Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

England football leaders criticised for ‘sham’ diversity plan

Wednesday, March 8, 2017 3:32
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The FA has been threatened with the loss of public funding unless more woman and ethnic minorities are brought into the decision-making process.

England football leaders were criticized Monday for introducing diversity reforms that campaigners say still fail to ensure minority groups are adequately represented in the decision-making process.

Kick It Out, English football’s anti-discrimination group, said the Football Association’s planned overhaul of its board and council appears to be “sham” and “won’t satisfy minority groups.”

The FA has been threatened with the loss of public funding unless more woman and ethnic minorities are brought into the decision-making process. The House of Commons has already declared it has “no confidence” in the FA over its failure to reflect modern society in England.

The FA Council will add 11 members to ensure it “better reflects the inclusive and diverse nature of English football,” the governing body said. The FA also plans to guarantee three places for women on its board and restrict members to three terms of three years. But there will not be “proper representation of minority groups” even after the board is redesigned, Kick It Out chairman Herman Ouseley said.

“I would not trust these bodies to fully deliver transparent practices and the changes are likely to be a sham,” Ouseley added in a statement. “All the historical evidence suggests this, so I have no confidence in the proposals. I know that all minority groups will feel aggravated at the hands of the football authorities.’

In the council’s current 122 members, 114 are men, 92 are aged over 60 and only four are from ethnic minorities. And the council, which FA chairman Greg Clarke is pushing to hold sessions in public in future, has to approve the proposed changes. It also has to comply with the government’s new code for sports bodies. But ministers must tread a cautious path to avoid FIFA sanctioning England if there is deemed to be government interference.

“If (the government) say `This is unacceptable,’ I don’t know who is going to do better and if you trust government to come in and run football, yabadabadoo, let them have a go,” Clarke said. “Whether FIFA can do anything, you’d have to ask a lawyer. … If we go out of our way to annoy them and they want some payback they could cut up rough.”

Clarke described his blueprint as a “Once-in-a-generation opportunity to fundamentally change the way football works” and urged the FA Council to pass the changes next month.

“I’ve had that conversation from someone saying, `you can’t force me,”’ Clarke said. “I said, `Try me. Take me on. In the court of public opinion if you think you can keep stuffing the council with grey-haired white men.”’

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.