Dog's Breakfast at Tiffany's

While passed off as a “romance,” this movie was poison to heterosexuals. It set the 1960′s template where women were given permission to lose their minds and men were forced to rescue them. From that point on, it was all about their needs.

In the movie, the heterosexual Adam and Eve are portrayed in homosexual terms. Essentially they have to travel a homosexual obstacle course in order to find heterosexual love and marriage.  For 1961, this movie is sick, sick, sick. Let me count the ways:

1. Holly Golightly, played by Audrey Hepburn, is a prostitute. Her appeal is strictly based on “beauty” and occasional witty repartee. The prostitute part is glossed over and she is portrayed as a “party girl.” She is looking for some nebulous security represented by the store Tiffany’s.  She spends her time looking for a rich husband. We are supposed to believe this woman is attractive?

2. Her suitor, Paul Varjak, played by George Peppard, is a writer. He is also a prostitute, supported by a richer older woman, played by Patricia Neal doing her best Ayn Rand. In other words, heterosexuals are prostitutes, who must get used to selling their souls in order to survive.  They both agree they would marry each other for money in a minute if they had any. “I need money and I’ll do whatever it takes to get it,” Holly vows.

4. There is a sick subplot where Holly is really from Texas and was married at age 14 to “Doc” played by Buddy Ebson, a man easily 40. She claims the marriage was “annulled” but obviously they had a sexual relationship.

5. In order to make this horseshit palatable to heterosexuals, Holly and Paul have to overcome their moral compromises and find their way to each other. But Holly is a pain-in-the-ass to the end.  Even after Paul dumps his gigolo gig, finds a job and declares his love, Holly is set on going to Brazil with a rich heir she has met. When he dumps her, she is intent on going anyway to track “the 50 richest men in South America.” She tells Paul that  she doesn’t want to belong to anyone or be put in “a cage.” “I don’t know who I am.”

7. This is the homosexual message of the movie. Get used to being a whore. Forget about marriage and family. Women have to find themselves. This is the way the novel ends. But in order to sell the movie to unsuspecting heterosexuals, they tack on a reconciliation. Paul tells her she is a bitch and walks away. She chases after him. Women love rejection. 

The reason my generation had to “search for our identity” is because our primary identity as men and women (protectors and providers, wives and mothers) was being constantly attacked and eroded by the Illuminati. The institution of marriage was designed  to provide for women and children, so society can successfully procreate. Most gays want neither marriage nor children. Marriage is a distinctly heterosexual institution; it is being redefined as gay in order to destroy it.