This bill is schedule to be heard in committee the afternoon of November 15, 2016.
Since 2005 at least 31 similar bills have been filed in 18 states, none of them having been passed into law because the concept cannot be integrated into existing production lines safely or in a cost effective manner. Illinois’ own legislature wisely declined to embrace its own share of these bills, most recently in 2008.
Though the bill does not specify the manner of marking bullets and shells, leaving those problems for others to solve, the most commonly mentioned method is via laser etching. In fact, one of the founders of the company behind this concept, Ammunition Coding Systems (ACS), mentioned laser etching as the method he envisions in a February 28, 2008 interview. Neither the sponsor nor ACS has given any obvious thought to the potentially disastrous results of introducing a laser into an environment filled with explosive ammunition primers and highly inflammable propellants.
Both Representative Harper and ACS seem equally unaware of the current manufacturing method of randomly mating bullet to shell casing from bulk material hoppers, a process actually illustrated by an ACS Power Point and supplied to DNAInfo:
Randomized components, of course, cannot be mated to each other in ways creating a match.
Beyond these obvious impossibilities, IllinoisCarry opposes HB6516 for the following reasons:
HB6616 requires ISP to develop manufacturing methods and standards far outside its area of expertise. Acceptable tolerances for inevitable error, and methods of measuring such error, are left to the imagination.
The bill’s language inverts normal logic. Rather than offering existing technology as a solution to a problem, it assumes that the existence of certain tools defines the entirety of the solution. In reality, it establishes a mandate to create a technology for an application with no evidence that such technology actually can be created. In so doing, it establishes a “prove me wrong” precedent that should not replace our existing legislative processes.
Manufacturing experts agree that the most reliable mating of matched components occurs closest to the point at which they are mated. Achieving this level of reliability requires the use of a laser dangerously close to highly inflammable smokeless powders and explosive primers.
Re-manufactured ammunition, where casings are reused to reduce costs, will result in shells being coded at least twice with non-matching numbers, and possibly three or more times
Mail order and internet ammunition purchases, which are specifically allowed in the FOID Act, will be all but eliminated since out of state vendors have no need to stock coded ammunition
Rounds rejected through quality control will have to be replaced with rounds manually coded & assembled, and inserted by hand into each and every box missing the reject(s). Every human intervention introduces the possibility of additional error and increased costs not currently a part of the manufacturing process.
The estimated $0.02 cost per box of ammunition assumes expenses are amortized over 10 billion rounds or more. Manufacturers will not serialize all ammunition, reducing the amortization factor to a fraction of that projected, resulting in prohibitively large retail price increases.
Manufacturing methods developed by mandate of law and based upon ACS’s patent can potentially be subject to use fees and licensing requirements. If ACS chooses to prevent ammunition sales within Illinois, it can do so by simply refusing such licenses.
The bill lacks detail outlining how coding would be accomplished because Ammunition Coding Systems lacks the background needed in any of the manufacturing processes it hopes to impose on the ammunition industry.
IllinoisCarry calls upon the legislature to learn from its past, to repeat its prior wisdom and again reject this dangerous idea, to shun the political bullying that too often drove the process in prior years.
Help us make these points to the legislature by filing a witness in opposition now!
IDENTIFICATION: Enter your personal information. Enter “NA” for the Firm/Business or Agency and Title fields unless you are officially representing an organization.
REPRESENTATION: Enter “Myself” unless representing an organization.
POSITION: Unless instructed otherwise for a particular bill leave the description field at its default value “Original Bill”. Indicate your position by selecting the “Proponent” or “Opponent” radio button.
TESTIMONY: Select the “Record of Appearance Only” radio button.
If filing manually, complete the Captcha challenge and agree to the ILGA Terms of Agreement.
Join us on the IllnoisCarry Forum for discussion and updates.
About Illinois Carry:
The IllinoisCarry forum was started in April 2004 as a grassroots online action and discussion forum dedicated to advancing the Right to Carry in IL. We fight the battle for freedom on three fronts: the legislative front, the judicial front, and the electoral front. IllinoisCarry works closely with other organizations in Illinois that are working to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights. We encourage you to register on our forum and join the fight for your 2nd Amendment Rights in Illinois.