Alert: Obama Threatens Executive Order On Gun Control
Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns.
“The president is going to act,” said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. “There are executives orders, there’s executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet. But we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required.”
Biden said that this is a moral issue and that “it’s critically important that we act.”
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-obama-might-use-executive-order-deal-guns_694984.html
Biden: We must ‘take immediate action’ on gun control…
Biden suggested that, as he develops a set of proposals for Congress, Obama can take executive action to address gun violence.
Obama to Use Executive Order on Gun Control
Vice President Joe Biden is meeting with victims of gun violence today. Speaking with reporters beforehand, Biden said President Obama may use an executive order to push through more gun control and Second Amendment restrictions. More from the Weekly Standard.
Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/white-house-threatens-executive-orders-on-guns/#ATOXZKOpxKyitMVb.99
This could start a civil war.
According to the blaze[ Before meeting with gun safety and victims’ groups, the vice president told reporters that “executive orders” may be an avenue that the administration will use to take swift action on firearms. ]
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,604,326,378 |
| Stories: | 8,133,776 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
He can sign whatever he wants, if it goes against the Constitution it is null & void and he has committed treason. Any attempt at gun grabbing is going to be a pretty violent thing for them.
Yes, yes it would…
a well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. you dont get to pick and choose parts of it for your argument. militias are regular people, organized with guns. banning any weapon would be considered infringing on that right. infringe = 2.Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: “infringe on his privacy”. for the security of a free state tells you the right to bear arms doesnt have a damn thing to do with hunting. dont be so eager to give up your own rights for some idea of safety ever though it has never worked out that way. doesnt matter when or where, it has always made things worse.
Hey badger we are not picking parts of The 2a YOU ARE! You have every right to bear arms AND WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO REGULATE THEM.
We have a constitutional right to regulate the milita that is bearing arms!
ONCE AGAIN GUN CONTROL IS NOT DISARMAMENT! It is regulating the militia well that has the right to bear arms
GUN NUTS ARE THE ONES SELECTIVELY PICKING THE SECTION THEY WANT, WE ARE NOT WE ARE COMPLYING TO THE 2a IN ITS ENTIRETY
Next you will tell me they are using the inter state commerce clause appropriately too. Ignorant fool. Just keep buying into their bs until you have no rights left. Idiot.
Actually the federal government has no legal right to order the militia to do anything except defend the USA.
Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654: Breaks militia down in three groups. The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the:
organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia,
the unorganized militia and
the regular army.
It went further states: The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
Because women now serve and foght it now covers every able-bodied person between the ages of 18 – 45. The difference between a militia and a “standing army” is that militia train through the state governments and organizations – many governors have illegally neglected this; and that they provide their own arms.
Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states:
“The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.”
“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” George Mason, Co-author of the 2nd Amendment during Virginia’s Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788 (HE WOULD KNOW)
“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense…: Alexander Hamilton
William Rawle, authored “A View of the Constitution of the United States of America”. His work was adopted as a constitutional law textbook at West Point and other institutions: “The prohibition is general. No clause in the constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretence by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.”
Tench Coxe wrote: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
“The right is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the law, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon. . . . If the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for that purpose.” Thomas Cooley
St. George Tucker, a lawyer, Revolutionary War militia officer, legal scholar, and later a U.S. District Court judge. The Supreme Court has cited Tucker in over 40 cases. He can be found in the major cases of virtually every Supreme Court era: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and THIS WITHOUT ANY QUALIFICATION AS TO THEIR CONDITION OR DEGREE, as is the case in the British government. “ (caps are mine)
“The best we can help for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers
“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …” Richard Henry Lee
“And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …”. Samuel Adams
U.S. v. Emerson 1999: “Collective rights theorists argue that addition of the subordinate clause qualifies the rest of the amendment by placing a limitation on the people’s right to bear arms. However, if the amendment truly meant what collective rights advocates propose, then the text would read “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the States to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” However, that is not what the framers of the amendment drafted. The plain language of the amendment, without attenuate inferences therefrom, shows that the function of the subordinate clause was not to qualify the right, but instead to show why it must be protected. The right exists independent of the existence of the militia. If this right were not protected, the existence of the militia, and consequently the security of the state, would be jeopardized.”
Nunn vs. State “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right
“The president is going to act,” said Biden”
Isn’t he already acting ?
