Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Man Appears With Message From God so Intense, America Will Be Shaken to its Core! (Video)

Friday, January 6, 2017 8:36
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Hurry! Get into the ark of Jesus Christ, because a massive storm is headed our way, and there isn’t much time left! God is showing us many signs that we are the generation who will see the book of Revelation unfold, page-by-page. The question is, will you get in before it’s too late?

And now, God sends us a man of truth with an urgent life-and-death message for the United States of America.  Will we heed the warning and get prepared spiritually for what is coming? Will the body of Christ, at least, repent of her sins against God? This nation as a whole will not repent, however, you can!

During the Exodus of the Israelites from the bondage of Egypt, Moses stood in the face of Pharaoh on behalf of God and demanded, “Let MY people go!”  However, the Pharaoh refused, and so ten plagues were poured out on Egypt by God because they would not release the Israelites from bondage.  

The tenth plague was the death of the firstborn child. God commanded that His people put the blood of the lamb on their doorpost so that when the death angel came, he would passover their home and they would therefore be safe from any harm.

Afterward, the Pharaoh was so grieved by the death of his son that he finally granted Moses his request—he let God’s people go.  And we know the rest of the story.  


What I want to say is there is coming a great spiritual exodus and God is sending us people like Moses to stand in the face of the enemy who is holding God’s people in bondage and slavery to the kingdom of hell, commanding the enemy, “Devil! In the name of Jesus Christ, Yeshua, King of Kings and Lord of Lords! You Let MY people go!”  The plagues are coming. God is angry. God will set His people free!

Please, I urge you, put the blood of the lamb, (the blood of Jesus Christ), on your doorpost today (your heart, your home, your life) and get ready for the greatest spiritual exodus you will ever witness!


A Man Has Been Raised Up by God With An Intense Message For America


OTHER NEWS—In case you missed it…

CERN-Even More Dangerous Than Ever! Did They Find the Prison of Fallen Angels?


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 93 comments
  • Elekwense

    Delusional people thinking they’re prophets because it satisfies their ego.

    • Morgana Le Fay

      Pretty much—and the even dumber Evangelical sheep that follow them.

      • maxwell

        … Jesus told us all things. He told us to watch…He also cautioned us about the traditions of men, how they will mislead many.

        • K¡llúḿ¡ńàṫ¡✝☪ ॐ ﷲ ✡

          how they will mislead many. :lol: maxwell :wink:
          Hurry! Get into the ark of Lyn Leahz :lol:
          Businesses, governments, communities, and organizations
          people’s need leaders. A World without leadership
          Here is what Earth looked like :arrow: Mad Max (1979)
          The Book of Eli (2010) :lol:
          OTHER NEWS :arrow: In case you missed it… :lol:
          Lyn Leahz Even More Dangerous Than Ever!
          Did They Find the Prison of Lyn Leahz? :lol:
          Lyn Leahz is showing us many signs that we are the generation
          who will see the book of Lyn Leahz Revelation unfold,
          no censorship photos page-by-page.
          The question is, will you get it before
          Get Yours Now Before They’re All Sold Out :lol:

          • Waldo

            Lots of smiley faces in your post but nothing funny. Is that a nervous giggle? I knew a girl that laughed at everything she said when she was a teen. She grew out of it – but I remember how annoying and irritating it was. You should get it checked out if you’re an adult.

          • maxwell

            ..killuminatti&*^&$#@…I take it you don’t really have any thing sensible to share…ever…
            …SNIDE, isn’t funny if its not comprehensible, in some way…any way!!

        • Andy

          and religion is a tradition of men

          jesus abandoned judaism & did not start another religion, in fact he spoke only of spirituality (the spirituality of love)

          men started & maintained religions, they are by definition “traditions of men”

          • Cintus Supremus

            “[J]esus abandoned judaism & did not start another religion…”

            How do you know, Andy? You think the Bible is all a bunch of made-up hogwash, remember?

            Are you citing Scripture as your own source now, or, what is this?

          • Andy

            oh i dunno, probably from reading the bible cover to cover more times than i can remember

            i KNOW it’s all bunk (hence the lack of a capital for jesus), but you twits actually believe it – now if you’re going to believe it, then stop cherry picking huh?

            and surprise surprise,, a belieber who cannot stick to the discussion, but has to attempt character assassination

            kind Sir, what you think of me is none of my business :wink:

          • Cintus Supremus

            “…probably from reading the bible cover to cover more times than i can remember…”

            I see. We’ll put that to the test right here if you dare. Yes, Andy – that was me calling you a liar. Either that, or you really can’t remember how many times you’ve read it cover-to-cover because you’ve never actually read it cover-to-cover, and thus in all truth have no memory of doing something you’ve never done. Are you a lawyer?

            “i KNOW it’s all bunk (hence the lack of a capital for jesus)…”

            What is that supposed to mean? Lack of a capital of Jesus? Please explain yourself, if you are able.

            “…but you twits actually believe it…”

            Since you’ve reared your nasty little head here friend, I’ve only seen you getting manhandled by one ‘twit’ after another. That you are insufficiently mentally endowed to recognize the defeat you’ve been consistently handed is, well, more the pity.

            “…now if you’re going to believe it, then stop cherry picking huh?”

            I challenge you to show me a portion or segment of the Bible I don’t believe. You don’t even know how to rightly accuse. With each successive post you publish, I think less and less of your ability to argue, much less to even think logical and coherent thoughts within your own mind.

            “…a belieber who cannot stick to the discussion, but has to attempt character assassination…”

            Is that you John Wayne? Is this me? So then pick your topic and let’s see which of us cannot stick with it. You talk the talk, Andy. Do you walk the walk?

          • Andy

            oh, handled by twits huh? can you show me the links they used to disprove a single one of my points?

            - evidence of any contemporary historian mentioning jesus
            - evidence of any one of the thousands of witnesses mentioning jesus?
            - roman records of jesus?
            - any mention/writings of jesus by the other 8 apostles?
            - any evidence matthew, mark, luke or john actually wrote the books attributed to them
            - evidence that paul met jesus?

