Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Democurmudgeon (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Walker Redistricting Maps Unconstitutional…until Trump's Activist Supreme Court is in place.

Monday, November 21, 2016 15:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Better hope the Supreme Court stays 4-4 for this one…JS-Jason Stein and Patrick Marley:

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8xLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tUE9PMDZiM1JzSlUvV0ROcnhidi1IRkkvQUFBQUFBQUFjR2cvX3hZT2dWZUFpX1E3cFNVWXBGUVdod2tBbmZDWUI5RE9nQ0xjQi9zNDAwL3JlZGlzdHJpY3RpbmclMkJNYXBzJTJCbWlsd2F1a2VlLnBuZw==Two weeks after a stunning election defeat a federal court struck down legislative maps drawn by Republicans in 2011 … judges ruled 2-1 that the redistricting maps were “intended to burden the representational rights of Democratic voters throughout the (10-year) period by impeding their ability to translate their votes into legislative seats.” Depending on the outcome of a likely appeal, the case could have national implications since it includes a new method of determining whether legislative maps amount to discrimination against voters of a particular party.

“We find that the discriminatory effect is not explained by the political geography of Wisconsin nor is it justified by a legitimate state interest. Consequently, Act 43 constitutes an unconstitutional political gerrymander,” the decision reads.

The ruling found the maps drawn for state Assembly districts are unconstitutional, but the decision would alter state Senate maps as well … The ruling does not affect congressional maps, which were also redrawn in 2011. The decision also did not include immediate remedies

“We find that the discriminatory effect is not explained by the political geography of Wisconsin nor is it justified by a legitimate state interest. Consequently, Act 43 constitutes an unconstitutional political gerrymander,” the decision reads.

The ruling found the maps drawn for state Assembly districts are unconstitutional, but the decision would alter state Senate maps as well … The ruling does not affect congressional maps, which were also redrawn in 2011. The decision also did not include immediate remedies

Finding the maps unconstitutional were Kenneth Ripple, a senior judge with the Chicago-based 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (Reagan), and U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb of Wisconsin's Western District (Carter). U.S. District Judge William Griesbach of the state's Eastern District dissented (W. Bush). Appeals go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, without making a stop at an appeals court.

The lawsuit represents the last, best chance of Democrats to regain hope of capturing a majority in the statehouse in the coming years. The maps drawn by Republicans have made it difficult to do so, particularly in the state Senate.

Note;

The 2012 and 2014 elections showed that the maps for the Wisconsin Assembly are some of the most heavily skewed maps in the country going back more than 40 years, the plaintiffs showed. State attorneys acknowledged that point in court filings.

A former liberal radio talk host who likes to ask the “follow-up question” at Democurmudgeon.blogspot.com

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.