Steve Quayle: End Time Warning! The Door Is Closing (Video)
~~~~~
Most people who use social media have figured out that Facebook and Google are in cahoots with the government. For those who are well aware of the issues, it’s high time you switched over to Seen.life. It is a website that is similar to Facebook but without all the censorship.
Firearm friendly, you may buy sell or trade anything allowed by site TOS rules.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,604,573,335 |
| Stories: | 8,134,400 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
STEVE QUAYLE IS NUTTIER THAN A FRUITCAKE!
Fruit cakes don”t have nuts in them you dim wit !
Ahh, yes they do. Lots of them.
True, chef. I’ve never actually had a fruitcake that didn’t have nuts, but I’m sure you could make it without. I feel like we’re splitting hairs.
But not as nutty as Dave Hodges.
Agree, Hodges cannot grow past his 1980 thinking. Is it mental block, ignorance, narcissism, gullibility, thinks he is smarter or what…. He is certainly the most narcissistic of all the contributors….every third word is about him…..I-I-I-me-me-me. Grows very old, in fact I avoid his articles many times rather than listen to his re-wrapped hogwash about Russia. On the other hand Mike’s articles are excellent and very intelligent. If you read between the lines on the videos when Dave and Mike are interjecting I sense a polite disgust from Mike regarding Dave.
The watcher is obviously suffering from Cognitive Dissonance
…I knew there was something…
Believing a Quayle “prophecy” is like believing Slick Willie never inhaled.
…Actually…quayle is worth listening to, if only for details…the dude is deep.
These people are way off base in what they are saying. Jesus says he came “only unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel”. That is the Hebrew children from the linage of Jacob/Israel. Nobody else. But certainly not the Jews of today which today’s churches teach. Lost lost lost.
Jesus says?? um, no he didn’t
others claim jesus says – jesus never wrote a single sentence of the bible, so you can’t claim the fairy-tale character said anything to anyone at anytime
Can you imagine Andy as a judge in a courtroom instructing the jury to disregard all witness testimony because the target of the testimony HIMSELF couldn’t be proven to have written a single sentence in the paperwork presented to the court by the witnesses?
I smell an asshat.
I must know.
Just what does an asshat smell like, Chet?
(In case I ever smell one, I mean. I should probably be prepared.)
(PS — you know your little brother Wyatt got himself into a bit of trouble lately. Word on the street is he beat the bloody crap out of his neighbor and inflicted grievous bodily harm on the poor chap. Grew up to be something of a tough guy, so he did. And today, I’m pretty sure Anthony Michael Hall could kick Bill Paxton’s ass — every day of the week and twice on The Sabbath!!! Who could have seen that coming?)
(*Gary. Not Wyatt. Mea Culpa.)
Cintus quote: “what does an asshat smell like, Chet”
A little like a goat flavored cheesehead only much, much worse.
“Gary. Not Wyatt”
Gary… Wyatt… who cares. I wouldn’t give 2 squirts of pizz for either of their nobody asses right now… and no one kicks Bill Paxton’s ass… except maybe Arnie that one time in True Lies.
Anthony Michael Hall sealed his fate when he turned down the Ferris Bueller role. He’s a false christ.
Speaking of… Have you visited Raymond lately?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vqgXoq4Cg4
“…no one kicks Bill Paxton’s ass… except maybe Arnie…”
Pthhhhhhht. I saw Paxton get ett one time by a giant alien.
“Game over, man!! Game OVER!!!”
Snap, crackle, pop.
Burp.
I mean, really Chet. Even the girl in that movie did better than he did.
And he got his ass kicked by Arnie TWICE. Once in the original Terminator — once in True Lies.
“Anthony Michael Hall … He’s a false christ.”
He he he. Better tell Geir.
Also, Paxton got his ass blowed off in the last season of Big Love when he played the patriarch of the polygamist Mormon family.
Come to think of it — the only ass I recall Paxton ever kicking, was Wyatt’s ass in Weird Science. (I’ve got the brothers straight now.) But then PAXTON got HIS ass kicked by Kelly what’s-her-ass later on in the same movie!!!
He also got hisself blowed up by the Clantons and McLaureys in Tombstone.
Splat.
Paxton ever been in a movie where he WON?
re Uncle Ray Ray…
…how the hell do you always find these things?
And how the hell did he turn RAYMOND into a three-syllable-name?
I see no evidence before me whatsoever that Bill Paxton did anything but pee his jeans in True Lies after the long night of drinking and hot sex with Jaime Lee Curtis. Hearsay does not count as evidence so we”ll have to accept my memory of the facts only.