            NOPE, not a single shed of evidence was provided to counter these points

            now, you’re calling me a liar,, attempted character assassination again – how weak & a-typical

            i know the bible is nothing more than a fantasy fairy-tale believed by weak minds such as yours, not suspect mind you, but know without any doubt – the name jesus was not capitalised because it is the name of a fairy-tale character – was that particular sentence a tad beyond your capacity?

            i am significantly intellectually endowed to study EVIDENCE should you actually supply some,,, yet another weak attempt at personal attack

            challlenge me to show you a portion you don’t believe? – how would i know what you believe or not? when did i claim you don’t believe some part of the bible? what i can ask is if you wear clothing which use two different materials, or if you eat shellfish, or one of a hundred other silly things in the OT – if you do wear clothing made of two materials, or eat shellfish, then you either don’t believe it’s the word of god or you’re cherry picking

            how about the topic to which i originally responded and you ignored in your vain attempt to character assassinate?

            Maxwell posted:
            He also cautioned us about the traditions of men, how they will mislead many

            i responded with the conclusion that we shouldn’t trust religion because it is a tradition of men and not a creation of gods

            care to counter this conclusion? agree with it maybe? or will you perform the same bleatings presented in your last post?

          • Cintus Supremus

            “…can you show me the links they used to disprove a single one of my points?”

            Asked and given. Evidently, your reading comprehension skills are soft. Let’s see what else can use a little tuning up.

            “…evidence of any contemporary historian mentioning jesus…”

            First you give me evidence of a contemporary historian who lived in or around Judea at the time Messiah walked in the land – one who even had occasion to meet Jesus or hear directly of Him from the inhabitants of Judea or surrounding communities, who DID NOT write about Him.

            “…evidence of any one of the thousands of witnesses mentioning jesus?…”

            I thought you said you had read the Bible a few times. Whether or not you dismiss THAT voluminous source of record is not my concern.

            “…roman records of jesus?…”

            You give me a Roman record of Pilate, then I’ll give you a Roman record of Jesus.

            “…any mention/writings of jesus by the other 8 apostles?”

            If you didn’t believe Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, James or Jude, then why on earth would you waste anyone’s time asking for what Thaddaus, Bartholomew, Phillip, Thomas, Judas or anyone else had to say? Who are you kidding here?

            “…any evidence matthew, mark, luke or john actually wrote the books attributed to them…”

            It’s called provenance. Look it up. And while you’re at it, look up whether or not the earliest Church fathers attributed those Books to the named authors. There’s your evidence – the kind of evidence that would even hold up in a criminal court.

            “…evidence that paul met jesus?”

            Everything Paul says is true. We can verify much of it and nothing Paul ever wrote can be shown to be in error. Therefore, Paul’s testimony is impeccable. Paul said he met Jesus. Paul met Jesus.

            “NOPE, not a single shed of evidence was provided to counter these points…”

            These are not points, Andy. These are empty fallacies. You can’t even come up with your own objections to Scripture, but rather you draw your objections from weak and worthless website blogs authored by enemies of Scripture, albeit enemies of Scripture who, unlike you, are at least somewhat creative and do their own thinking.

            “…now, you’re calling me a liar,, attempted character assassination again – how weak & a-typical…”

            (Atypical is not the word you were looking for.) Yes, Andy. I believe when you claim to have read the Bible cover-to-cover times beyond counting, that you are lying. I know approximately how many times I’ve read the entire Bible, and so does every single student of the Scriptures who ever studied the Word.

            “i know the bible is nothing more than a fantasy fairy-tale believed by weak minds such as yours…”

            Who cares what you think you know? Why are you always bloviating about what you think you know? Demonstrate the superiority of your beliefs or zip your lip. Who cares about your opinions?

            “…the name jesus was not capitalised because it is the name of a fairy-tale character…”

            Okay. Since you are so utterly poor at conveying what’s on your mind in a coherent thought, you leave me to draw my own conclusions. I believe you are saying that the Name Jesus was never capitalized in the Scriptures. Now, you must mean the original Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament, because only a fool would make such a claim about translations, as if that claim had any meaning whatsoever. But here’s your problem (pay close attention now, Andy):

            The Old Testament was originally written in Paleo Hebrew. There are no upper or lower case letters in Paleo Hebrew. And the New Testament was originally written in Apostolic Polyglot Koine Greek. That means ALL THE LETTERS IN THE ENTIRE NEW TESTAMENT WERE CAPITAL LETTERS. Therefore, your point is as moot as it is rooted in abject ignorance of the facts. Do you understand, or shall I explain it to you another way?

            “…was that particular sentence a tad beyond your capacity?”

            Cute. You only think you’re leading this conversation because you’re so far behind.

            “i am significantly intellectually endowed to study EVIDENCE should you actually supply some…”

            First you demonstrate to my why I owe you anything of any kind. I have only ever responded to YOUR claims, Andy. I don’t owe you proof of anything. But I will debate you on ANY aspect of the Scriptures ANY time. All you have to do is ask.

            “…yet another weak attempt at personal attack…”

            I apologize if I hurt your feelings. Do you need me to address you more cordially? I can do that if you like, and I mean that sincerely. I thought I was meeting your tone and attitude with cordiality about equaling what you’ve shown believers at this website. But if you’re the kind of hypocrite who can dish it but can’t take it, well then I’ll moderate my tone in deference to your fragile sensibilities. Didn’t you write “…you twits actually believe it…” and isn’t that personal attack where you come from? Or maybe you should knock off your belly-aching and put your big boy pants on.

            “…how would i know what you believe or not? when did i claim you don’t believe some part of the bible?”

            When you said this:

            “…now if you’re going to believe it, then stop cherry picking huh?”

            Again, if you leave me to guess at your meaning, then don’t complain if I get it wrong. Use your words like a big boy.

            “…what i can ask is if you wear clothing which use two different materials…”

            I sure do. Do you imagine God takes care for the garments we don, or the garments He has DONNED us with? We are not to let our garments (our bodies) become mingled with another ‘flesh.’ (another seed) That is the meaning of the instruction from Leviticus. Ponder it.

            “…or if you eat shellfish…”

            I do not eat shellfish. Pork and shellfish are unclean substances which are unfit for consumption by mankind.

