The Ugly Face of Eco-Fascism – Step Forward Natalie Bennett

Eco-Fascism is a term which describes perfectly the ethos of today’s Green Nazi Party

Eco-Fascism is a term which describes perfectly the ethos of today’s Green Nazi Party

by Neil Foster | CPG – Hub – | Tuesday, 18 February, 2014

It was only a matter of time before the real agenda of the Green Party manifested itself.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26187711

Thankfully, at least some in the mainstream media seem to be getting the message that Bennett and her party are little short of Fascists. Perhaps the Green Shirts will be the order of the day at their next conference?

Bennett has now become the overtly Fascist mouthpiece for a party that achieved the inglorious heights in the last general election of a single, solitary seat in parliament with a total of 285,616 votes in total. To put this in context, the British National Party, of whom incidentally I have no affiliation with, received 564,331 votes without attaining a seat. I’m simply using the BNP to show that the Green party are only half as popular as a party seen as Fascist in its ideology. To the Greens this is seen as a success and recognition of their policies as at the previous election they gained no seats in the previous election.

So why are they allowed to have so much influence in Britain today?

Current Green ideology came to light in the heady year of 1989 as the Berlin Wall was dismantled to allow the spread of Communism to the West. Its head was, and still is, former Communist Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, who along with Maurice Strong, a wanted fugitive in America, drafted up what was to become The Earth Charter.

http://green-agenda.com/earthcharter.html

Natalie Bennett, having taken over from the proud ex-leader of the Green Party who is happy to be compared to a Communist and I’ve no doubt that Bennett is equally as proud to paly the part of a Fascist. Whatever colour flag either wishes to wave, Marxist Socialism is at the core.

Bennett and her cohorts believe that we all have to live frugally and ‘in harmony (balance) with nature’. They also believe religiously that the world is overpopulated with the same Malthusian cult mentality.

The Earth Charter mentioned above was compared to The Green Ten Commandments. Another example of Ten Green Commandments is carved into the Georgia Guidestones.

The first of these states that we should:-

• Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature

The last states that we should:-

• Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature

http://www.thegeorgiaguidestones.com/Message.htm

The Green Party firmly adhere to the notion that the theory of Thomas Malthus, that the world could not support life beyond that which the Earth could supply in the way of sustenance, is still valid today. This has been irrefutably shown to be a discredited and much criticised theory, but one that the Green Party refuses to divest itself of.

“In An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in 1798, Malthus predicted population would outrun food supply, leading to a decrease in food per person.

This prediction was based on the idea that population if unchecked increases at a “Exponential rate” (i.e. 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, etc.) whereas the food supply grows at an “Arithmetic” rate (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc.) (See Malthusian catastrophe for more information.) Only misery, moral restraint and vice (which for Malthus included contraception) could check excessive population growth. Malthus favoured “moral restraint” (including late marriage and sexual abstinence) as a check on population growth. However, it is worth noting that Malthus proposed this only for the working and poor classes. Thus, the lower social classes took a great deal of responsibility for societal ills, according to his theory. Essentially what this resulted in was the promotion of legislation which degenerated the conditions of the poor in England.”

How many times have we heard Green cult members trot out their overpopulation mantra?

It should also be noted that Malthus also advocated that the sick and disabled should not be treated and that they should be left to die which would help reduce the amount of resources used by them to the benefit of other groups in society.

http://overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth

It’s also interesting to note that Greens are firm supporters of abortion as a means of curbing population growth under the guise of ‘Reproductive Health’, which is also another ‘Commandment’, carved on the Georgia Guidestones:-

• Guide reproduction wisely, improving fitness and diversity

When we look at the Green Party’s ‘Vision for Britain’ there are a number of points of interest, which display the utter hypocrisy of Bennett and her fellow cult members with regard to the sacking of government employees. I’ve no doubt however that this ‘lunatic fringe policy’ will percolate down throughout society to ensure that everyone adheres to the Church of Climatology’s gospel.

Some examples:

“We are committed providing wellbeing and prosperity for everyone, in harmony with nature”

Sacking people will do nothing for their wellbeing or prosperity.

Under their section on rights and responsibilities they state that this means:-

“Safeguarding the diversity and wellbeing of both communities and individuals.”

It goes on to say:-

“Treating all people with dignity and without discrimination”

Diversity (of opinion) means that you have to respect the rights of individuals to have a different opinion to you and acknowledge the right of free speech without the threat of sanctions such as losing your job because you don’t agree with someone on a specific issue. That is the basis of democratic debate. Discriminating against someone by removing them from their employment is a blatant act of discrimination based on nothing less than the prohibition of freethinking and free speech.

In relation to free speech the Green position is apparently spelled out here:-

“A Green government will safeguard basic civil and political rights of all citizens, (since when did we become citizens?) such as access to justice – including legal; representation and legal aid – and FREE SPEECH.” (My emphasis)

It goes on:-

“We will also protect basic social and economic rights such as access to food, housing, healthcare, education, transport, EMPLOYMENT and nature.” (My emphasis)

The hypocrisy is astounding!

Ironically, Natalie Bennett will be taking to the podium in London this Wednesday to demonstrate against Atos and their ‘Work Capability Assessment’ program.

When it comes to their hypocrisy on Atos, we find that it’s just as blatant

“A caring, inclusive and democratic Green society will enable EVERYONE to do valuable work…”

I suppose that means the disabled too?

In terms of the Green’s energy policy they state that:-

“We will control energy bills and create more jobs by investing in warm and efficient homes, energy storage and SMART GRIDS and in renewable energy supply….”

The reason why I’ve highlighted Smart Grids is because Atos are the world’s largest suppliers of Smart Meter systems in the world.

I wonder if the Green Party will be receiving campaign funding from Atos Worldgrid for the next general election?

Unfortunately, the section on the Atos Healthcare site in relation to ‘Wellbeing’ has disappeared but as readers may have read in a previous article on Atos it stated that:

“Health, work and wellbeing is a cross-government initiative to protect and improve the health and well-being of WORKING AGE PEOPLE.”(My emphasis)

There is no differentiation between those disabled or elderly and the employable age being made here. The only ‘wellbeing’ is to be that of those able to contribute to society, by working, in the view of Atos.

‘Wellbeing’ is liberally sprinkled throughout the Green ‘Vision for Britain’ but I would suggest it’s only for the benefit of those who agree with the pseudo scientific garbage of the Green Party.

Natalie Bennett finishes her hateful and tyrannical rant on the BBC with two words:-

“sick joke”

I would suggest that Bennett and her Eco-Fascist colleagues are the “sick” of our society and unfortunately Fascists aren’t known for their sense of humour.