DEBUNKING MOLTEN METAL

1. There has been no evidence of molten metal found at the WTC complex. The EVIDENCE actually contradicts the possibility of molten metal (of any significant quantity) during and after the destruction of the WTC, from 9/11 onward.

2. Not ONE image or video exists of large pools of molten steel.

3. This is an image showing the basement of WTC 2: http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/010918_3946_hole_s.jpg There is no molten metal.

4. The US government thermal map images are without a doubt doctored.  http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/hotspots-compare.jpg Zone F is the same area as this empty, damp hole in a FEMA picture filed 9/18/01. http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/010918_3946_hole_s.jpg Where’s the molten metal?

5. The Stairwell B survivors completely contradict claims of molten steel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvdNHaOBGk4 In Stairwell B on the 3rd floor of the North Tower, 16 people lived amid the avalanche of concrete and steel.  If thermite and molten metal were dropping down, they wouldn’t be alive. Their testimony is of bits of dust debris falling around them. No heat, no explosions and no bright white flashes as would be expected if thermite was used. After the towers “collapsed” or more accurately, turned to dust, the survivors found themselves looking up at blue sky. Not surrounded by molten metal.

6. There were no steam explosions when rain fell on the area where molten metal was supposed to have been in the immediate period following the destruction of the WTC. Enormous amounts of water were hosed on Ground Zero, if there had been molten metal, there should have been a steam explosion with all of this water: http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/NYC14401_lake.jpg http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/NYC14164_lake.jpg  Would water (either fire hose or rain) have coexisted with molten metal? Answer: No. There would have been multiple steam explosions. This fact completely disproves claims of pools of molten steel. When liquid water comes in contact with a very hot substance (such as lava, or molten metal) it can flash into steam very quickly; this is called a steam explosion. Such an explosion was probably responsible for much of the damage in the Chernobyl accident and for many so-called ‘foundry accidents’.  http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt4.html#steam

7. Thousands of tons of paper stored in the WTC floated to the ground unburned. After the destruction occurred the paper was left in the dust.

8. The large pieces of debris, likened to meteorites that are alleged to be fused molten steel by Steven Jones contain papers with legible type.

9. If molten metal existed at Ground Zero, would the hydraulics on the cleanup trucks have worked? Answer: No. Mechanical Engineering handbooks show the temperature of hydraulics to fail at a fraction of the temperature of molten metal.

10. If workers’ boots melted because the ground was so hot, would their feet have survived? Answer: No. If the temperature was hot enough to melt the firefighters’ boots, their feet would have been incinerated.

11. Much of the evidence for molten metal at Ground Zero seems to come from eyewitnesses who are on government payrolls rather than physical evidence. This is not reliable. http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt4.html#DRG http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60

12. Steven E. Jones knowingly and deliberately included a doctored image in his 2006 9/11 report with the caption “Workers evidently peering into the hot “core” under the WTC rubble” presenting it as evidence of molten steel: http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/jones_firemen.jpg The original image is merely workers using flash lights: http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/5575.jpg Steven Jones also used this image as evidence of molten steel: http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/WTC%20Molten%20Metal%20-%20Fact%20or%20Fiction/32_JONES_leak-resized.jpg Steven Jones fails to mention that NIST admitted doctoring the image. In addition, Jones cropped the photo and removed NIST’s caption that read “The intensity levels have been adjusted.” Jones used the colors in the photo for scientific analysis, yet NIST admitted adjusting the intensity levels. Is this good science? On top of that, why did Jones hide the fact that it was doctored?

9/11 shill Steven E. Jones fooled the truth movement into believing the false and inadequate thermite and molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated. If the cover-up perpetrators went through the trouble of creating false molten metal stories, would it not make sense for them to also distract people from what really happened? Wouldn’t the perpetrators “condition” the truth movement into thinking certain ideas to be “crazy”? What better way for them to keep the real truth a secret!

WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction? Analysis of the Evidence by CB Brooklyn

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60