            “…or one of a hundred other silly things in the OT – if you do wear clothing made of two materials, or eat shellfish, then you either don’t believe it’s the word of god or you’re cherry picking…”

            No cherry picking here, Andy. But that’s what you get for assuming. You should always ask before you assume.

            “…how about the topic to which i originally responded and you ignored in your vain attempt to character assassinate?”

            If you have something to ask me, then ask it. I will answer it right here and I will not evade you. I will never evade a direct question, as the contributors at this website who have read my debates over the past eight years can attest.

            “…i responded with the conclusion that we shouldn’t trust religion because it is a tradition of men and not a creation of gods…”

            Okay. But before I can interact meaningfully with that statement I will need to know your definition of religion.

            “…care to counter this conclusion? agree with it maybe? or will you perform the same bleatings presented in your last post?”

            I will tell you this – there is only one religion in this world and it is most assuredly a counterfeit of The Way of God. The Way is explained to us in the Bible – throughout the Old and the New Testament. Everything else that claims to be from God is inauthentic and is, as you say, little else but the vain traditions of men – no matter the source of those teachings.

          • Andy

            as expected, alot of bluster but not a single link to a single shred of evidence

            stick with your fairy-tales child, reality is simply beyond you

          • Andy

            tell you what, after your next post full of meaningless bluster, how about you do a 2nd post and include in it ONLY links to the evidence you claim negates my points

            i’ve asked you 5 times now for LINKS to actual EVIDENCE for each said point

            6 points would require 6 links if you please Sir

          • Andy

            19 u“You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. vYou shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material.

            seems fairly succinct,, “nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material”

            19Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.

            not sure which you consider to be the perfect word of god, or which of the 7 different versions of the bible you ascribe to – neither can i see any interpretation other than what is plainly stated

          • Cintus Supremus

            We will do this fairly or we will not do it at all. You bring me evidence that anything you say is true, since YOU are the one making the claims and I am answering you. Is there something unfair about that in your eyes?

            “…how about you do a 2nd post and include in it ONLY links to the evidence you claim negates my points…”

            How about this:

            1. You make a claim.

            2. You provide evidence in support of your claim; citation, notation or example.

            3. I address your point and the support you have provided, on the merits upon which they stand.

            You know who likes to do things the way you’re demanding they be done at present? Children, Andy. That’s who. So please, enough of this ‘prove me wrong’ back-and-forth. It grows most wearisome.

            “…i’ve asked you 5 times now for LINKS to actual EVIDENCE for each said point…”

            As if I can provide you links detailing why someone didn’t write something? Are you hearing yourself man? You want me to prove to you the reasons why historians and apostles didn’t write something. And I’m the one being unreasonable?

            You say Paul is a liar. Guess what, Andy… the burden of proof is yours. Not mine. In NO WORLD am I expected to prove to you that your slander against the Apostle Paul is actually slander. You have to prove it isn’t slander.

            “…nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material.”

            Look at it in Hebrew. Follow closely now:

            And a garment with a mixture of materials neither wear on you…

            Garment = ובגד… ū-ḇe-ḡeḏ…

            Mixture of materials = כלאים שעטנז… kil-’a-yim ša-‘aṭ-nêz…

            Ever study these words in Hebrew? Then I suggest you do exactly that – most especially the Hebrew word שעטנז ša-‘aṭ-nêz (SHATNEZ). It is not as straight forward as you imagine. What did the Apostle Paul say about this very sort of thing?

            1 Corinthians 9:9

            For it is written in the Law of Moses, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain.” Is it for oxen that God is concerned?

            Take care how you hear when you hear the Word.

          • Andy

            ah, but it is not i who claim this jesus lived – neither is it i who claim this jesus is god incarnate – extraordinary claims requires SOME evidence, ANY evidence,,,, just ONE link will do

            evidently you do not comprehend the stance of atheism,, atheism is the rejection of YOUR (the religious adherent’s) claim, because there is insufficient (none other than hearsay) evidence to support the claim(s)

            therefore i ask you for evidence to substantiate YOUR claim that this jesus was 1) a real personage 2) jesus was/is god incarnate

            i also posited 6 countenances to your claim and asked you for evidence to BOTH negate said countenances AND substantiate YOUR claim(s)

            you have for the 5th time failed to provide requested & linked evidence, instead you have deflected, switched & baited, appealed to authority where none exists, attempted character assassination,,,,

            essentially you have done EVERYTHING possible EXCEPT provide evidence to negate my points and/or substantiate yours

            6 links pls :razz:

          • Andy

            p.s. your opinion (about my countenances) IS NOT EVIDENCE negating them

            we all have assholes remember?

          • Cintus Supremus

            “…it is not i who claim this jesus lived…”

            Yes it is. Otherwise you would not spend as much time arguing about Him.

            “…neither is it i who claim this jesus is god incarnate…”

            So? He taught so Himself and so did His disciples and apostles.

            “….extraordinary claims requires SOME evidence, ANY evidence,,,, just ONE link will do….”

            Again, you lie. Because if you refuse to take into consideration the 66 Books of Scripture Canon which teach all we need to know about Him, and if those 66 Books are available to the careful student and are more than enough to demonstrate the inerrancy and perfection of God’s Word, then there isn’t a link about anything, anywhere that anyone can provide you with that would be sufficient to satisfy your annoying complaints about lacking evidence.

            “…evidently you do not comprehend the stance of atheism…”

            I comprehend it just fine. Atheists are petulant and angry little people who deny God exists. But this they do because they are liars who feel they cannot express their true motive, which is that they are angry at or even hate God.

            “…atheism is the rejection of YOUR (the religious adherent’s) claim…”

            I haven’t made any claims, Andy. Therefore, you can’t reject my claims and therefore your definition of atheism is a false definition.

            “…because there is insufficient (none other than hearsay) evidence to support the claim(s)…”

            2000 pages of verifiable and testable written material is evidence, friend. And no matter how many times you declare it isn’t, you’ll still be wrong.

            “…substantiate YOUR claim that this jesus was 1) a real personage 2) jesus was/is god incarnate…”

            I will do that from the Scriptures, if you like. The Scriptures are all I need. I can first prove the authenticity of the Scriptures and then I can prove that Jesus both existed and is God incarnate, using those same Scriptures that you pretend to know so well.

