Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

On the main problem with particle physics

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Particle physics divides reality into 1. “elementary particles”, 2. “composite particles” and 3. “forces” (see below from Wikipedia). This is different from our traditional division of reality into only 1. “particles” and 2. “process” in dividing “particles” into “elementary particles” and “composite particles”, and dividing “process” into “force carriers” and “force”, thus distinguishing two kinds of “particles” and two kinds of “force”, whereof one “force” is a “particle” in the form of a “carrier” (eg, “gluons”).

The main problem with this distinction is that it conflates “pattern” and “process” (ie, “object” and “kind”) in its “elementary particles” by the “force carriers”, because if this conflation indeed is real (ie, if there are such “elementary particles” out there), then it is also possible to decide both the position and the momentum for such ”elementary particles” at the same time, contradicting both Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation and the “nature” of such imaginary particles. And, furthermore, then time is neither relative, because “pattern” and “process” are then indistinguishable. The distinction is thus actually falsified by the fact that time is relative.

I bet this is the reason why Einstein choosed to not introduce a “Higgs’ particle”. This kind of “thing” is actually the exit of consistency and the entrance to Russell’s paradox; it is the interface between consistency and consistent inconsistency.

The fundamental problem for particle physics is that a particle in reality is orthogonal to a particle in our minds, because a particle in our minds is a representation of a particle in reality (see Magritte’s painting “Ceci n’est pas une pipe”). The fact that particle physicists can’t understand this fact means that they simply can’t see the forest among all trees. (This is also the reason why it’s so simple to pull out their wrong-thinking).

As usual, I trust you correct me if I’m wrong. All comments are welcome.


Source: http://menvall.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/on-the-main-problem-with-particle-physics/


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 3 comments
    • Neo

      Our physical universe in 5 words: Motion in a fluid space.

    • Menvall

      We can build many imaginary models of what reality is (ie, consists of and functions), but all of them that only rest on classification, like particle physics, are bound to contain a paradoxical contradiction, as Russell’s paradox explains, if we don’t differentiate orthogonal levels of classes, as Linnean systematics and object-oriented programming do. All such models are, furthermore, unscientific in being untestable, since we can’t test what something is, but only what things do. What a thing is do we actually decide by classification before we test what things do. It means that particle physics (independently of whether it is correct or not) is paradoxically contradictory and as such in practice an infinite recursion (ie, endless loop). It actually mimics reality instead of modeling it.

      So, what our physical reality “really” is appears to lack an answer per definition. The place where the answer should have been appears to be empty per definition.

      (Please, correct me if I’m wrong).

    • Menvall

      After contemplating the implicit question Neo answered in his comment, ie, how our physical universe can be characterized, I arrive to “a computer program”, wherein our interpretation of it can be characterized as a browser’s interpretation of an internet site (like this). And, in this characterization, class-realists, like particle physicists, believe that html-code can be conflated with script-code in a single code (corresponding to Higgs particle), because they believe that an internet site is real, instead of an interpretation. Class-realists, like particle physicists, thus appear unable to distinguish what they perceive from how they perceive it, and thus also unable to understand the concept “interpretation”. This inability is, however, understandable, since they conflate this difference already in their axiom that classes are real. Today, The Great Conflater himself (ie, Peter Higgs) have moreover been awarded the Nobel Prize for an ALMOST empirical verification of his neck-breaking conflation. This absurd story will really be interesting to follow. Is it really Higgs particle that they almost have found?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.