SERIOUSLY? Joy Behar Says That Hillary Has Been Right About Almost EVERYTHING

The Coven on The View has taken quite the position on Hillary Clinton targeting 2020 Democrat hopeful, Tulsi Gabbard.

Before you start looking, no, Meghan McCain wasn’t there to drop a wee bit of sense on this airhead convention.

It all began with Whoopi bringing up Hillary’s comments in the Hot Topic segment of the show. She asked what the other ladies at the table thought of the statement.

Sunny Hostin began by saying that Hillary’s comments should be taken seriously. Hostin said that Hillary was correct about Russia — what precisely she was right about Hostin does not really clarify — and that she’s just been so right so many times that we should just believe her.

Joy Behar jumped in at that point — probably because it’s a day ending with “y” — and went further. She said that Hillary has been right about almost everything. Oh, yes, dearies according to Joy nary a falsehood has fallen from the lips of the Great, Wise One, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Seriously, Joy. The woman can’t even get it into her head that she lost the election because she didn’t pay enough attention to some of the areas of “flyover country” that were hit with high unemployment once manufacturing jobs had been moved overseas.

So… let me get this straight…

These mental midgets actually believe that Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat, who…

• was first elected to the Hawaiian state legislature in 2002
• is a veteran that served with the National Guard
• ran for federal office, got elected to the House of Representatives
• became the Vice-Chair of the Democratic National Committee only to resign in 2016 to support aging socialist, Bernie Sanders
• decided to take a stab at running for the Democratic nomination

…but then the Ruskies would make her drop out and run as a third-party candidate so that she could be a spoiler and ensure a Trump victory which Hillary says that the Russians had secured the first time using Jill Stein as the “useful idiot.”

Does that seem plausible to you?

Because it seems like a risky plan that requires a lot of forethought and years of waiting for fruition.

Or, would it just be easier (if you’re Russia) to run a smear campaign with false allegations of urinating prostitutes that you had leaked (pardon the pun) to the candidate’s opponent through “opposition research”?

Yeah, I thought so.