            “…i also posited 6 countenances to your claim and asked you for evidence to BOTH negate said countenances AND substantiate YOUR claim(s)…”

            This is the last time I’ll be answering your bogus and repetitive assertion. Your bullet-list was BS and you know it, I know it and everyone bothering to read our exchange knows it. Now stop your whining about character assassination, bald-faced hypocrite that you are, and do something useful if you are able. Not? Then you and I are just about finished. Clearly you are incapable of meeting anyone in meaningful debate and, what’s more, you certainly seem to know it. And now I know you know it, Andy. You are about the most childish and simple-minded opponent of the Word I’ve encountered in my eight years at this website. That’s nothing to be proud of, considering some of the usual company here.

          • Damien


            I agree with you that there is no worthwhile historical proof of Jesus ever existing. All claims to the contrary are just intellectual bankruptcy.

    • DennisB

      I’m thinking this is all NWO/ISREAL BS. Just fear to control you with.

    • watchman48

      God is the same today as He was 2,000 or 6,000 years ago, He changes not…. Do not be so foolish as to put Him in a box and say God doesn’t deal with man as He did in biblical times, for we are in His Age of Grace and He will deal with each of us as He see fit…
      There is nothing our Heaven Father will not forgive other than unbelieveth: If a loving Heavenly Father can forgive a murderer can He not forgive us all and even tell us so…. The proof of this is right here, Google: “watchman48 The Greater Message.”

      • watchman48

        Oops, the old fingers run fast than the old brain… I wanted to say, Now if our Heavenly Father is so concerned about our lives, and He tells us that His wish is that none should perish than would not a loving Father warn His children of the destruction that is coming?
        The 9/11/01 attack was the first of three major attacks. The second major attack will be approx. 1000 times greater. The third major attack, USA will never ever rise to power again.
        Google: “watchman48 RFC Newsletter #101.”

  • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

    Seriously, another one?

    Why do you keep giving delusional lunatics a soap box?

    O wait, this is BIN, and that’s all BIN is now a days.

    • Morgana Le Fay

      That’s all it has ever been since I’ve known about the site—which although irritating at times is precisely why it’s entertaining.

      • Morgana Le Fay

        But really, they should have a large banner at the top of the home page that reads: “ABANDON ALL LOGIC YE WHO ENTER HERE.”

        • Andy

          i physically laughed out loud :lol:

          • The Clucker

            I can’t recall ever laughing out loud and it not being physical.

    • K¡llúḿ¡ńàṫ¡✝☪ ॐ ﷲ ✡

      If God were to speak to you, what would He say to you Lyn Leahz :lol:
      Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes :arrow: Seriously, another one? No :eek: first of 2017 :lol:
      Old conspiracy theories for 2016 are, in many ways, new versions of 2017 :lol:
      Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True :eek:
      Morgana Le Fay + banner = beforeitsoldnews :lol:

  • Yochannan

    YOU are required to test the Prophets

    The position of a Prophet, is someone that is specifically CHOSEN (See Is 1:3-10; Jer 1: 9) by the Almighty Sovereign Creator Power (God) named YHWH (pronounced as “YaH-WeH”) to speak “before” as in time by predicting future events, or “in place” by the interpretation of the will of YHWH before others, came about at the Mountain called Horeb (aka Mt. Sinai). The Israelites were there to receive the laws that were to govern their newly formed national identity, the Scriptural Nation of ancient Israel. The Israelites were afraid of hearing the voice of YHWH and of seeing the fire from the Almighty while He was speaking to them from the top of the mountain.

    Moses asked YHWH and He agreed to provide prophets (before-speakers) for them from their own brothers (ones like Moses) to be the speaking mouth pieces on behalf of YHWH Himself. These appointed-anointed speakers (the prophets) were designated to communicate the will of YHWH to the Israelite people. See Deut 18:15-17.

    The requirements and the tests for determining who a true prophet was from a false prophet became very important to the people. Unless the ancient Israelites of that time or even those of us living today can determine if a prophet is speaking the inspired will of the Almighty Sovereign Creator Power YHWH, the listener could be listening to a false prophet, one that was actually leading those hearing his words away from the Sovereign YHWH.

    The required Biblical tests

    According to the Hebrew Scriptures there are some very specific tests provided for us to determine if a prophet is anointed and one who was appointed to speak the words given to him by the inspiration of the Sovereign YHWH.

    The Following six verses below contain the Scriptural tests provided to us for determining if someone is a true prophet, whose word is true and was sent by YHWH.

    1. Deut. 13:1 Explained: A prophet must provide signs and wonders, BUT even if his predictions come true, and yet he leads his listeners to serve powers (gods) other than the Almighty Sovereign Creator named YHWH that prophet must not be listened to; for YHWH is “testing” those that are listening to this false prophet. The penalty for false prophets (according to Biblical Israelite law) is death.

    2. Deut. 18:18, a prophet can only come from among his own people (his own Israelite brethren). Therefore the prophet must be an Adamite by race (a Caucasian). He must also be a “true” Israelite (one that keeps the Covenant). In other words, the Israelites are not to listen to a Chinese prophet or a prophet from another race. A prophet must speak only the words that YHWH commands him to speak. He must speak no more and no less.

    3. Deut. 18:19, the Israelites to whom the message by the prophet is directed or presented, are to listen and take note (to hearken) to the message that was specifically addressed to them. They (those listening to the prophet) are to act upon the message as was told to them, or they will be held accountable to YHWH. In other words, those that refuse “to hearken” will suffer consequences for not listening and not acting or doing what was presented or required by the message from the prophet of YHWH.

    4. Deut. 18:20, Any prophet that pretends to be speaking (or prophesying) using the name YHWH, something that he was not commanded to speak, or who is speaking in the name of another power (a false God) would die.

    5. Deut. 18:21, So, to reiterate. “And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which YHWH hath not spoken?”

    6. Deut. 18:22, Explained, here we find the summary to the answer of the most important question. When a prophet speaks in the name of YHWH of things pertaining to the future and the things he speaks of do not happen, or the words are not fulfilled, then what he has spoken has NOT been inspired or given by YHWH. That prophet has spoken with presumption, and he is not to be feared or acknowledged.

