No jab, no job…no school or travel, no freedom

Government forced vaccinations previously occurred in 1905

Compulsory mandates dictating how Americans live their lives is something few of us — who have taken our liberty for granted — have ever considered.

The reality is, however unwilling, we are now wards of a democrat administration, with a president who is so incoherent, he is likely to be removed. On the rare occasions he is forced to interact with the media, Joe Biden’s team provides the mentally and physically frail Biden with crib notes, which he has difficulty reading, often wandering off the stage in a state of confusion.

As of July 27, 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued these new, more restrictive mandates (currently concealed as “recommendations”) that fully vaccinated people wear a mask regardless of the level of transmission and “universal indoor masking for all teachers, staff, students, and visitors to schools, regardless of vaccination status.”

There is actually a legal precedent for this freedom crushing overreach of which few of us are aware. In 1905, during a deadly smallpox epidemic the U.S. Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts could fine residents who refused to receive smallpox injections. In 1901, a smallpox epidemic swept through the Northeast and Massachusetts reacted by requiring all adults receive smallpox inoculations subject to a $5 fine. Children could be exempt by the presentation of a physician signed certificate. Though people were far more compliant in those days, there was still a growing backlash to the compulsory mandate that official certificates of vaccination were required to go to work, attend public school, ride trains or even go to the theater. The Oyez Project provides this brief overview.

Read “President Dementia’ Is Getting Worse !!!” by Thomas Lifson, which includes a startling photo of Biden kneeling at the feet of a foreign leader.

Though there is a Constitutional consent contained in the 25th Amendment providing for the orderly transfer of power when a president is unable to fulfill the duties if the presidency, the prospect of radical leftist and constantly cackling Kamala Harris sitting in the Oval Office is not reassuring. During her brief stint as a California Senator, GovTrack had a graph showing her voting record as to the left of Socialist Bernie Sanders. Not surprisingly, it has been removed.