99.9% False Flag Hoax Paris Shooting - Exposing Concert Hall Eagles of Death Metal and Reporters

There’s no ‘could be’ about this being a false flag event, right down to the passport being left on the ground to be found. The fact that innocent people have been involved doesn’t seem to bother the planners, they will just spin it with compliant lazy media.

The NWO couldn’t wait any longer for a legit excuse to destroy Syria because there isn’t one and because their ISIS pals are getting pounded in Syria and are having to be treated in Israeli hospitals. This is threatening to spoil the atmos and finishing touches to their NWO carve-up. due to take place whilst all the parasites are in Paris.
One would be inclined not to attend, considering that there are hoards of mad islamic murderers roaming Paris with abandon. But then again all the attendees know the script and the pigs didn’t even look up from their carbon troughs.

The French think their air force is bombing ISIS training grounds in retaliation to this outrage against their people, when in reality the French Air Force are bombing Syria’s infrastructure, killing civilians and hampering the progress of legitimate forces. Now French politicians are allowing their electorate to be deceived and pushed towards a scapegoat…….those innocent Syrian/Iraqi/Libyan migrants who most probably lost their homes and business thanks to French bombs. Don’t look at what your gov’t is doing, just keep your eyes on those migrants eh?

Vive le …..ah forget it

^^^

Bigger pressing question.

What is a “True Flag” and how would one know when it has been perpetuated?

what really surprises me is France didn’t surrender

Is this the same women being used over and over again???

http://www.businessinsider.com/sandy-hook-elementary-shooting-newtown-connecticut-2012-12

scroll to second picture

http://nodisinfo.com/the-fake-dead-and-wounded-of-the-paris-france-terror-attack-hoax/?subscribe=success#blog_subscription-2

Now from the top scroll to the 12th picture

familiar?

Nothing in this video provides a 99% false flag conclusion. The fact that the reporters story changed a little bit, happens all of the time during a traumatic experience, plus the fact that he only saw the guns and remembered they were ak’s, is psychologically accurate. Imagine, gunmen showing up randomly and you see them from 20 yards or so away, and they start shooting randomly, you will look at the gun and not their face, just as if someone attacked you and pulled out a knife, you would pay more attention to the knife before you fled- but if you fought back and lived, you would likely remember his face.

This is all backed by psychological studies and observations. The fact that the reporter changed his story in small details from day one to day two, well think about it…Yes it makes total sense. He has had much more time to reflect on what happened, run it through his mind hundreds of times, speak his story in his second language, and maybe even talked to people who also survived the shooting, thus, altering the traumatic event in his own memory merely by hearing other people’s experiences. All scientific and explainable by researching memory of traumatic events from Day 1 to year 20. Because I guarentee 5, 10, 20 years from now, the story will change dramatically by this man.