Top Cop Reveals How You can Be Arrested For Certain Comments on Facebook! Watch What You Say Cause You Could Be Dragged Off to Jail! Find Out How! (Infowars Reports)

Just to be clear, if there is no victim with an injury, there is in crime; period. When a police officer arrest you for something stupid as this, that is a violation of the first, fourth and fifth amendment. Sue that officer and the city under a constitutional tort claim; 42 U.S. Code 1983 deprivation of rights, as a breach of contract and get awarded for damages.

LOL !! I will try them all and let you guys know something Let’s higher the stakes because you yanks are soo childish and stupid. I will kill Obama! Let’s see what will happened. Morons. Get a live!

Anyone using Facebook, is dumb enough for jail. Would you like to be some bad man’s girl friend?

Facebook is for idiots.
“Never argue with an idiot, they’ll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” Mark Twain

“When you argue with an idiot, there are two idiots in the argument” Me

http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/facebook-hit-with-class-action-lawsuit-over-facial-recognition-data/

Hullo Angle#1,

Charlie here. You can say anything you want so long as it is not libelous in nature but you should know that whatever is on the internet is forever. We have Constitutional free speech in America, not like turd-world countries.

And doesn’t the cop realize he is insulting the woman and her post and can be arrested by his own law?

And besides who the heck wants to be on Facebook where you can NEVER LEAVE. It is said even after you close your account the basturds track you anyway without your permission!

And Facebook is aligned too close to the sodomite’s administration like Google for comfort.

Signed,

Charlie (putting his doughnut face on)

Why does everyone blindly accept that the governments laws, codes, statutes, edicts, rules and regulations apply to the private person without EVER questioning it?? Obviously there are going to be some idiots whose opinions are in lock step with government employees, their indoctrination to blind obedience is unshakable.. BUT CAN ANYONE ACTUALLY PROVE THEIR LAWS APPLY TO THE PRIVATE PERSON?? Can you??

IF you ask government employees if their CONstitution and laws automatically apply to everyone just because of their physical location within what we commonly refer to as a state, their collective opinion is that YES, their CONstitution and laws apply to everyone, automatically. BUT if you ask them what facts they rely on that PROVE their BELIEF that it is applicable to you, they have no plausible answer, they’ll hang up on you, feign as though they don’t understand the question, tell you that they aren’t going to debate with you “EVEN THOUGH ALL YOU DID WAS ASK FOR FACTUAL PROOF OF THEIR ASSERTION OF JURISDICTION” They’ll tell you that it’s common knowledge that it applies, they’ll even tell you to prove it doesn’t apply to you, this is an attempt to avoid answering your question!!, but they’ll continue to refuse to answer as to what facts they rely on to prove any of it applies to you, BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE ANY FACTS THAT SUPPORT THEIR BELIEF BECAUSE IT NEVER EXISTED!.. remember, they already told you it applies, it is their responsibility to prove it applies because they are the ones attempting to bring a charge against you, so the onus to prove it applies is theirs,.. It is not up to you to disprove anything applies!!!

Everyone has been told that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. it’s everyones opinion that it applies, everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER; hearsay, opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions, presumptions and or so called common knowledge aren’t proof of a damn thing.

What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can anyone offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to geographically as a state.

Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal “per their own laws”. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution, nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution, nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey the CONstitution and laws.

Do you grasp the gravity of NOT being a party to some agreement, contract, compact or constitution??
When one is NOT a party to some agreement, contract, compact or CONstitution, then one is NOT BOUND TO OBEY IT OR ANY PROMULGATIONS ARISING FROM SAID INSTRUMENT! “those promulgations would be codes, policies, statutes and laws etc”

Who precisely is a party to their CONstitution?? The States are parties to the CONstitution. NOT YOU, THE LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN/WOMAN!!

Should you choose to accept the challenge to show your proof/evidence. You shall adhere to the following;

Your proof/evidence MUST be factual and personal first hand information, your proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, your opinions, someone else’s opinions, your beliefs, someone else’s beliefs, your feelings, someone else’s feelings, assumptions, presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s.
Further; You shall not invoke laws, statutes, codes, etc, or their CONstitutions or any amendments to their CONstitutions, as that presupposes that it is applicable, when that is what is in question in the first place!

And since you won’t be able to show any factual, firsthand, irrefutable evidence at all, I included the following!!

the maxim applies: quod non apparet non est. The fact not appearing is presumed not to exist.

FAKE BOOK BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO REAL FRENDS…