The hacked documents from the Clinton Foundation’s server released by the hackers testify to the fact that the Democratic nominee’s presidential bid is financially supported by foreign banks, foundations, charities and other organizations. More often than not, those are structures allied to the influential political forces in their own countries. In this array of sponsors some are settling their accounts to compensate it for the services rendered to them by Bill and Hillary Clinton during their state tenures. Some other hope for future gains from the president yet to win in the ongoing race. There are also the financial donors of Clinton who appear to see her possible victory in the context of their own political survival, securing stability of the ruling regimes in some definite countries, and even preserving the present world order. The concrete dividends that the financial support of Clinton could offer in future are quite predictable for each of the most vigorous sponsors.
According to the information available now, the financial backing of the Democratic presidential nominee is secured by:
1. George Soros who has donated as much as $7 million to boost Clinton’s campaign keeping it in view to get state support of his projects in Eastern Europe.
2. The Saban family, as reported by some sources, has paid $5 to 7 million to ensure the candidate’s loyalty towards Israel in case of victory in the presidential election. Clinton is expected “to oppose anti-Israel measures” and act “as a better friend of Israel if compared to cool Obama’s attitude”. The question is, whether the reality is equal to these expectations.
3. The Boeing Company, a major global aircraft manufacturer and a weapons producer, is also realizing some military and space projects. Clinton is prone to settle conflicts by forceful means, while the company is intensely interested in being awarded with the state military contracts for further promotion of its production.
4. According to the Jordan news agency Petra, the Saudi Royal family has been one of the key donators of the Clinton’s election campaign. During the recent years it has poured about $35 million into some “charities” run by Bill Clinton. This could have affected some American political moves, and, it is undoubtedly going to influence the decisions of the future U.S. president, so that to secure survival of the barbarian medieval like Riyadh regime.
5. Google, a major actor on the information technology market, is also engaged with Clinton campaign. According to some data, the Google search service is set to deliver positive information about candidate Clinton in the first run. If she wins, the company is to get new orders for the information support of the new administration work.
6. Victor Pinchuk, a Ukrainian mogul invariably ranking among the top 10 richest persons of the country, has donated around $13 million to Clinton Foundation since 2006, The New York Times reports. In recent times Ukraine has been repeatedly showing up with its domestic problems on international arena. Pinchuk intends to employ the support of the new White House hostess to favor the Ukrainian oligarchic clans linked to him, and the Kiev regime in general. His expectations are likely to come true.
7. Chase Bank, a subsidiary of the banking corporation JP Morgan Chase, became the main world manager of the Third Reich financial assets following the 2015 year decision on nationalization of the “sleeping” Nazi bank accounts in Switzerland. This bank is a cash contributor into the judicial defense of those “illegally charged” with Holocaust involvement. It regularly launches systemic informational campaigns to discredit the activities of the international Jewish organizations. It is also supportive of The American Nazi Party, National Socialist Movement in the USA, and neo-Nazi organizations throughout the world.
It would seem that Trump, with his rhetoric targeted against immigrants, should rather attract the Hitler ideology followers. But Obama administration and Clinton personally, who in fact dropped out of their Israeli allied relationship, so vital for the American Middle East policy, appear to have been cooperating with “Nazi” for rather a long time. And they seem least inclined to stop this cooperation after Democrats win, due the money of the criminals actually. How should it match the expectations of some Jewish sponsors of Clinton? Only Madame Candidate herself might have got the clue. Either she is messing around with everybody just to get money, or her Jewish lenders, interested in financially profitable cooperation with the administration, prefer to have a blind eye on close nexus of their favorite with the successors of those who acted as butchers of the Jewish people.