Is There An Alternative to Toxic-Jab Vaccinations?

Vaccines and vaccinations need to be examined for various reasons by everyone, I think.

First and foremost, all vaccines contain chemicals and neurotoxins that should not be injected into infants or adults, e.g., formaldehyde—an EPA-declared carcinogen; mercury in the form of Thimerosal (49.6% Hg)—one of the most toxic elements in chemistry; aluminum—a neurotoxin; polysorbate 80—a proven anti-fertility agent in animal studies; foreign DNA from bovine, pig, dog, chicken, monkey, insects, and aborted human fetal cells (diploid cells), plus a roster of toxic industrial chemicals.

If the premise and practice of medicine is first do no harm, then it is quite obvious that the medical profession apparently is not aware of, nor does it read, the informational literature that accompanies vaccines called vaccine package inserts.

IF physicians were to study vaccine package inserts and compare childhood vaccines with the CDC’s VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) reports filed in the hundreds of thousands, doctors would see the harm they are contributing to by blindly accepting that vaccines are safe and do not cause harm or damage. The medical profession’s acceptance of scientific pap that toxic industrial chemicals can improve the immune system in infants, whose immune systems do not mature until around two years of age, simply is nothing short of Frankenscience.