I’m surprised he didn’t play one of the roles in the Sandy Hook Psy-Op.
what would you recommend to help us get help for J.A. Nelson, the veteran being railroaded in florida and denied all his veteran rights after 14 years active service because he inherited land the US built an illegal highway across and suffered a botched VA surgery after waiting ten years to get that bone sticking out of his chest removed, then found himself the target of corrupt cop/corrupt DA because he demanded the violations of law upon his person, property and rights, yet still just another no name victim being railroaded into losing all his rights because he sought the peaceful benefit of court redress. check http://www.fairjustice.us or fairjusticeone.blogspot.com kindly send a note and any suggestions are appreciated, the censorship to isolate him from media and public help has been intense and it is so odd that in todays world when some minor fart makes news that something like this goes with one in front of you all and not even a whisper is heard.
Don’t rule out Congress. “The People’s branch” of our government is furious with the President already. All they have to do to make his dictatorial pronouncement null and void is stop funding BATF — which they are likely to do.
Also it wouldn’t get pass the courts.
B.F.D. !……………..never gonna happen jungle bunny !
Isn’t there a law against breaking and entering….oh and another one on rape? Do they think making a law will stop the criminals???
Sunshine, my friend, It has absolutely nothing to do with stopping gun crime. That is just the smoke screen that many fools believe is the answer.
The goal here is to COMPLETELY DISARM THE AMERICAN PUBLIC! and nothing more.
As any fool can see or at least should be able to see is that, “When Guns are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns”. The outlaws of concern here are the ones that have hijacked our government. May God have mercy,
I just hate it when someone conceals food then sneaks food into a schools and MURDERS THE INNOCENT
Food homicide is a completely logical and possible concept….NOT!
You are an idiot.
@sunshine yes lets do that
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Nuff said.
EXACTLY! I just hate it when a crisis happens, people want to actually talk about what caused it and try to prevent it so it doesn’t happen again!
There they go again. Someone just died and people wants to talk about it!
(This quote is in real time, someone dies from guns every hour))
Your bleeding heart and your ignorance with be the death of our freedom.
If they come for your guns make sure you give them your ammo too…first…think about it..hello all you paid shills,how’s business?
http://www.jango.com/music/Buffalo+Soldier
Why do you act as if it is a legal action in our country? Obama was put into the “Office of the President”, not put in as “Dictator”.
Why are you not spreading THAT news, THAT concept?
Spread the word that all it does is make those who enforce it criminals, can even be treason under our laws – which still carries a death sentence.
You keep giving credence to his domestic enemy attacks on the USA instead of ridiculing his actions as illegal, null and void.
Here are the oath breaking and treason laws:
Let’s start with Treaties, like those we have with the UN because Obama and his administration have said that UN Treaties give legality to his war efforts. He is lying.
Article 43 Paragraph 3 of the Charter of the United Nations provides that all resolutions or agreements of the United Nations Security Counsel “shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.”
All treaties are subservient to the exclusive congressional power to commence war. I have much more on that, but moving on to treason.
Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT those who serve within the federal government.
Title 18 US code section 2381 – Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
· Those assisting in the cover-up and implementation of Agenda 21, supporting the UN laws applying here, etc
18 USC § 2382 – Misprision of treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
· That would be the Senate, congress, and Boehner, Holder, Pelosi, H. Clinton, and the rest of that adminstration. Don’t forget that both Bush’s, and Clinton and thier adminstrations also committed these crimes and need arrest and prosecution.
18 USC § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
· That would be “change” and using propaganda, lies, misinformation, and a *corporate media cartel.
o Almost 100% of the mainstream media is owned by seven companies: Disney, NewsCorp, TimeWarner, CBS, Viacom, NBCUniversal, and Sony. They control everything: movies, television, all the major newspapers and news, and even music record labels.
When one company dominates an industry, it is a monopoly. When a handful of companies cooperatively dominate an industry, it is a “Cartel.” This is what we have with our mainstream media – an elite group that is cooperatively and covertly controlling everything that comes through our television, radio, newspaper, and theater.
o “It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.” Supreme Court, Red Lion v. FCC, 1969}
· Manipulating public opinion to destroy the US Constitution, our legitimate gov is treason.