Quote: “how the hell did he turn RAYMOND into a three-syllable-name?”
Could be his new teeth. They seem to whistle a little while he works.
“how the hell do you always find these things?”
Moths….
Cint, I only recall Paxton ever “winning” in twister. He even got the girl if I remember right. It’s been a while though.
Your memory deceives you Clucker.
Paxton is the real all American gold medal winner.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDUUhdcQoBM&feature=youtu.be
“Cint…”
You better never have a typo when writing that, motherClucker!!!
“I only recall Paxton ever “winning” in twister.”
We’re talking about movies that DON’T SUCK.
“He even got the girl…”
Helen Hunt is some kind of prize? You remember her digging through a mountain of dinosaur poop in Jurassic Park? I could never look at her the same way after that. Some smells just don’t scrub off.
That poop was a metaphor for Helen (H)unt’s Career… speaking of extreme typo danger.
“Anthony Michael Hall sealed his fate when he turned down the Ferris Bueller role.”
You know, that just wouldn’t have worked.
And did you know that James Spader was the original Marty McFly? No kidding. They were SIX WEEKS into shooting the first movie when Robert Zemckis and Speilberg realized they had to switch leads.
That’s commitment to the craft, right there. And just like Bueller, BTTF wouldn’t have been nearly as good without the switch.
you mean disregard all hearsay evidence? as the law demands
hearsay does not count as evidence, anywhere, legally, scientifically, nada, nicht, nein, none
show me some evidence that is not “hearsay” pls – i’m open to facts
Andy Hat:
“you mean disregard all hearsay evidence? as the law demands”
No Andy. I don’t mean that at all. I mean make an effort.
At least a few first-hand witnesses of HIS time recorded their witness of what HE said for you to read. That IS evidence Andy. Accept it or reject it but don’t call it hearsay.
Simon Greenleaf, a principal founder of the Harvard Law School who wrote the “Treatise on the Law of Evidence” came to a very strong conclusion as to the veracity of the gospels and their testimony based on Law and logic and an examination of the facts before him.
hey Chet
i was born n raised christian, then spent 30 years researching the evidence (not reading the research of others)
- not ONE historian of the time (even those living in Jerusalem at the same time) wrote a single thing about jesus
- not ONE of the thousands who purportedly experienced or witnessed the miracles wrote a single thing about jesus
- the romans kept incredibly detailed records, yet no mention of jesus
- of the 12 apostles, only 4 apparently wrote anything about jesus – that being said, we have no actual evidence that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John actually wrote the books attributed to them
- the most prolific author of the NT (Paul) never even met the myth
- the anecdotal writings of historians (pliney the younger, tacitus, josephus et al) born 2 generations after the purported death and resurrection cannot count as evidence, as they are not first-hand accounts
now, as previously asked – please show me your evidence (please don’t quote others who have actually done their own research,, just provide the physical evidence)
“…not ONE historian of the time (even those living in Jerusalem at the same time) wrote a single thing about jesus…”
False. See Philo of Alexandria. And if you don’t know about him, then the quality of your 30 year’s research is so abominably poor, you should ask God for a refund for your time.
“…not ONE of the thousands who purportedly experienced or witnessed the miracles wrote a single thing about jesus…”
False. I guess when you forget about the number one most published Book of all time, then you could say something like that. Just don’t expect to be taken very seriously when you do.
“…the romans kept incredibly detailed records, yet no mention of jesus…”
You know what else, Andy? There’s no mention either of Pontius Pilate in the Roman record. But we can prove Pilate existed at the time and in the place the Bible says he did. Sounds to me like you got your entire ‘30 years worth’ of research from a single website.
“…of the 12 apostles, only 4 apparently wrote anything about jesus…”
You think everything anyone ever wrote two thousand years ago still exists for our modern day perusal?
“…that being said, we have no actual evidence that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John actually wrote the books attributed to them…”
There’s just as much proof Homer wrote the Iliad and Plato wrote the Republic.
“…the most prolific author of the NT (Paul) never even met the myth…”
Then either you or Paul is a liar. Guess what, Andy? Paul is not a liar.
“…the anecdotal writings of historians (pliney the younger, tacitus, josephus et al) born 2 generations after the purported death and resurrection cannot count as evidence, as they are not first-hand accounts…”
Well then. I guess historians in general had better all hang it up. I mean, nothing they have to say about anything is worth much at all, according to you. Is this really the best quality argumentation you can muster? Yes. It is. But that won’t stop you demanding evidence from others. Go re read the entire first chapter of Paul’s Letter to the Romans. You owe yourself the evidence, Andy. No one owes you anything.
