But of course, slippery slopes are, well, slippery, and now we have an insurance carrier who took the new law to its logical (if macabre) conclusion:
“[O]ne young mother says her insurance company denied her coverage for chemotherapy treatment after originally agreeing to provide the fiscal support for it, but indicated it would be willing to pay for assisted suicide instead.”
This really shouldn’t come as any great surprise: after all, it’s simply the logical outcome of the ObamaTax’s IPAP provision. How’s that, you ask?
Well, as we’ve noted before, that feature is really just our version of the MVNHS©’s Liverpool Pathway. Admittedly, that’s actually the heavy hand of government implementing the law as written, but is it demonstrably different in this case? After all, the insurer is simply following the guidelines set forth by the state as to whom is worthy of life-extending treatment.
O Brave New World, indeed.
[Hat Tip: Ace of Spades]