Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Gaystapo Hit Pranksters with $106 million Nuisance Suit

Sunday, February 12, 2017 8:34
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

20160703_154125_zpszz7d0ysl (1).jpg


(Left, Acts of gross indecency are ignored because, as agents of societal dissolution, gays are a protected class.)
 TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT of TRIAL 
“G” informs us that, last summer, Bill Whatcott infiltrated the ‘Gay Pride parade’ in Toronto, disguised in green body suits. He and a few fellow “Zombies” = they called demselves = handed out thousands of Christian tracts, disguised as “condoms”. 
They managed to get away with it, and get out of there, before any trouble started

A few months ago, George Smitherman and Douglas Elliott sued Bill Whatcott and John Doe / Jane Doe for $104 million in a class action lawsuit, claiming that everyone in that parade – including Justin Trudeau in his capacity as Prime Minister of Canada – suffered “mental harm” by the actions of Bill Whatcott and his band of merry pranksters. The first stage went ahead last week … submissions by Elliott and Smitherman as to why it ought to be certified as a class action.  The thing is laughable from the first instance, the very definition of “frivolous and vexations” .. yet … in this absurd political climate, it is ominous that it got this far.”

bill-whatcott (1).jpg

(henrymakow.com) 
Friday was the second day of the hearing into the merits of the $104 million dollar lawsuit against me for infiltrating the Toronto homosexual pride parade with accurate information about the downside of homosexuality and the life saving Gospel while disguised as a “gay” zombie.

To see the redemptive work that got Bill Whatcott and his zombies sued for $104 million dollars go here: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10526

The hearing didn’t have the most pleasant beginning. The court clerk who was not very pleasant on the first day of the hearing began the second day by warning my supporters that if they made any noise the would be thrown out of the courtroom. No one was making any noise and no one argued with her. My side was well attended with around ten supporters. The homofascist side only had Christopher Hudspeth and no supporters in attendance.

GregDouglas.jpg

Homofascist lawyer Doug Elliott, (right with husband Doug)  started his arguments with his false allegation that I accuse all Liberals of child sexual abuse. Elliott also made much use of testimony from one of my zombies who decided to identify himself and agreed to submit himself to cross examination by the homofascist lawyers without a lawyer of his own. Elliot used my zombie’s testimony to bolster his argument that my material was extreme hate speech. Unkown to me, I guess my zombie was passing out flyers of his own, as according to Elliott my zombie “found my flyer to be too extreme.” I guess in an earlier exchange with my zombie in Quebec according to Elliott, I commented my zombie’s flyer was “too boring as it lacked a picture of an anal wart.” At that point I nearly gagged on some water as I tried not to laugh.

On a more serious note Elliott used my zombie’s testimony to build a case for conspiracy, reading excerpts from the zombie’s testimony that I swore them to secrecy and engaged in a long period of planning. Elliot argued my zombie’s testimony regarding my planning and secrecy was compelling evidence in favour of an order to compel me under threat of contempt of court to divulge the rest of the names of my other zombies, financial supporters and friends who helped in other ways. Elliot argued I had no respect for the law, parade rules or the welfare of homosexuals. Elliott also accused me of not mentioning the mass murder of homosexuals in Orlando three weeks earlier, unlike the other parade participants who Elliott alleged were mourning the mass murder.

child-homos.jpg

(Decadent Toronto prosecutes people who object to subjecting children to this.) 

According to Elliott because my flyers were hate speech and because I used deception to gain access to the parade my supporters had no right to privacy. 

During these arguments I actually noticed the court clerk was staring at one of my female supporters an awful lot. After awhile the court clerk got up and went to my female supporter who was quietly texting and ordered her to put away her smartphone or she would be immediately ejected from the courtroom. I noted the clerk never asked me or George Smitherman to put away our phones and we both used ours to text quietly. Nor did the clerk ask the Lifesite News journalist to put away her phone that could have been used for texting and tweeting (which journalists routinely do during hearings and trials). An articling student (I think) was taking notes and used her phone to quietly text or google something and she was not harrassed either. In spite of the double standard my supporter immediately apologized and put away her smartphone.

624_trudeau2_2.jpg

(left, unhinged Prime Minister Trudeau imposes his lack of values on everyone) 

Half an hour later I saw three police officers arrive and then two of my supporters were removed from the courtroom. I wondered what was happening so I quietly left the hearing to see why my supporters were being removed from the courtroom. When I discovered the court clerk (who was needlessly hostile for two days) called the police to remove my two supporters I immediately pulled out my camera to record the event and get it on the public record that my supporters did nothing wrong to merit having their right to observe an open court proceeding violated. I vouched for their character and behaviour and demanded they be let back in but to no avail. The police ordered me to put away my smartphone and the court clerk was belligerent and out and out lied that my supporters received multiple warnings and dirsrupted the court multiple times.

When it was obvious we would get nowhere with the court clerk or police I asked my unjustly expelled supporters to wait around until lunch. During lunch I told my lawyers what happened and then two of my male supporters and I accompanied the two expelled ladies to the court office where the women made the case they should be reinstated. After lunch my two ladies went back into the court and the court clerk ignored us.

zombies.jpg

My lawyer argued the Saskatchewan Human Rights prosecution of my speech was not relevant to this case as Saskatchewan Human Rights law is different from Ontario civil litigation law and the context and content of my flyers delivered in the homosexual pride parade is different from Saskatchewan. Dr Lugosi made strong arguments in favour of free speech and the need to follow the law and not prosecute speech, rather than make new law to restrict speech even further.

Justice Perrell expressed concerns about the rights of Whatcott supporters being exposed to such a massive financial liability as a $104 million lawsuit for the simple “crime” of donating a few bucks to my cause or offering me a bed during my travels. By the afternoon the arguments were wrapped up and me and my supporters went out for a coffee. We all pray that God will help Justice Perrell to arrive at a just judgment. The decision is reserved for a later date.

“Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 6:11


Source: https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/02/gaystapo-pride.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.