Profile image
By AmmoLand (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Law Professors File Brief Opposing 9th Circuit Rehearing in Second Amendment Lawsuit

Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitLaw Professors File Brief Opposing Ninth Circuit Rehearing in Second Amendment Lawsuit Challenging Alameda County Gun Store Ban Firearms Policy FoundationFirearms Policy Foundation

Sacramento, CA -( Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) announced today that it has joined Law Professors Randy Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center), Robert J. Cottrol (George Washington University Law School), Brannon Denning (Cumberland School of Law), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City University School of Law), and Glenn Harlan Reynolds (University of Tennessee College of Law) in filing a legal brief opposing a full Ninth Circuit rehearing in the Second Amendment lawsuit Teixeira v. County of Alameda, which was decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in May.

In its panel decision, the Ninth Circuit reversed a dismissal by federal District Court Judge William Horsley Orrick III, holding that the district court should have applied heightened scrutiny in evaluating whether or not the County of Alameda, California’s ordinance banning gun stores within 500 feet of any residentially zoned district, school, day care center, any other firearms sales business, liquor stores, or bars was an unconstitutional infringement of Second Amendment rights.

“The right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a second-class right,” wrote Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain in the decision, quoting in part the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark McDonald v. Chicago opinion. “Thus far…. the County has failed to justify the burden it has placed on the right of law-abiding citizens to purchase guns. The Second Amendment requires something more rigorous than the unsubstantiated assertions offered to the district court.”

The law professors’ brief, filed today, argued in part that “The panel opinion applied standard constitutional principles to the Second Amendment, just as they have been applied before to the First Amendment, to reproductive rights, and to other rights. There is no reason for the en banc court to consider the question anew.”

Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who has written and taught extensively about the First and Second Amendments, wrote the brief on behalf of the amici Firearms Policy Foundation and law professors. Before joining the UCLA faculty 20 years ago, Volokh clerked for Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the U.S. Supreme Court. He also operates the popular legal blog “The Volokh Conspiracy,” now hosted at the Washington Post.

A copy of the brief can be viewed or downloaded at

About the Firearms Policy Foundation:

Firearms Policy Foundation is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. FPF’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the People’s rights, privileges and immunities deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition, especially the inalienable, fundamental, and individual right to keep and bear arms.

For more information, visit:

This post Law Professors File Brief Opposing 9th Circuit Rehearing in Second Amendment Lawsuit appeared first on Shooting Sports News .


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.