Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

SCOTUS Justice Kennedy retirement and #MidTerms2018 impact?

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 14:56
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Why the next SCOTUS pick needs to be JOAN LARSEN (MI)…

Might #MidTerms2018 Help #Trump get his next #SCOTUS nominee through?!?! Why do I suggest such? McLame refused to resign/retire when he should have and would have been replaced by now – and won’t be around for the Vote and therefore we only have 50 Republicans in the #USSenate! However, (ProAbortion Republicans) Collins and Murkowski will likely oppose the next Trump nominee who might help overturn RoeVWade. Countering that though – Democrats like Manchin and McCaskil (or even Stabenow, Michigan, which I’ll touch on further later) desperate for re-election this Cycle might feel it necessary, to cover their asses, and break from the usual and endless 100% Democrat OBSTRUCTION on any/all things and support Confirmation!!! If the Confirmation is dragged out until after November, Democrats will indeed return to 100% hyper-partisan Obstructionist mode!!

This could be a WIN/WIN. If McCaskil and Manchin oppose, it will make it easier to boot them in November and while one Trump nominee may go down to defeat for that to happen, he will obviously get his next/2nd choice through. And, if Republicans pick up more seats in the USSenate we may not have to then worry about idiots like McCain, Collins, and Murkowski, and get an even more solid/strong Conservative Confirmed than if we have to “compromise” to get their Votes!!

Now is the Time to Contact the WhiteHouse (https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/) & ASK #POTUS to nominate SOLID #CONSERVATIVE / #CONSTITUTIONALIST JOAN LARSEN (MI)(already on declared Trump Short-list) to the SCOTUS to replace Kennedy!!

Picking someone like (Michigan native) Larsen who is a Young Female (counters Leftwing GOP is Sexist false narrative and would serve for Decades on the Court), very qualified (formerly on Michigan Supreme Court, currently 6th Circuit (and therefore already been through a US Senate confirmation and makes it hard for Democrats to now claim they can’t support her when they did before), is already on Trump’s short-list, and would also apply pressure to Debbie Stabenow (D MI) to Vote for Confirmation (difficult for her to make excuses why Larsen shouldn’t be put on the Bench) potentially getting us to 51 YES Votes on Confirmation and avoiding a 50/50 split and need to bring in Pence to break a Tie.

There is the ability to turn the Democrats constant IDENTITY POLITICS PLAYING on its Head. What excuses will the Left make to say this highly qualified Woman, if Joan Larsen is the nominee, should be blocked from becoming the next SCOTUS Justice. #StrategicThinking

Justice #Kennedy has given ample warning of his retirement. This is not like a Death (unexpected vacancy) on the #SCOTUS. There should, at no point, be down to a 8 #Justices #Court. Confirmations MUST come and be completed before next SCOTUS Term begins!!

We cannot allow the Liberal Activists to have a 4-4 split Court for ANY PERIOD OF TIME screwing up a bunch of cases that should be decided but that won’t be as the Liberal Activists will nullify the whole process with 4-4 NON-DECISIONS!!!

Allowing the 4-4 split we’d have clearly benefits Liberal Activist Courts as the majority of the Cases coming up to SCOTUS are due to Liberal Activist Lower Courts overstepping their bounds and needing to be over-turned. In these Cases, 4-4 splits would allow those over-reaches to stand AND WE CANNOT ALLOW THAT!

Lastly, you will constantly hear the Liberals trying to cling to PRECEDENT!! That is because they have achieved much through Liberal Activist Courts that they want continued to be enforced as Law whether actually codified in Legislative Law or NOT! PRECEDENCE does NOT MATTER, no matter how long upheld, when/where (and most of) has been found on faulty Grounds/Rulin(s). It’s time for REAL CONSTITUTIONAL RULINGS to overturn Decades of Liberal Activist Judicial PRECEDENCE!! Need a quick/easy example? Dread Scott was upheld Judicial Precedence, ask a Liberal/Democrat – is that the Precedence they want to return to? (#CheckMate – hypocrisy exposed)

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question Razz Sad Evil Exclaim Smile Redface Biggrin Surprised Eek Confused Cool LOL Mad Twisted Rolleyes Wink Idea Arrow Neutral Cry Mr. Green

Total 3 comments
  • JLenardDetroit

    Justice #Kennedy has given ample warning of his retirement. This is not like a Death (unexpected vacancy) on the #SCOTUS. There should, at no point, be down to a 8 #Justices #Court. Confirmations MUST come and be completed before next SCOTUS Term begins!!

    We cannot allow the Libtards to have a 4-4 split court for ANY PERIOD OF TIME f****** up a bunch of cases that should be decided but that won’t be as the Liberal Activists will nullify the whole process with 4-4 NON-DECISIONS!!! Allowing the 4-4 split we’d have clearly benefits Liberal Activist Courts as the majority of the Cases coming up to SCOTUS are due to Liberal Activist Lower Courts overstepping their bounds and needing to be over-turned. In these Cases, 4-4 splits would allow those over-reaches to stand AND WE CANNOT ALLOW THAT!

  • JLenardDetroit

    For those that consider themselves PROLIFE…

    If Trump holds firm and nominates a Conservative as he should (rather than cave and cater to Susan Collins) this Confirmation process will finally expose all those fake, phony, fraudster, liar, Democrat #PLINOS (that can then be appropriately targeted for their lying about being ProLife in 2018 and 2020)!!!

    Demand Trump show that he really is ProLife as he claims (and not also just a PLINO) by demanding the USSenate approve one of his nominees on the existing list of 25 (Conservatives/Constitutionalists).

    Ginsberg may not Die anytime soon, which could potentially give us another chance at this – but we cannot risk that that chance may not come during Trump’s Presidency. WE CANNOT PASS UP THIS CHANCE!!!

  • JLenardDetroit

    “Affirmative Action” #JimCrow in Reverse…
    And yet another one of those “PRECEDENTS” (based upon Rulings made on faulty grounds and UNCONSTITUTIONAL) that morons like Susan Collins says we need to adhere to! NO WAY! Hey Libtards, #DreadSCott was “precedent” at one time too, you think that precedent should be brought back and enforced?!?!?

    #RuleOfLaw… I didn’t hear what Mark Levin had to say about Precedent (seems many are talking about whatever he said), but I have been saying for weeks now… Someone needs to ask Susan, since #DreadScott was precedent, does she want us to return to that?!?! Precedent doesn’t mean s*** when it was founded on faulty Ruling(s)!!!

    There is no guarantee Ginsberg will Die off anytime soon, therefore we cannot pass up this chance to insist a Conservative be put on the Bench.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

Top Global

Top Alternative

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.