though they really are. The SCD is in Syria trying to save lives as our moderate terrorists attack soft civilian targets and we don’t like that so we call them terrorists. But here are the White Helmets with a few of their friends.
As I said, they are terrorists and you can’t turn on the TV these days without seeing one MSM outlet or another praising their name.
Producing al-Qaeda videos
Lastly, some news has come out about what I have been writing about for years. Namely, that al-Qaeda/al-Nusra/”ISIS” are all part of what is called irregular warfare, black ops propaganda designed to win over the hearts and minds of the general population in support of the endless War of Terror, the Thousand Years War, the Endless War.
“The third and most sensitive program described by Wells was the production of fake al Qaeda propaganda films. He told the Bureau how the videos were made. He was given precise instructions: “We need to make this style of video and we’ve got to use al Qaeda’s footage,” he was told. “We need it to be 10 minutes long, and it needs to be in this file format, and we need to encode it in this manner.”
U.S. marines would take the CDs on patrol and drop them in the chaos when they raided targets. Wells said: “If they’re raiding a house and they’re going to make a mess of it looking for stuff anyway, they’d just drop an odd CD there.”
The CDs were set up to use Real Player, a popular media streaming application which connects to the internet to run. Wells explained how the team embedded a code into the CDs which linked to a Google Analytics account, giving a list of IP addresses where the CDs had been played.
The tracking account had a very restricted circulation list, according to Wells: The data went to him, a senior member of the Bell Pottinger management team, and one of the U.S. military commanders.
Wells explained their intelligence value. “If one is looked at in the middle of Baghdad… you know there’s a hit there,” he said. “If one, 48 hours or a week later shows up in another part of the world, then that’s the more interesting one, and that’s what they’re looking for more, because that gives you a trail.”
The CDs turned up in some interesting places, Wells recalled, including Iran, Syria, and even America…
The Pentagon confirmed that Bell Pottinger did work for them as a contractor in Iraq under the Information Operations Task Force (IOTF), producing some material that was openly sourced to coalition forces, and some which was not. They insisted that all material put out by IOTF was “truthful.” Daily Beast
Whatever they claim to be the original purpose of these videos to have been (the “tracking” story is nifty but hardly worth half a billion dollars to find so wannabe terrorist living in his mother’s basement) the fact is, these videos have undoubtedly ended up on our MSM outlets and being featured in places like MEMRI TV and SITE Intelligence Group.
What’s more, as conspiracy theorists like myself have pointed out for years while writing about all those obviously fake “ISIS” videos, it is childish to imagine this program ended before being rolled into an “ISIS” video production campaign… WHICH SHOULD SERVE AS THE FINAL PROOF THAT THEY WERE INDEED FAKE AND WERE PRODUCED BY FOLKS OTHER THAN “ISIS”
Had enough yet?
There’s a reason that these are black ops. Not just the videos, but the entire program of running proxy terrorists to destabilize legitimate governments who refuse to bow down to our national interests. They’ve been the darkest secrets this country has kept for a very long time and with good reason. Because were they to come to light, the American people and even the vast majority of the military, would not stand for it. We have morals. We have a common code by which we live and the fact that they feel they have to keep them secret and create such lies in the first place to justify their ambitions, tells you they understand what they are doing is wrong. They simply don’t care because to them there is no good and bad. No right and wrong. Only profit and serving the interests of that profit. That’s how they qualified for the pay-grade increase that got them into positions where they would be made aware of such things in the first place.
Lies about WMDs in Iraq are one thing. Perverting the conscientiousness of the American people to support the very people who supposedly brought us 9/11 is another. And getting them to accept and support real terrorism and real terrorists, well, that is the real hearts and minds campaign, now isn’t it?
Day before yesterday I wrote about how the MSM is trying to get US viewers to love and respect the “housewife” death squad leader in Iraq as some kind of hero. Years ago I wrote about how the point of the Lewis Powell Memo of 1971 was to literally change the way the American public viewed the world and to kill off our ability to feel empathy. To remake the population in their corporatist model. Now we find we praise, support, defend and arm al-Qaeda, the great enemy of the state since 9/11.
Talk about extremism and radicalizing the population.
Have you had enough yet?