18 USC § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
{Fast and Furious – Press Releases about it in EARLY 2009, David Ogden the talking head for Obama; Benghazi, Giving the UN ‘authority’ over the USA – using UN laws, UN here to ‘monitor’ OUR USA elections, UN taxing us, UN Military on USA soil}
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof… assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof…
{Giving the UN ‘authority’ over the USA, over the US Military – Obama, Panetta, Dempsey. UN & NATO with the assistance of this administration, the Bush administration, the Clinton administration, the Bush 1 administration…}
{The UN does NOT have any authority over the USA, nor does anyone serving in any branch of our legitimate government have the power to give them any authority over the USA – Not to decide OUR gun laws, tax us, watch our elections, use our natural resources, put Agenda 21 here in the USA, use our military and any of “our” Generals, etc or representatives who allow it are committing treason – that would be Panetta, Dempsey, and Obama, Holder, (plus H. Clinton, J.Napolitano, David Ogden, N. Pelosi, etc) who said they do NOT represent the USA, they represent the UN. Obama said in a letter to Boehner, Panetta and Dempsey in front of the senate – on video. Foreign laws and Shariah laws used in US courts}
This is not including Fast and Furious – which if you are awake at all you should remember Obama’s press releases about in in EARLY April of 2009 – it was almost his first action as president.
Or including Benghazi. Both F&F and Benghazi: Murder, Mass Murder, War Crimes, and various other criminal and civil offenses under OUR laws.
Oaths are a binding legal requirement for all those who are in all three branches, law enforcement, military, heads of state, federal workers, etc.
Breaking their Oath means they no longer meet the legal REQUIREMENTS of the office or position they are occupying, plus is a criminal offense. Here are the laws applying:
Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT the federal government.
The first law statute of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the First Congress on 1 June 1789, was Statute 1, Chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution.
The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The Framers placed the Oath of Office Clause between the beginning clauses that set forth the organization of the executive department and ending clauses that specify the contours of the President’s executive power. The President takes the oath after he assumes the office but before he executes it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting – the clause limits how the President’s “executive power” is to be exercised.
The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4.
They are BOUND by their Oath to support the Constitution, and should they abrogate their Oath by their acts or inaction, are subject to charges of impeachment and censure.
Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.
Solemn: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited”, “The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration – both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”
.
Bound – “Being under legal or moral obligation; to constitute the boundary or limit of; to set a limit to; confine”
Legally Binding: Common legal phrase. Lawful action, such as an agreement consciously agreed to by two or more entities, establishing lawful accountability. An illegal action, such as forcing, tricking, or coercing a person into an agreement, is not legally binding. Both parties knowingly understand what they are agreeing to is the other requirement to legally establish an agreement or contract.
Consideration: According to “Black’s Law Dictionary,” consideration in a contract is a bargained for exchange of acts or forbearance of an act.
Require, Requirement, Required: “to claim or ask for by right and authority; Mandated under a law or by an authoritative entity. That which is required; a thing demanded or obligatory; something demanded or imposed as an obligation.”
“Blacks Law Dictionary” states that a contract is
1. An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law.
The Framers placed “Oaths of Office” in the Constitution. These Oaths are to function as “checks” on the powers of the federal government and protect us from usurpations.
Each Branch of the federal government has “the check of the Oath” on the other two branches. The States, whose officials also take the Oath of Office, have the same check on all three branches of the federal government. And “We the People”, the “original fountain of all legitimate authority” (Federalist No. 22), have the Right to overrule violations of the Constitution by elected and appointed officials.
Article VI, clause 2, says the Constitution, and the Laws & Treaties authorized by the Constitution, are the “supreme Law of the Land”.
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary says for “Constitution”: “…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.”
If any Branch fails to obey the “supreme Law”, then, in order to preserve the Rule of Law, the other Branches, or failing that, the States or THE PEOPLE, must overrule them”.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.
5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.
5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,
5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.
One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”
Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States.
Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
President Truman relieved MacArthur because MacArthur did not support the requirements of the Constitution and did not faithfully discharge his duties. Precedent.
Washington court-martialed Thomas Dewees, finding him guilty of two offenses: (1) not taking the oath of office…another precedent. There are many more precedents from all the ‘wars’ we have been in, with the most from Vietnam (I believe).
Hope this helps you to understand. Please also realize that this also covers the state oaths.
Good luck with WW III. I think they are picking a fight they cannot ever win. It’s going to get SUPER ugly if they go for the guns.
