Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Section 1287 of the NDAA Eliminates Freedom of Speech

Saturday, January 7, 2017 6:40
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

soc-media-censorship

 

I never thought I would see this happen this fast. However, Section 1287 of the recently passed NDAA, contains prohibitions against free speech. You will not believe what you see in this report.

 

Please Donate to The Common Sense Show

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL AND DON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

 

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer. Don't wait until it is too late. CLICK HERE for more information

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.  Listeners to The Common Sense Show will receive 5% off their next order by mentioning “Hodgesnov5” in the coupon code box.  Don’t wait until it is too late. Click Here  for more information.


 


 

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. Take 5% off the cost of your order with coupon code DAVE5

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com.FOR COMMON SENSE SHOW LISTENERS YOU CAN TAKE 5% OFF ALL NEW ORDERS. SIMPLY USE THE COUPON CODE “5HODGES”

 For more information and to place your order, please click here

 

If the bad guy has night vision and you don't he wins. Don't be a victim, find out more by CLICKING HERE

If the bad guy has night vision and you don’t he wins. Don’t be a victim, find out more by CLICKING HERE

Seen.life, the sane alternative to Facebook and Google Gestapo censorship.

Seen.life, the sane alternative to Facebook and Google Gestapo censorship.

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 6 comments
  • desertspeaks

    you’re an ass..

    Marbury v Madison; anything repugnant to the CONstitution is null and void from it’s inception!

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    16 AM Jur 2d (Volume 16 American Jurisprudence, second series) section 177 on Constitutional Law, which states:
    “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it, an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
    “Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . . ‘No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.’ ”

    • Morgana Le Fay

      That may be the ruling, but how often has that worked in practice lately? They only pay attention to the constitution or court rulings when it serves their interests.

  • raburgeson

    Your do want to be hung publicly don’t you Government? And by the way yes please do repeal Obama care and the price gouging will stop. Government theft will go down. And by the way, start prosecuting in court these assisted geriatric (suicides) in in health care providers facilities, that includes the opium drip. Go after big pharma and make them remove all medicines that do not work or, make people take other medicines or, cause side affects worst than the medical problem. Remove all special protections from Monsanto and companies like it. Take all carcinogenic materials out of the food chain. Prosecute all major polluters of the air, water, and land. One last thing, you bastards will talk jobs all day long, now let’s here you start talking good living wages. Before I go on a rant I quit here.

  • Citizen of Arizona

    David Hodges needs to understand how the laws work more instead of spreading this crap.
    All I see from him is “doom and gloom” postings.

    Why don’t you try to engage me in conversation David?

    Are you an AGENT?

    Are you trying t o incite people?

    You do not even understand what is going on?
    You do not even know that there are two different governmental systems here where the power of that federal government only extends to those who are “U.S. citizens” and cannot encroach upon We the People who are Citizens of one of the several States of the United States of America where these are two completely different classes of citizenships with different duties, different allegiances, different sets of Rights, and different privileges and immunities.

    Maybe you should wake up first and get a clue what’s happening first before attempting to mislead the people.

    If you are a U.S. citizen, you abandoned the constitutional republican form of government and entered into a legislative Democracy. These are two different political systems.

    Learn the truth at http://www.NativeBornCitizen.com

    • Morgana Le Fay

      Again, you’re assuming they actually adhere to the premises of your arguments—which they obviously don’t. It really doesn’t matter what the laws state at this point. What matters is that they’re prepared to enforce their whims at gun point, regardless of whether they’re constitutional or lawful.

  • wiseoldlady

    Agree with all 3 commenters above. My gripe is Dave Hodges consistently spews ASS UMPTIONS. He gives no evidence, provides no ruling within a law, quotes nothing….but pushes rumors and others assumptions. Those like Alex Jones enable fear…hardly someone to consider for fact finding value…or even mention. If Dave actually wanted to learn he would go to the Millennial Reports and spend two days reading. Also Judge Anna Von Reitz and spend three days reading. As for Hagmann….empty words, only rumors he has gotten from others. Those like Carl Gallop or Joe Arpaio knowing the truth wont tell the public which ticks me off.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.