Profile image
By The Mermaid's Tale
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Higher resolution discrimination: The GOP wants to allow employers to require genetic testing

Thursday, March 16, 2017 8:03
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

This morning, Ed Yong published an article that takes on issues that we at the The Mermaid’s Tale care very deeply about.

Link to article

I have lots of other thoughts… like about how this fits in so nicely with (not all of) the right’s racist/eugenics inclinations.

And juxtapose this view from the political right where there is full-on acceptance of actually-more-than-genetics-can-even-deliver against their anti-science politics and policy…

It’s like science is totally fine for Republicans as long as Mother Nature is a dictator.

If it’s more complicated than that, then deny it, defund it, bulldoze it. The reality is, genetics is largely probabilistic; it is not a dictatorship. It’s just so hard to convince people that it isn’t. The ideological drive to justify behavioral differences and socioeconomic inequality with Nature above all is just too strong. If it’s Nature, then we don’t have to do the hard work of addressing the problems because Nature is Nature is Nature. This is really old thinking that really new knowledge (both through lots of science and lots of lived experience and lots of humanities and lots of art) has overturned but has not managed to catch on all that well. Part of the trouble is that new knowledge includes increasing understanding of genetics so the ancient beliefs can just be spouted in new-fangled science jargon.

This is really hard to write about today as all the stories about the proposed (and highly probable) budget cuts to science and the arts are blasting through my newsfeeds. It’s overwhelming me today. I’m feeling hopeless and angry on behalf of science, art, knowledge, medicine, humanity, humans, children, teenagers, grown-ups, geezers. It’s too much today.

But, back to Ed’s article, I do need to put this here because it was mentioned that I used to teach with 23andMe:

I don’t teach with 23andMe anymore. I was doing it for as long as my university would pay for the kits. It was totally voluntary and they had to read Misha Angrist’s book before deciding whether to go through with the testing. It was so powerful for teaching evolution, genetics, anthropology, etc… and we critiqued the hell out of it. My university said I needed to pay for the kits through course fees from now on. Before any of these threats to GINA, I decided not to do that and to stop using 23andMe. Now, even if my university reconsidered and funded the kits, I still wouldn’t take it up again as a teaching tool.



Source: http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2017/03/higher-resolution-discrimination-gop.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.