Hillary Clinton is a Bore

I doubt the “H” logo festooned with an arrow or the roadtrip in a Scooby Doo van awakened the support she seeks. Her campaign roll-out surely didn’t inspire the middle class masses, and it clearly did not strike a chord among bigger donors, like those in Hollywood, that we’re used to seeing. As reported In Politico:

“Here’s the deal,” said one such donor. “I have to tell you, there is such a lack of enthusiasm for Hillary it’s really kind of stunning. We’re raising our $2,700, but that’s all we’re doing. Nobody’s called us. I mean, in the ’90s, we gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Clinton and the party and the congressional committees. Hundreds of thousands. We might have been minor players compared to George Soros, but nobody’s called us.”

The Clintons of the 2010s are not the Clintons of the 1990s. In between then and now they’ve had scandals and stagnant tenures in public office, but that’s not the main issue. The central political figure of this power couple is now Hillary, not charming Bill. More importantly, going from a president who is a young, black, community organizer to the older, established, wealthy, and white doesn’t really sound like the word “progressive” to me. And we know how the Left just loves that branding.