Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Hennessys View
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Killing Scalia: The Clinton Crime Family

Thursday, October 13, 2016 19:08
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Do you think the Clinton Crime Family whacked Antonin Scalia? You will soon if you let yourself read this and all the links. But first, a strange call I had last week.

Something Unrelated

At the end of our talk, the reporter said, “do you mind if I ask you about something else? It has nothing to do with my article, and I won’t write about it.”

“Uh, sure,” I said. I was a little apprehensive.

“Do you believe the Clinton’s killed Ron Brown?” the reporter asked.

Here we go, I thought. I’m going to  get called a conspiracy whack job.

“I have no idea,” I said. “I do know reporters who have looked into the case and no longer call the idea crazy. Even some skeptics trying to debunk the assassination story have come away uncertain. And I’m sort of a libertarian. I really don’t trust the government.”

“I don’t trust the Clintons,” the reporter said. “I covered them back in the early nineties in Arkansas. During the campaign in ninety-two. And in Washington some.”

We talked a little more. The reporter knew Ron Brown and liked him. “He told you the truth.” And she knows the Clintons. They are not like Ron Brown. The Clintons are mean people. And they lie to reporters. They lie to everybody.

Conspiracy Theory

I expected to be called a conspiracy theorist when I posted the Ron Brown story. Instead, I’ve received only worried acknowledgments that the Clintons are capable of anything, including assassination.

The reporter is a veteran, serious, established journalist. You’d know her name if I told you. Like all good reporters, she’s skeptical and meticulous. She checks things out.

And like everyone who’s checked into the Ron Brown assassination, she’s not sure. She doesn’t believe it was an accident, but she can’t prove it wasn’t.

Scalia Wet Work

Then today we learned that Hillary associates John Podesta and Steve Elmendorf exchanged emails that appeared to reference an assassination the day before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead with a pillow over his head at a remote lodge.


“Wet works” is spy-talk for “assassination.”

Scalia died in a lodge owned by a well-connected Democrat. Alex Newman wrote on The New American, February 16, 2016:

Suspicions and unanswered questions surrounding the surprise weekend death of pro-Constitution U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are swirling around the Internet and beyond. Many of the concerns center on the fact that the man who found Scalia’s body, businessman and Democrat donor John Poindexter, said the late justice was discovered with “a pillow over his head.” Also sparking alarm among some commentators and suspicious citizens are reports and official statements indicating that no autopsy will be conducted, despite contradictory claims surrounding the cause of death. Even the establishment press, apparently unfamiliar with the definition of the term “conspiracy theory,” has started reporting on the concerns and questions, albeit generally with a dismissive tone. Cries for an autopsy and congressional probe are growing louder, too, even as the White House, Democrats, and leftists waste no time in plotting to name a successor and tip the balance of power. The atmosphere is getting very tense.

Suspicious Death

You probably remember that a lot of suspicion surrounded Scalia’s death.

  • He showed no signs of health problems at dinner the night before
  • He went to be at 9:00 p.m.
  • According to Democrat John Poindexter, owner of the lodge where Scalia died, Scalia “refused” a security detail for the night
  • John Poindexter discovered Scalia’s body the next morning
  • Scalia was dressed with a pillow over his head
  • Scalia’s bed looked unused, as if he took a nap on top of the blankets
  • But he had a pillow over his head
  • And there was no autopsy

The government refused to allow an autopsy on Ron Brown’s body, too, after a US Marshall determined cause of death over the phone, via The New American:

Another top media personality asking questions was Michael Savage, among the top five most influential and most widely listened to talk-radio hosts in America. “Was [Scalia] murdered?” Savage asked during his program. “We need a Warren Commission-like federal investigation…. This is serious business.” He also called for an immediate autopsy, according to media reports. In a follow-up post on his website, Savage also wondered how the left would react if anti-U.S. Constitution zealot Ruth Bader Ginsburg died under similar circumstances with a pillow on her face in the final year of a Republican administration at a property owned by a mega-donor for the GOP. And in an interview with Savage on Tuesday, leading GOP presidential contender Donald Trump, when asked whether the candidate would support a Warren Commission-style probe, noted that “they found a pillow on his face, which is a pretty unusual place to find a pillow.” Trump did not say whether he would support a commission.

“There was no medical examiner present. There was no one who declared the death who was there. It was done by telephone from a U.S. Marshal appointed by Obama himself,” Savage said, outlining some of the many reasons why suspicion, whether warranted or not, is spreading like wildfire across America. “The question is, is it a conspiracy theory to ask questions that are so obviously in need of answer, or is it just common sense. And where is the common sense both in the press and the Republican Party. The answer is nowhere.” Of course, questions, by definition, cannot be a “conspiracy theory, despite the establishment media’s misuse of the term.

It looked in February like Scalia was assassinated, and it looks now like Team Hillary conducted the murder. Why else would “wet work” make Hillary Dems “buckle up and double down?”

The Clinton Body Count

The more you read about the Clinton body count, the more you believe it’s possible that the Clintons have ordered the assassinations of many, many people. Not just enemies, but people with information. People in the way.

Scalia was in the way. Now he’s not.

Call me crazy, but that conversation with a veteran reporter tells me the Clintons are capable of anything, including assassinations. And I think they killed Scalia.

P.S. If you’re wondering what Vineyard they’re referring to, see The Gateway Pundit.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment

    RIA Media: Washington is ready to provide free access to ISIS terrorists from Iraq Mosul, before the assault

    US and Saudi intelligence agencies have agreed to provide the ISIS terrorists a safe exit from Mosul (Iraq) before the assault, then the terrorists will be transferred to Syria, reports RIA News Post a diplomatic source in Moscow.

    СМИ: Вашингтон готов предоставить свободный выход боевикам из иракского Мосула до начала штурма

    According to the source, the capture of Mosul “entail transfer of terrorist groups ISIS from Iraq to Syria to counter the government forces of President Bashar al-Assad and the Russian group video conferencing.” According to some sources, Mosul assault (as directed by Obama) will be held in October.

    “In preparation for the operation in Mosul between US intelligence agencies and Saudi Arabia agreed that before the assault all militants will offer a safe route to leave the city with their families. And during the time of the assault coalition aircraft would strike only on a pre-agreed with the fighters detached building in the city, who are empty “, – said the source.

    “More than nine thousand insurgents ISIS will be transferred from Mosul to Syria’s eastern regions to follow a major offensive operation, which involves the capture of Deir ez-Zor and Palmyra”, – he added.

    The source suggested that the idea of ​​transfer of the terrorists in Syria caused by the desire of Washington to discredit the results that Russia has made in the SAR.

    “Apart from the purely political dividends for another purpose of this operation, obviously, will be to discredit the Russian VKS success, and, of course, is an attempt to undermine the position of President Assad. Washington needs something to counter the results of Russia in Syria, to try to minimize their importance “, – he said.

    According to available information, the intermediary and guarantor of a safe exit insurgents out of Mosul is the exploration of Saudi Arabia.

    Military analyst, Associate Professor Department of Political Science and Sociology of the Russian Economic University named after GV Alexander Plekhanov Perendzhiev: “I doubt the Saudis and the Americans will be able to implement his plan as” Islamic State “has the Iraqi roots, Mosul – their support base, and to leave Iraq, they certainly do not want to. Probably, there will be some kind of imitation – Mosul remain in the hands of terrorists, some of them just go to Syria, and the others pretend that surrendered. Americans can expect propaganda statements on the eve of presidential elections, Democrats will try to take credit for these successes. ”


Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.