Answer to the Debunking of the Catastrophic Methane Explosion Articles

The debunking articles narrowly focuses on two commentators on the Gulf Oil Spill event.

The problem has been the information obtainable from BP, and the US Gov.; including, the exclusion of any on site examination and testing by independent scientists.

BP has taken the fifth amendment, when pressed pointedly about any crucial information.

Regardless, there have been many expert opinions, based on factual inferred evidence that points to an extremely dangerous situation in the Gulf. While, perhaps the entire world is not going to perish in an extinction event. The real and possible dangers are existent, possible, and in some cases, already realized.

BP’s and the USA gov. actions have exacerbated the situation, by failing to disclose the information to the public, in order for the public to make a decision, or respond to the circumstance.

Anyone, who fails to recognize that the Gulf Coast populations are in danger, is truly wearing the tin foil, as the author refers to. It is a mistake to not report the complete danger, and actions of BP and the event, while attempting to debunk a hypothesis.

To the uninformed, it might seem to be an overstated event reporting, in the rest of the substance, of all the previous articles, which fully report, the best that they can, the “story.”

It really doesn’t have anything to do with politics, or the writer’s reluctance to express his libertarian views, what ever that means.

Or, his political credentials.

The reading public needs to wake up to an extremely dangerous situation. It is a fact that the reserve is the size (comparably) with Mt. Everest, full of methane gas and crude oil, which is overlaying a molten lava bed, which both the lava bed and the reserve are over the New Madrid fault.

Truly, who can say what will happen with the use of nuclear explosions to seal the leak ? Further, who can say how long it will gush forth ? Since, Our government refuses to make any conclusive tests on the water and air in the surrounding areas, and BP refuses to release any information, what the impact is, can only be ascertained by the dead bodies, and the antidotal reports of the people there. Well, I have included below, what some of the experts and reporters have stated to BIN in their articles, read them, and determine for yourself, what is true and important; because, if you don’t die in a world wide catastrophe, but die in this local Gulf event, then dead is dead. GAME over ! Towit:

Disturbing those deposits — say, by drilling an oil well through them — can turn that solid methane into a liquid, leaving the ocean floor unstable, explained [Carol Lutken of the University of Mississippi]. …

Continue

www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/st-pete-times-tsunami-rumors-disturbing-methane-deposits-can-turn-that-solid-methane-into-a-liquid-leaving-the-ocean-floor-unstable-says-scientist

Then, after I was vilified by some in the news media for reporting the fact that methane at some levels in the Gulf had reached 1 million times the norm, Dr. Kessler confirmed [July 20th] what my sources told me and even stated that there has not been this much methane in the water since the last mass extinction.

Now Kessler is unavailable and Texas A&M won’t talk. But I downloaded the page that A&M had up for about 3 hours and have it saved.

500,000 people worldwide have read DOOMSDAY: How BP Gulf disaster may have triggered a ‘WORLD-KILLING’ event.

The water can be coaxed to flame and methane levels 10,000 to 100,000 times the natural concentrations!

Natural gas content – methane, propane – elevated 10,000-100,000 fold over background levels.

Floating, dead pyrosomes.
 

Thanks to our source!

theintelhub.com/2010/07/19/gulf-methane-expert-says-water-flammable-methane-levels-deadly/

Leaks could mean the cap on the well has to be opened to prevent oil and gas from escaping elsewhere.
 

Continue www.zerohedge.com/article/breaking-robert-gibbs-confirms-bps-oil-well-leaking-top-seepage-2-miles-away

“Geologist: Depletion of BP Oil Reservoir “Unlikely”

- http

://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/

COOPER: Congressman Markey, on I think it was June 23, you wrote a letter to BP, one of the many letters you’ve — you’ve written to BP, that they haven’t really responded to.

And, again, I wrote back there on June 23, so that we could publicly disclose what the integrity of the wellbore is, we could publicly disclose what the integrity of the geology around the wellbore, so that we could better understand.

CNN TRANSCRIPT

archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1007/15/acd.01.html