MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ARE CRYING FOUL. CALLING THE CHLOROQUINE RESEARCH AS TAINTED!

 How does a scientist sabotage a study? Here is a look at a few studies that were pathetically run and loudly advertised as truth. One minor issue?  They were actually bogus studies that meant very little.

Reviewing the affects of aspirin by using tylenol  is exactly what one study did that reviewed phosphated quinine and pretended it was also chloroquine. This analogy is fair and eye opening! How else do you create fake science?  Give the life saving medication only when the patient is on his death bead and has sustained horrible damage already. Or how about intensionally under-dosing the medicine and then report that it was ineffective.  This is an old technique. See the Tokyo study on vitamin c and stomach cancer.  Deathbed only participants.  Then there is the double standards of medicine. The double standards of Ignoring the prolonged QT of other drugs, (a cardiac rythm issue,) while focusing only on the prolonged QT of chloroquine is another pathetic double  standard especially when you look at the consequences of getting this disease. Very many medications can prolong QT intervals but we don’t hear about those do we? In fact most people never heard of the QT interval until quinine and coronavirus became an issue. Now it’s a label, the QT interval; and a play-word tossed around like other disinformation labels that carry with it a negative connotation. That’s how drastic the double standard is. This is why a health care professional goes over the anti chloroquine studies and points out the pathetic divergence from true science. A fall from standards. This angry professional featured in the following video tears apart the recent papers on chloroquine and calls it the latest in B.S. coming out of Dr. Fauci and his minions. He shreds the basic set up of these reviews and studies, he identify the blinders used in the scientifc community to hide the truth, and exposes the double standards.  He illuminates the subjective content now so prevalent in review papers and frowns at the lack of objective results. The researcher in the following video is sponsored by https://www.kimbertouch.com/shop

Video: https://www.brighteon.com/0c34706d-5f2a-404a-a9d9-853cdddaaeb6