    The result of this truth is the fact, that everything that a prophet speaks (in before time) or pertaining to the future of those to whom the prophet is addressing MUST come to pass within their generation. Meaning: fulfillment must be completed during the life span of those listeners. Without this confirmation the prophet cannot be tested as one that was inspired to be speaking on behalf of YHWH.

    If we living today are to assume for example, that the words of the author(s) of the book of Isaiah or those of any other ancient prophet are the authoritative and inspired word of YHWH, then all that is prophesied in the book by that prophet must have come to pass within the generation or life span of the people that were addressed by that prophet. A prophecy is NEVER applicable to people living hundreds or even thousands of years in the future.

    Prophecies of future events

    To repeat, Prophets never speak of events hundreds or thousands of years in the future. Such prophesy has no value to those to whom the message is delivered or addressed and cannot be acted upon by those listening. A prophesy of future events only has value if the predictions of a prophet can be proven to have come true in the past, this is the only way a prophet can be tested to be a true prophet. Those hearing the prophecy and those who have tested the words of the prophet in the past (according to Scripture) as coming true, can act or “hearken to” the message of that tested true prophet.

    Again, the testing of a prophet always requires a fulfillment of a past prophecy within the life span of the prophet, or within the life span of the generation listening to him. Note: a Biblical generation is within 40 +/- years from those hearing the message from the prophet.

    Those of us that are living thousands of years after the prophets of ancient Israel spoke to the ancient Israelite people as YHWH instructed them, are as a fact, reading the Scriptural events of prophesies that have already been completed. We are reading history. If for example, Isaiah was a true prophet, (there is no doubt he was) his message of a prediction would have come to pass in his generation. But to us living today the prophecy is “past tense.” In other words, all past prophecy spoken by a “true” prophet of YHWH would have come to pass since the prophecy spoken was for the benefit of the immediate future of those to whom the message was addressed and delivered.

    All other so-called prophets claiming “inspiration” must fall under the same testing requirements as the ancient prophets of Israel who spoke to the people of true Israel. If any prophet of today fails the testing requirements, then the words spoken by that prophet are not “inspired” and are NOT the words provided to them by YHWH. Their words are private, and not inspired by YHWH.

    The testing of prophets is a requirement for all true believers of the Hebrew Scriptures, and it must conform to what YHWH in the Scripture teaches us. Understanding this truth is for our own benefit and will simplify much of what we read in the Scriptures especially those “prophecies in time” that predict the future. This eliminates all past tense prophecies that were presented for the benefit of the ancient Israelites only, but are NOT directed and are not intended for those of us living today.

    Ancient Scriptural prophesies are useful to us as historical events and we can learn from them. The testing of a prophet and his prophesy helps to eliminate all unfounded conjecture and the fantastic opinions or predictions that come from false prophets. Such false prophets only seek control and manipulation of gullible people, or they are designed to lure people into jointing their Church.

    What about the Book of Revelation?

    Many modern day churches, especially TV oriented evangelical type “mega” churches are neck deep in future predictions. Hardly a week goes by when a new book isn’t offered to the Christian public (free of course with a recommended donation). This is prevalent in hard times. Millions of dollars are generated from so-called experts on the so called coming Revelation events. Are they reliable?

    Let’s take a look. The Jerusalem Bible version (just one translation) in its introduction to the book of Revelation closes in part with this interesting paragraph: “As it stands, the text of Revelation presents many difficulties: repetitions, interruptions in the sequence of visions, and passages obviously divorced from their context. Many explanations have been suggested: that Revelation was compiled from diverse sources, that whole chapters have been accidentally misplaced, etc.” (Emphasis ours)

    If one still wants to believe that Revelation is inspired, then the key to the prophecy written in the entire book can be found in Rev 1:4, since the verse says that the book of Revelation was written to the seven churches in Asia. Therefore, if you are not living in Asia some 2,000+ years ago, the events in it can not apply to you! Unfortunately Revelation is a book that some denominations can’t seem to do without. I guess they need it to keep the mystery of it going. But, were the events of Revelation “close at hand” or near “the time” the people of the seven churches in Asia lived, and when they heard the words or not? Read Rev 1:3, and 22:10, and then you can be the judge!

    Yes, you can determine the truth by using the tests that YHWH has provided for you in His Scriptures!

    • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes


      You should work on summarizing in any comments section.

      No one is going to read that much crap just to find out in the end that it’s all crap.

      • Cintus Supremus

        Formulating opinions about material you didn’t read again?

        Kind of like what you did with the Bible, right?

        • The Seer

          No one wants to read a wall of text , the world will end before you finish reading it

          • Cintus Supremus

            Before I finish reading it THIS time, you mean?

            Because you were wrong about the first twenty or so times I read it.

        • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

          Nah I read a lot, actually, just not a pile of gibberish from some mouth breather in the comments section of a website like BIN.

          And I actually did read the bible at around age 10 or so.

          After finishing it, I couldn’t believe people actually believe that stuff.

          It was full of stories just as ridiculous if not more so than Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy, I felt embarrassed that so many people I knew took that book seriously and went to church every week because of it.

          I suppose you could say it changed my view of the world, because it made it clear that there are a lot of stupid people in the world.

          • Cintus Supremus

            “…it made it clear that there are a lot of stupid people in the world.”

            Couldn’t agree with you more.

            And I hope you have a very good memory.

            I mean, who but only very stupid people would ever consider the possibility that they rightly understood something they read when they were ten years old, and are even still willing to base life-long decisions on the thinking skills of a prepubescent child?

            Out of your own mouth, Mustache.

          • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

            Actually at 10 I had a college reading level and was taking classes at the High School.

            As a 10 year old, I could see the fairy tale elements of the bible.

            Sorry that you as an adult cannot see them.

            Pretty unfortunate for you really.

          • Cintus Supremus

            One day, little boy.

            Keep reading.

          • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

            One day what?

            One day I’ll start believing words written by a people that thought thunder and lightning meant God was angry?

