Clinton: Oblivious Obsession Oblivion

Hillary Clinton appears to fit the definition of a “showperson” even more than Donald Trump does! Her press-conferences able to make any competent politician blush with shame are actually wild mixture of poor acting, unscrupulous playing to the gallery and addressing the most primitive human instincts.

There’s not a grain of truth in what Clinton has been saying, starting with the autobiography tales (her grandparents allegedly were all migrants but the true fact is that three of the four of them were actually born in the United States: or that she owes her name to the conquest of Everest by Sir Edmund Hillary, while in reality he had never climbed up the mountain until she was six; and that she’s of truly Jewish descent, the detail never mentioned for the non-Jewish public). It’s also the case when it comes to gambling about the health of the Democratic Party presidential candidate, or giving recipes to solve absolutely every problem in economy, domestic or foreign policy, or whatever else. 

Say, it sounds impressing when it is declared that Democrats have managed to minimize for the populace the health care costs. This is a blunt lie! Likewise, there’s no truth in the words of Clinton about her uncompromising battle to defend the rights of women: it’s now a widely known fact that when she used to work an attorney she successfully defended an accused rapist who, she knew it for sure, was really guilty. Her affected anxiety over the women’s problems is the same sort of farce as all the other election technologies. There are many women who could reveal the truth about how the great defender of women, Hillary Clinton, advised the victims of her husband’s sexual assaults ‘rather stay alone with their grief’ or admit their own blame for what had happened to them.

A separate subject presently is the inability to give somewhat intelligible explanation of the sponsor aid coming to the Clinton Foundation from the Saudi royal family being target of persistent criticism over its financial feeding of Islamic radicals. The money that once brought the September 11 disaster to America is now involved to secure victory of yet another Democrat president. It’s no wonder actually, for it was exactly during Clinton’s State Secretary tenure that Islamic radicals came to power in Egypt, Libya and throughout the Middle East.

There’s only one thing not available at present to demonstrate the true course of the democratic administration’s continuity: it once gave to Obama the Nobel peace prize, which, following the logic, is to be awarded to the butcher of the Libyan people now!