Andy quote:
“I was born n raised christian, then spent 30 years researching the evidence (not reading the research of others)”
Where did you end up after 30 years of research into the evidence you could see?
Just curious. Buddhism? Alien planet seeding by Nephelim giants?
dunno how many times i have to ask – but EVIDENCE PLEASE !?#@$!
“False. See Philo of Alexandria”
you think i haven’t been around the block a few thousand times with people such as yourself? and what have you got to throw my way but Philo? he never once mentioned jesus and if you have evidence to the contrary please provide it
“False. I guess when you forget about the number one most published Book of all time”
using the bible as proof of jesus is like using Lord of the Rings as proof of gandalf – this is why researchers look for corroborating evidence OUTSIDE of the bible,, and there is none
“You know what else, Andy? There’s no mention either of Pontius Pilate in the Roman record.”
entirely irrelvant, i don’t care if Pontius was real or not as nobody claims Pontius was GOD – we’re talking about your jesus right?
“You think everything anyone ever wrote two thousand years ago still exists for our modern day perusal”
course not, however there’s not even a single mention of the other 8 writing a singe thing
“There’s just as much proof Homer wrote the Iliad and Plato wrote the Republic.”
again with irrelvant crap, nobody claims Homer is GOD, so it matters not whether he was real
“Then either you or Paul is a liar”
here we go again, making extraordinary claims without providing any evidence – can you please provide evidence of Pauls claim to have met jesus in person
“Well then. I guess historians in general had better all hang it up”
i guess historians had better find some REAL evidence, instead of the anecdotal writings of people born 2 generations after the “fact”
i have now asked you 3 times for EVIDENCE, are you aware of what evidence is? ARGUMENT is not evidence
links to your evidence please kind Sir
where did i end up? at the truth
first law of thermodynamics proves irrefutably that the universe was not created and the Big Bang was merely an “alteration of form”, ergo there can be no creator
seeing you’re incapable of providing simple evidence for your claims, i won’t bother attempting to explain the above conclusion, as it will be waaaay beyond your capacity
Quote: “seeing you’re incapable of providing simple evidence for your claims, i won’t bother attempting to explain the above conclusion, as it will be waaaay beyond your capacity”
Only one of us is making claims all over the place… but I see where you are going in your demands for not only evidence but “proof”. Those are different things Andy. Discounting all that which you can not obviously cross-examine or see directly with your own eyes is a good policy.
Andy: “Big Bang was merely an “alteration of form”
YOU might call nothing into everything, or if you will the sudden expansion, in direct opposition to Newtons first Law, from a singularity in perfect equilibrium to all vibrating matter everywhere) “merely” an alteration of form.
I await the evidence for your claims.
“…you think i haven’t been around the block a few thousand times with people such as yourself?”
Yes, Andy. That is exactly what I think. I doubt very much you’ve ever engaged with anyone who knows a sufficient amount about these things. Now let’s just see about that.
From historian (and atheist) Richard Carrier on this subject from his book “Not the Impossible Faith” page 250-251:
“Nor was the idea of a preexistent spiritual son of God a novel idea among the Jews anyway. Paul’s contemporary, Philo, interprets the messianic prophecy of Zechariah 6:11-12 in just such a way. In the Septuagint this says to place the crown of kingship upon “Jesus,” for “So says Jehovah the Ruler of All, ‘Behold the man named ‘Rises’, and he shall rise up from his place below and he shall build the House of the Lord’.” This pretty much is the Christian Gospel. Philo was a Platonic thinker, so he could not imagine this as referring to “a man who is compounded of body and soul,” but thought it meant an “incorporeal being who in no respect differs from the divine image” whom “the Father of the Universe has caused to spring up as the eldest son.” Then Philo says, “In another passage, he calls this son the firstborn,” and says “he who is thus born” imitates “the ways of his father.””
So, we have 4 similarities of a pre-Christian view of a messiah and Jesus.
1) Firstborn son of god (coincides with Romans 8:29)
2) Celestial image of god (coincides with 2 Corinthians 4:4)
3) God’s agent of creation (coincides with 1 Corinthians 8:6)
4) God’s celestial high priest (coincides with Hebrews 2:17)
“…using the bible as proof of jesus is like using Lord of the Rings as proof of gandalf…”
Is that so? So a book of fiction, written by a single author is on the same level, according to you, as 66 historically-accurate Books written over 1500 years by over forty authors? And you expect to be taken seriously again, why? You expect your bold proclamations to be accepted, why?