            One day I’ll start believing that when the bible was written magic and hocus pocus was real, and no one has seen anything like it since then because…reasons?

            Or one day you’ll realize that the likelihood of a bush talking to people is low, and that it would be impossible to build a boat that can hold 3.4 million animals, and then use those pairs to repopulate the planet despite the rampant inbreeding birth defects it would cause?

          • Chet

            I think Doogie should go back to college and work on his math and reading comprehension now that his balls have dropped.

          • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

            Nah, reading comprehension is where I was way ahead, remember? Maybe you need to go back for a refresher course on that subject, since I stated it pretty clearly.

            You know around 13,000 new species are discovered yearly right?

            “You’re gonna need a bigger boat” –Martin Brody

          • Chet

            Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes :
            ” and then use those pairs to repopulate the planet ”

            You seem to be painfully unaware that not all animals are paired in the story you claim to have read and properly comprehended and then totally discarded. Did you notice anything about the ones that were paired? Never mind. I don’t think you read the story.

            “then use those pairs to repopulate the planet despite the rampant inbreeding birth defects it would cause?”

            Lets pretend that we actually started with 7 genetically clean animals in a pollution free world. In your expert opinion is that enough to avoid genetic drift? Would i be correct to assume that any model you DO believe in requires birth defects to explain the variation of fauna the world over in the first place? Have you REALLY thought all this through as you claim?

            “Nah, reading comprehension is where I was way ahead, remember? Maybe you need to go back for a refresher course on that subject, since I stated it pretty clearly.”

            I think you are actually doing a great job of demonstrating that you hit your peak as a speed reader at 10.

          • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

            ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Have fun with your faith.

          • Chet

            “Have fun with your faith”

            Thank you. You too my mustachioed friend.

            Perhaps as the years go by you may find hidden value in things you once put away as simply preposterous.

    • Deputy Dawg

      I mean no disrespect bro, but let me summarize how misinformed you are spiritually by highlighting one absolutely ridiculous statement you made; “Again, the testing of a prophet always requires a fulfillment of a past prophecy within the life span of the prophet, or within the life span of the generation listening to him.”

      I’m sure if you were to reread scripture trying to keep what you read in context and not see through opposing doctrinal talking points you’d discover that Jesus was actually long prophesied before his actual birth. There are many scriptures alluding to this fact, but let me give you one such passage off the top of my head, it’s in the bible’s book of Isaiah.

      Isaiah 7:13-14 (KJV) And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also? 14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.”

      Is it possible you are wrong about other spiritual matters as well? Based on what you wrote I would say, you may wish to reevaluate what you think you know. Pray after repentance to God for clarity. I’m not telling you what to do but, if I were you I would be real cautious about teaching others that which is not of God. Our Father in heaven holds those who teach to special account! Unlike what is tolerable according to America’s First Amendment truth and accuracy is a requirement of preaching God’s Word.

      Offered out of love,

      A Student of the Word

  • Guitarilla

    Lyn Leahz has had the sky falling tomorrow for the last ten years and still people keep reading her non-prophecies.

    • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

      She should change her name to Lady Doomsday, or something along those lines, more fitting.

  • Andoron

    Chances this message came from God: about the same as Obama admitting he’s a spoiled crybaby. Chances Lyn’s discernment level is worse than a gerbil: 100%.

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      Barry does admit he’s a spoiled crybaby… every time Michael spanks him with the paddle. :twisted:

  • mastwow

    no nation is perfect but there is no nation like America, what she has done past 100s of years, not just what obama clintons bushes did past 24 years. (of course these are only stooges for their masters)
    God fearing people shed blood for the nations of the world, preaching Gospel to the nations of the world, martyrs who have died for the nations of the world, they all are seeking and praying in heaven on behalf of America.

    Focus on God. Careless what devil is accusing against America, because God has heard the prayers of the saints in heaven and on earth.

    Yes, eventually God will judge all nations including America but for now, God has his plans unfolding as we speak.

    There are pastors like this one, who claims he knows something but they are nothing but fear-mongering morons who want nothing but America destroyed. In order to do that, they have to make believe first that this is the destiny of America, death and destruction of America.

  • Pink Slime

    Hello Angle#2,

    Charlie here. I don’t know how you can get God to talk to you. I always got to read his Bible for Him to talk to me. Wanna share the secret? :lol: :lol:

    But this guy mentioned “Christmass”. This is a Catholic PAGAN holiday. Did you know the Bible specifically WARNS you about this church in many verses?? It is the PHONY PAGAN church of men!! This proves he is still under the sway of his mother church. You know that “mothership” thing??

    But I struggle with my past too. Yes, I admit I have a “doughnut” problem. I will never forget the day I threw a full box of fresh doughnuts away right after I bought it. Trying to prove something about me, then I thought, I could have gave it to the homeless. The guilt is with me this very day. :roll: :roll: <- :wink:

    All kidding aside Angle#2 did you know if you say your love Yahusha He says you will keep MY commandments? Do you really keep His commandments? Do you know what HIS commandments are? Does this pastor know what they are?


    Charlie (got D's and F's in high school. Which I always thought meant Dumb and Fool) :lol: :lol:

    • Pink Slime

      :!: Oops Alert!

      …if you say your love Yahusha…<- :lol: :lol:

      • Andy

        you’d think you’d at least study the correct name – it is not Yahusha! you been talking to the wrong dude

        • Pink Slime

          It all depend on who you believe is the least ignorant and whether you choose to be that way yourself.

          I believe in certain writers and, to me, seem a little less ignorant than yours and each will use his own “backup” researchers to make their point. So it all depends on who you want to believe.

          It’s too much to explain here and I probably could write several pages, but you do have to be careful when converting from one language to another.

          I know they say the meaning is more important than the pronunciation, and it was written in Greek so it was OK and all that blather, but was it?

          In Daniel it was written it would be sealed up (the word) till the time of the end.