Good luck with WW 3. I think they are picking a fight they cannot ever win. It’s going to get SUPER ugly if they go for the guns. our (so called) POTUS is nothing more than a wanna-be Chavez dictator, shame on us if we let him do this. He needs to be removed from office. He is a traitor to our constitution and this is not going to happen while true American Patriots are still alive.
Check this Veterans plight for justice -needs advocates-needs you- look for story here “This One” Veteran sues Pres. Obama for sedition terrorism upon Veterans in America- get a copy of the suit cover page free here http://www.farijustice.us or http://www.fairjusticeone.blogspot.com you can download the entire suit- he needs our help, he has been censored and denied fair lawyer representation for years, this must stop- help us help him- he documented even went to court in three states yet has been censored, declared a public threat- you name it yet he does not break the law- now they falsely charged him with a felony for stopping a pit bull from attacking him a third time in florida- the supposed stand your ground, self defense state- if they succeed he will loose all his va income for life even after he gave us fourteen years active duty and was severely disabled- please help us help him, even just by spreading the word, you can send a note of encouragement at http://www.fairjustice.us dont let this abuse become common or it might be you or someone you care about next time, demand justice now. THank you for reading this and may God Bless us all each in our own way.
no body died, it was a false event designed to jerk our heart strings and be more wiling to hand over the guns. Which they planned on taking from us long ago, disarm, disable and disillusion folks. NWO is in action follks! God be with us all America is about to change in ways no one saw coming or can understand.
It seems what precious wants, precious gets and if it seems like he might have to wait, then he pulls the dictator card and forces an executive order. He has all his cronies set up, all the ducks in a row, and even though he does have a solid case of the emperors new clothes, you people know what is going on and no one has done anything too much to stop it. Now it is too late. Don’t go clinging to your constitution to save you, it is as good as dead.
The US Constitution is an outdated joke, it’s painful o see people try to hang onto it like some sacred scripture. Use some common sense instead, people.
People like you are the reason we are going to lose all our freedoms. If I had my way you would be hung for treason amd I would pull the lever myself and watch your ingorant neck snap with a smile on my face. Im so tired of being nice to you ignorant morons that are destroying our childrens future. Please go kill yourself for the betterment of our nation.
The Fool is adding to his lawless M.O.
Nothing he says can be trusted. Nothing he says can be taken at face value. Everyone he appoints deserves a second look…..
Is it any wonder he lost his right to practice law in the USA? I can honestly say I gave him a chance….. Obama is a failure! The worst President in my life time, the worst President in our history. As far as I’m concerned we didn’t have a 44th President…….
I’ve just about had enough of this dudes ‘threats’.
I think we need to look at the cause of crimes as horendous as the school shootings, these people would have committed it without guns too. Lets look at the cause not the effect, and thus the prevention. Mental health, psychiatric drugs, vaccines that neurologically damage children, diets, junk food, parents too busy working to pay bills to look after kids, so many factors, not guns. Banning guns will not prevent crimes. period.
shut up idiot
Do they really think violating our 2nd Amendment right by taking guns away from law-abiding citizens is going to stop the mass murders? Of course NOT! What about those who have unregistered guns? What about all the weaponry the Obama Admin handed over to Cuba? Did they require them to register those guns? Did they make them do a background check? Did they check to see if they have any mental illnesses? Of course NOT!
History is repeating itself! Hitler succeeded in brainwashing the Germans through making them believe that only the military, police & politicians should own firearms; not the German citizens, & that they can totally rely on the gov’t to protect them, but look what happened ~ the Holocaust ~ BILLIONS of people LOST their LIVES!! Are you going to sit back & watch it happen all over again? Those of you who are FOR the gov’t taking away all firearms from law-abiding citizens, WAKE UP!! SNAP out of that trance you’ve been put into, you who are numbered with the couch potato zombies, living off of other people’s paychecks w/food stamps, medicaid, etc., mooching off the system so you don’t have to do a daggone thing except wait for your cards to fill back up the following month!
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
When exactly did the people become employees of the White house?
Is not legal for the white house to legislate law. Thats congress and the house job.
The Congress and House cannot change the constitution, it must go to a process in which the states decided to do so. Congress do not have the authority to change the constitution as they derive their power from the constitution. Is the states that can change it.
Even so, the bill of rights does not grant right. It recognizes right. An amendment would only means that the states stopped recognizing the right.