" Of The 22 Most Frightening Plans For Attacks Since 9/11 On American Soil, 14 Were Developed In (FBI) Sting Operations." - N York Times, 2012

“One of the experienced marathon runners, Alastair Stevenson, reported that, at the start of this marathon, “there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village… There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn’t be concerned and that it was just a drill.” Stevenson added that he had never experienced anything like this in previous marathons in which he ran.

“Why were such exercises being undertaken, and why did they fail to prevent the very harm they were presumably set up to address? Were the bomb blasts part of the “drill?” Were the bombs part of a “sting” operation that went awry and inadvertently exploded? Or, were the accused young men acting wholly on their own? Their mother has stated that her older son “was controlled by the FBI, like for three, five years. . . . They were controlling every step of him.”

According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, in the past 10 years, there’ve been 20 Terrorist plots against the US.  Three of those plots were real but were discovered and stopped by private Americans.  The other 17 were created – and then stopped – by the FBI.

  We will probably not get the truth.

”No doubt another whitewash “investigation” will be undertaken by a “blue-ribbon” committee chosen by the political establishment. This committee will, like its predecessors, do its appointed job of calming the public herd and urging an extension of government authority to police an already overly-policed populace. But independent journalists, along with men and women who use the Internet and other technologies to communicate their searches for truth, may find out more than we have thus far learned from babbling politicians and make-believe journalists.”

If you want to be a Thinking American, and don’t really want to live under Martial Law, ponder over some of these statements:

“Truth is the first casualty of war,” 

Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. ~ George Orwell

Any investigation should begin with the question, cui bono (who benefits?) which then allows us to focus on even more pointed questions.

“Who did plan for and carry out these vicious killings and maimings in Boston? This is a question that will doubtless be shoved to the back-burner in political and media babblings. Those who still cling to such antiquated “technicalities” as due process of law, trial by jury, and (gasp!) clear evidence of criminal wrongdoing, will continue to be frustrated by such modern practitioners of Red Queen jurisprudence as Attorney General Eric Holder, who has informed us that “The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.” It is enough thatsomeone, somewhere, comes to a decision as to guilt or innocence and – as the untried prisoners at Guantanamo have learned – without being inconvenienced by attorneys, who will insist upon such niceties as examining evidence and witnesses.”

“”Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” – Einstein (on FBI sting operations?)

Walter Kaufmann defined as “decidophobia,” the fear of making decisions for oneself and rather letting the government make them for you… But:

The state is comprised of such a network of lies and contradictions, that it is unreasonable for us to expect truth from the mouths of its politicians – Butler Shaffer

”One should not accept something as true until it has been officially denied.”

They bomb us at home because we bomb them at home. Or do we set it up so we can bomb them at home?

When a politican speaks, people applaud; when a patriot speaks, people look for their guns

“Truth” is now negotiable, and a lie will serve as an adequate substitute as long as a sufficient number of people believe it. Facts that stand in the way of ends sought by the state must be repressed and shoved down the memory-hole. Those who raise questions that do not fit within the official script will be labeled “paranoid conspiracy advocates,” (or, as in the case of huge banking theft and fraud, “anti-Semitic”) making it easy for the normally-neurotic to take comfort in their ignorance.”

Or you can of course, go about your daily lives as you always have – under martial law.

SOURCE ARTICLE HERE http://lewrockwell.com/shaffer/