          • Andy

            fair points,, and while the author of that link has a Phd in Semitic languages, no doubt others similarly qualified may disagree with him on various grounds and reach differing conclusions

            i guess i would have imagined the bible, being the perfect word of god, would have used the correct name and you wouldn’t need to rely on or turn to the mere interpretations of men

          • Cintus Supremus

            One might even say:

            In Greek, His Name is Ιησούς

            In English, His Name is Jesus

            The direct translation of the Greek Ιησούς with the modern anglicized ‘jee’ pronunciation of the Common Greek IOTA ETA combination yields ‘Jesus’. That is a perfectly acceptable and valid rendering of the English transliteration from the Greek Name Ιησούς, just as Ιησούς is (at the very least) a perfectly acceptable and valid rendering of the Greek transliteration from the Hebrew name יהושע.

            But to argue as you have done, and your cited author has done, we can be absolutely certain His Name in Hebrew is יהושע, is an invalid argument because His Name never appears in the Hebrew Old Testament, of a certainty. We may only deduce the conclusion (and it may be an error) that His Name is יהושע in Hebrew. יהושע (Yehoshua) was indeed a fairly common name among Ancient Hebrews. But the Name of Jesus in Hebrew may in fact be an uncommon name — one which the authors of New Testament Scripture rendered as Ιησούς.

            For these reasons, it is never a wise decision to correct anyone’s settled-upon pronunciation of His Name. Look closely and you can see the Hand of God at work in this very issue, such that in all likelihood, unless we’re dealing with His Name in translation, everyone alive today has it wrong.

        • Anonymous

          Andy, he likes to be known as Jesus, to us.
          My 3 year old son apparently died in his crib one night,
          because the next day he gave his mother and I a heartwarming
          SHOCK. Having never really discussed Jesus with him at his
          young age, he told us both that he died last night but told
          us that Jesus came to him and gave him the choice
          to go with him to heaven to live with him, or to stay
          with his Mommy and Daddy. He said that he told Jesus
          that it would make his Mommy and Daddy cry if he
          left them now, so he wanted to stay with us! So,
          since Jesus told my son who he was and identified himself
          as “Jesus” to a little one who had no knowledge of him,
          I would say that Jesus, likes to be known as Jesus then eh?

        • Anonymous

          Same anonymous as above for Andy. One more short story
          proving he likes to be known as Jesus.

          Many years after the event above, like almost 25 years
          later, I was working at a nightclub.. The owner of the
          nightclub was going through some hard times. His
          club was losing money, and his wife had just filed for
          divorce. He called me in his office one night to relate
          the story of how the night before, he was going to
          commit suicide. He said he put his gun to his head,
          and all of the sudden, a beautiful figure appeared
          before him and told him to stop what he was doing.
          That club owner was a muslim, and he was shocked
          to tell me that it was Jesus that appeared to him
          and told him that all would be fine and to trust in
          him, and that all would be fine, and to stop his
          attempt to take his own life. Again, this figure
          addressed himself as Jesus to him.. So, he does
          seem to identify to that name, when presenting

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      OHHHH PINK!!!
      The cops you could have bribed!!! :twisted:

      • Mayhem

        Momma says dohnarts are the devil.

  • allendaves

    123’s of true Christianity (simply because you “confess” it does not mean you actually are, the devil has deceived many of his own children to believe they are Christians 2Tim 3:5)

    #1 “ONE” not triune: Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called … the everlasting Father ….The son & father are the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!

    “WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh!


    The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural).Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense

    Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Note: The spirit of Christ is the sprit of God and the holy spirit that is why Christ said “I will come to you” (to comfort them, because Christ is the comforter). The spirit was standing next to them in flesh… ….latter it would come to them to be inside of them (inside of their flesh as the spirit we are given)…..that is why. he would send the spirit…… However, Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

    NOTE: don’t be that one in prov 26:12 over my use of the word “fool” here prov 18:13 ( ) “But but, the gospel of John…the Gospel of John …look look…” which is quite ironic since the gospel of John does not leave ANY room for multiple different persons of Jesus and father. However the gospel of John does leave a few verses that facilitate God’s promise in 2 Thess 2:11/ Isaiah 66:4 (take note of “HAND” in verse 2,14..You just can’t make this stuff up…God is surely laughing at these fools; Ps 2:1&4)

    ……Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is…..

    TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…No, Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

    - Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5;

    - A Favorite tool for pathological liars is to use incongruent definitions or create oxymorons out of synonyms such as “a person” and “a being” so as to claim that your god is THREE DIFFERENT PERSONS but ONLY ONE BEING: Which is (1) no different then trying to claim that “THREE DIFFERENT CARS” is “THE ONE VEHICLE” (2) blatant demonstration of the dishonesty & sorcery these children of hell will employ with “a strait face” (which is in part what it means to be a pathological liar)
    ……but, ah i remember how this game is played… “God is three in one” (or 1in 3 or 3in one et al) should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions and vain imaginations have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into your image!

    You can download the complete FREE book from

    #2 SECOND COMING Thou Fool! “I come quickly” so “Hold fast
    till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 yrs I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And
    they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES.
    2Thess 2: 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12. That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.



    #3 There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups :

    (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

    (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

    (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
    will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

    Predestination….its true..its all true…download here

    • Andy

      god the father (mind) god the son (body) god the holy spirit (soul)

      we are all just such a trinity – mind, body & soul in ONE being – made in gods image, right?

      • maxwell

        …andy said, “we are all just such a trinity – mind, body & soul in ONE being – made in gods image, ”
        …This can only be true If one is truly unified in himself.

  • The Real Deal

    “Shaken to the core!” Ooga booga! Oh the adjectives.

    Scaring the people again, huh Leahz?

  • Ray Joseph Cormier

    And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.(false beliefs about God in Judaism, Christianity & Islam written some 500 years before Islam, the 3rd arm from the Jewish/Christian religious record appeared)

    For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth (the 1%, Presidents, Prime Ministers, CEOs, and other Idols of the People) and of the whole world, (the rest of Humanity) to gather them to the Battle of that Great Day of God Almighty. (the war is already underway between Judaism, Christianity and Islam leading to the climax of that Great Day)
    Behold, I come as a thief. (when you least expect it)
    Blessed is he that watches, and keeps his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
    And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
    Revelation 16:13-16

    Armageddon was derived from Har Megiddo, located in Judea and Samaria of occupied Palestine 2000 years ago. Israel as a kingdom disappeared some 800 years before Jesus walked in that area during the occupation.