“…this is why researchers look for corroborating evidence OUTSIDE of the bible,, and there is none…”
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/people-in-the-bible/50-people-in-the-bible-confirmed-archaeologically/?mqsc=E3769426&utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=BHDWeekinReviewNewsletter&utm_campaign=E4B308
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W12jUKnPbHI&feature=youtu.be
“…entirely irrelvant, i don’t care if Pontius was real or not as nobody claims Pontius was GOD – we’re talking about your jesus right?”
Pay close attention. YOU admitted the Roman record into evidence when YOU claimed, and I quote:
“…romans kept incredibly detailed records…”
But by conceding that Pontius Pilate does not appear in the Roman record (which you evidently do), then you admit the flaw in your own argument. Pilate was a high-ranking Roman government official of the exact same time period in question, for whom we can find no record in the documents left behind by the Roman Empire. This alone disqualifies that record of being anywhere near thorough enough to suggest that, merely by a person’s not being reflected in that record that is then evidence sufficient to claim the person never existed. Your argument is specious.
I asked:
“You think everything anyone ever wrote two thousand years ago still exists for our modern day perusal?”
You responded:
“…course not, however there’s not even a single mention of the other 8 writing a singe thing…”
So what. Perhaps they were illiterate. Considering that many of them did write, your point is moot.
“…again with irrelvant crap, nobody claims Homer is GOD, so it matters not whether he was real…”
Here’s a point you consistently miss: There are MANY folks alive today, both self-professed believers in the Bible and even non-believing theologians, who maintain that Jesus NEVER claimed to be God. In point of fact, neither you nor anyone else can call attention to a single verse in the Bible that shows Jesus claiming to be God. Because of this, many self-professed believers today DO NOT BELIEVE that Jesus was / is God. So I ask you – how on earth are YOU supposed to know whether the people alive at that time believed or didn’t believe that Jesus was God, or that He ever claimed to be? Answer? You can’t. You assume and you presume. Therefore, both your arguments and your conclusions are thrown into disarray and chaos.
“…here we go again, making extraordinary claims without providing any evidence – can you please provide evidence of Pauls claim to have met jesus in person…”
Either you have read the Bible, or you haven’t. Either you know it, or you don’t. So if YOU are unaware that the Apostle Paul claimed repeatedly to have MET JESUS… then that is too bad for you. But I will not be doing your homework for you and fishing out specific Bible verses where Paul said exactly that. Paul claims to have met Jesus and to have been taught, very extensively, by Jesus. That is the fact of Scripture. Do with it what you will.
And this is rich:
“…seeing you’re incapable of providing simple evidence for your claims, i won’t bother attempting to explain the above conclusion, as it will be waaaay beyond your capacity…”
So you think you’re the smartest fella in the room, do ya?
How about we call your bluff. How about we challenge you to a simple debate about THIS asinine claim.
You like links? Here’s one for ya:
https://www.transcend.org/tms/2016/12/scientists-confirm-darwinism-is-broken/
The gist is, ‘scientists’ are having ever-increasing difficulty explaining ANYTHING in our known universe without resorting to Intelligent Design Theory.
Thermodynamics, eh?
Let me see you use thermodynamics to explain how information is transmitted for reproductive purposes. Information derives from intelligence ONLY. Let me see you use thermodynamics to explain BODY DESIGNS or even an eye or mirror-image hands.
No Creator, eh?
Aren’t you the one continuously whingeing about proof on this page? Well? Get busy then.
Whether the supposed big bang was from a zero point (nothingness) or singularity (rock/speck) how would you explain, Andy, life from not life all the while adhering to the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy)?
Intelligent design in 3…2…1 – Go!
