Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By RedState (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Claire McCaskill Says There Was A ‘Legitimate Question’ Whether Hillary Broke The Law

Tuesday, November 1, 2016 10:17
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Claire McCaskill in between bellowing about James Comey’s timing of his statement acknowledged there is a legitimate reason for the FBI to be looking into whether or not Hillary Clinton broke the law.

Democrats wouldn’t have to be in such a freak out if they didn’t nominate such a weak candidate.

But they did, and so the vitriol being directed at Jim Comey is just plain silly. If this costs Hillary the election, it speaks far more to the fact that she is a horrid candidate and not anything Comey said or did. The idea his move is political is laughable on its face. If he wanted to do the politically expedient thing, he’d recommend she criminally charged for her conduct.

Still, McCaskill says the FBI’s inquiry is entirely legitimate:

Hillary meanwhile, is taunting the FBI saying, “There is no case.”

There is the possibility Hillary escapes legal troubles, but there is no guarantee the same can be said for Huma Weiner. We’ll just have to wait it out and see what happens.

The post Claire McCaskill Says There Was A ‘Legitimate Question’ Whether Hillary Broke The Law appeared first on RedState.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.