    Har Megiddo/Armageddon still exists as a physical place in this material world, but is now under the control of temporal Israel re-created from the Bible after an absence of some 2800 years. After all those years, the occupation of Judea and Samaria in Palestine is still an unresolved, violent, open wound in the Middle East and this material world.

  • Martus

    The British empire wove itself into many corners of the world and when the commoners rebelled against the kings and queens chopping their heads off they took a step back, set up the masons and other secret societies to rule in their stead.

    Daniel tells us where the AC comes from:

    The Lion(England) will have it’s Eagle (US) wings ripped off (US War of independents) and later a lion will stand up as a man and the mind of a man will be given to him, see prince’s coat of arms for the standing lion king, the same prince who has said that when he becomes king he will be known as the defender of all faiths i.e. savior of the world.

    Also in Revelation it says that the Beast (Daniel:who consumes the whole world- UN) will have a lion’s mouth and that the number of the Beast is the number of a man, this lion beast man of Daniel.

    The power structure of the pyramid seems to be the triangle at the top away from the main pyramid:

    the ruling monarch -> the royal garter->

    Commoners (remainder of the pyramid) Masons other secret societies running governments and other top positions in the military and even in the religious institutions.

    Note the ruling monarch is also the the supreme governor of the Anglican church of England and affiliates. Also in the Catholic faith the Jesuits are another secret society who are in charge of Catholicism through the pope.

  • The Watcher


    • Deputy Dawg

      No man ascends to heaven but Jesus. Perhaps you could benefit from rereading the bible’s book of John, or at least the following passage:

      John 3:12-15 (KJV) “If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.


      • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

        What about all the people that lived before Heaven & Hell was invented?

  • Illuminatovanni
    The Messiah has been here since 2011 that is why the world suddenly change and why the year 2016 really spiked in major events.

    his name means Word of God

    You have to seek him and then you will know

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      Ah, excuse me…
      The Book PLAINLY says ALL will be returned to their spiritual bodies when He returns…
      If He has been here since 2011… why am I, and YOU, sitting here on FLESHY BOTTOMS?
      his name (like how you didn’t think him important enough to cap the first letter).
      Why would I want to seek out an obvious fraud and charlatan?
      Seriously… Get out of the CULT you’re in and do some studying of YOUR OWN!
      The ONE point I raise, blows Re-Re outta the water. :wink:

  • atomant

    l need help.lf l eat a box of donuts does that make me a glutton.?Will l still inherit gods kingdom if l persist in eating boxes of donuts?

    • Mean Old SOB

      That depends on the size of the box and the size of the donuts…

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      Give one to a cop… No gluttony!!! :lol:

  • patann

    Behold I Will Strip Their Leaders And Leave Them As In Their Birth

    Amen! Amen! Jeremiah 37:8, 1998 was her hand writing on the wall, December 25th 2001, blood guiltiness weighed, measured, guilty and sentence, that in 190 months, meaning 15.10 years, 2001-2017. Including Obama’s Administration, 07/24/2008 awarded two weeks and seven years, now expired, there’s something about Cameron. That’s something cataclysmic enough to end her and the Western world for 190 years right into both a palehorse, to Islamic/Antichrist reign, see Rev. 17:12-18, got Him, got Jesus yet? Apb, see more here,

  • charlie2dogs

    i am sick of religious fanatics spewing their doom, gloom, hate, death, and destruction, religion has played the biggest role in destroying this civilization by idiots who accept it.

  • The Watcher


  • my2pesos

    Believed Not ~ Be ‘evil’ Noted
    Believed Not ~ Bet ‘vile’ Done
    Believed Not ~ Be ‘devil’ Note

    • my2pesos

      Be lie vet Don ~ Not believed………..(AG)

  • Arcflash

    Your headline caught my attention but as soon as I saw the source, FACE PALM. Doh! Bye!

  • Mean Old SOB

    @Andy…Josephus, a historian of the time of Jesus, speaks of Pilate AND Jesus. Now, granted, no one alive today ever met him nor can they PROVE he ever existed but it’s safe to, yes I know, Assume he did live during Jesus’ time.

    • Cintus Supremus

      Been there, done that.

      Andy has concrete welding goggles on and a head thicker than granite.

      I’ve tried TNT.

      Nothing works.

      • Mayhem

        Not to mention Andy will pull an exact word criterion whereby it doesn’t matter that the Romans never mentioned swathes of historical figures.

        When it comes to supporting Andy’s appeal to ignorance fallacy the only fact that matters is the paucity of Messianic references

        Check it out, Andy, you’re committing two logical fallacies in a single argument. Philosophy, Andy, get you some.

        • The Clucker

          Looks like Andy has more than his feet in his mouth. Too bad he didn’t change his socks.

          • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

            Seems more like he’s up to his boxers now.

          • The Clucker

            Indeed, Mr. Artichoke.

  • Anonymous

    “Man Given Message” video contains no specific news or prophecy, just general malaise. For an hour.

    • nomorelabels

      Fraud…she needs more subscribers. She is quite clever at misleading.

  • Anonymous

    “Even More Dangerous Than Ever” video assumes that numerical tables are their own dimensions, and measurements change them.

  • nomorelabels

    Unfortunately, Lyn continues to be obsessed with these matters. She and many others, continue to believe the narrative that goes something like this: God is pissed, and anyone who does not bow to his demands will be tortured, in an endless fashion.

    It really is that simple and sick, but those who believe it do so out of fear. Can you blame them? How can one trust that this angry monster will not turn against them for any reason or for no reason? Lyn appears to be caught between the same fear BUT, she knows how to attract followers and she uses these manner of fraudulent hollywood style fictional stories in order to gain them. It is pure BS.

    Don’t be deceived…it is ALL advertising…ALL of it. Nothing she has ever produced has had reality attached to it, only stories about destruction, death and fear. Useful tools to manipulate those who live in fear.

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      Don’t forget the cash-flow! :wink:

  • truck driver

    Unrepentant Christian will be given over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, but the mans soul will be saved on the day of the Lord. 1st Corinthians 5 something

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.