not a single point refuted, no evidence of a contemporary historian writing of jesus, no evidence of a single witness recording anything, no evidence of roman records, no proof matthew, mark, luke or john wrote the books attributed to them and a claim that Paul met jesus without evidence to support the claim, then an outright refusal to provide supporting evidence
alot of bluster, switch and bait, strawman, character assassination & appeal to authority, but not a single link to a single piece of evidence substantiating your claim
YOU claim jesus lived, YOU provide the evidence please – i reject the notion that jesus lived because there is no evidence
if there was evidence you would have provided it, but you have not
how about you limit your next response to ONLY links proving your claims
1) the universe was created
1) jesus lived
4 requests now and still not a single link
the first law proves the universe wasn’t created & the Big Bang is the currently accepted yet unproven theory with which i happen to disagree, based on real science (electric universe theory)
not knowing how life came to be (abiogenesis) is called ignorance, attempting to fill that ignorance with “god did it” is laziness – classic ‘god of the gaps’
i don’t care if darwinism is dead, i am not looking to replace one fantasy with another
claiming your holy book (or the scripture from which it was compiled) is historically accurate does not make it historically accurate, it is not, by a large margin, though fairy-tales often include bits of truth, parallel, parable & underlying moral
interesting how you two pat each other on the back, but for what? providing nothing ?
kudos
Hi Andy. Cintus Supremus here. (As you should know by now…)
Not interested in continuing this thread here on this now dead page. I like an audience when I’m tangling with irrational atheists like you. Otherwise it’s a complete waste of time. You might be to illogical to know when you’ve been whipped, as you’re certainly too illogical to recognize the evidence you asked for has indeed been provided.
All of it.
Ignoring what’s been provided does not equal a refutation.
And stop pestering me about proof as if I owe you anything. You God-haters are always whining about proof and who owes you what.
Again, not interested.
See you on some other board.
Here’s the ‘o’ I neglected from my improper spelling of the word ‘too’.
Cheers.
Andy
the first law proves the universe wasn’t created & the Big Bang is the currently accepted yet unproven theory with which i happen to disagree, based on real science (electric universe theory)
=======
No. It doesnt
Electric universe theory = Pixie Science
Speaking of bait-n-switch, Andy, what brought me into this conversation was your claim…
“Jesus says?? um, no he didn’t”
… which you now attempt to morph into a demand for evidence that Jesus lived.
Speaking of a lack of evidence, Andy, in this thread…
/conspiracy-theories/2016/12/earth-is-not-flat-mind-blowing-video-is-evidence-of-what-earth-really-looks-like-from-space-2479144.html#comment_259005
… you attempted to refute my argument, which was based on a combined 270 yrs of scholarly endeavour, with an 8 yr old web site that purports to dumb down science to make it accessible to the average idiot. I notice you have no answer to my critique on that.
Speaking of straw man arguments, Andy, it was you who introduced the big bang theory, not me, and on that note how is the big bang any less ignorant than the biblical creation account? You yourself said the theory was unproven but only after refusing to answer several questions on the subject.
You raised several points (like Darwinism, Big-Bang, Absolute Zero Temperature and the Roman Record) and yet as soon as you were challenged on them you dismissed them as irrelevant.
In conclusion, Andy, all you did was throw a bunch of theories and buzz-word accusations around in much the same way as anti Islamist’s are labelled “racist” even though Islam isn’t a race. What’s next, Godwin’s Law?
And finally, Andy, you’re in no position to be making demands of others all the while leaving a half dozen, or so, questions on the table unanswered. Learn to debate with integrity and honesty for next time.
PS – you fled the debate on the 26th of Dec and were goaded to return on the 1st of Jan yet claim to have gone camping for 7 days. You do the math liar.
Well then, Andy…
…I’ll be guessing you don’t believe Socrates ever existed either. Why, he never wrote a single sentence either. Not, at least, anything that survived the millennia and wound up available to us today.
Plato must have invented him, fairy-tale-style.
Eh, Andy?
i care not if he Socrates existed – people don’t run around claiming he’s god
Then you are inconsistent in your argumentation, which means your conclusions will always be founded on inconsistency.
In other words — there’s almost no way for you to ever be correct about anything important.
Good luck with that.
…Preston…The “House of Israel” is the ten northern tribes, who were taken north, captive, a couple hundred years before the birth of Christ. They never returned to the holy land. They ended up, migrating over the Caucasus mountains, populating much of western Europe. Called the Caucasian race. Which is NOT the Aryan race.
2 hours of Steve? um, thanks but no thanks
…ah you wouldn’t understand it anyway, andy. It takes a little intellect friend.
how obtuse
…definitly…
…Andy…the comment about your intelligence was uncalled for. And I apologize.
…You’ve still got a short time to get some REAL info on the subject. You’ll have to get off of your ‘high horse’, to do that.
Hey Jeffery!
What happened to your AWDNews story about Assange and the Israeli threat???
Was it something I said about that CRAPFEST website? .. especially in light of the real world controversy created by another bogus piece of crap story from that site?
Do us all a favor and never ever post anything from AWDNews again. just some friendly advice.