Anarchists are like religious believers, 100 percent oblivious to the biological roots of the human animal

hmmm.. if you were to open your favorite search engine and type in this phrase, “NO DUTY TO PROTECT”. Therein you would discover that the US courts, up to and including the supreme court have all consistently absolved the US government/state governments of it’s duty to protect YOU!
THIS dissolves any allegation of a social contract, wherein you trade loyalty and support in the state “fed/state govt” in exchange for protection!
There is no recourse WHEN “not if” they fail to protect you!!

Now lets discuss anarchy; Looking up the definition in Black’s law, 1st edition, we find the following..
1) the destruction of government; lawlessness
2) the absence of all political government; by extension, confusion in government.

When taken as a whole, most anarchists do not believe in political leaders. This doesn’t mean no rules/laws.. but ZERO POLITICAL LAWS or Malum prohibitum bs! Just common law WHICH EQUATES TO, NO VICTIM NO CRIME!

Now here’s a question you never pondered!

Why are there so many laws? here’s the answer
it’s most certainly the same everywhere, because all elected officials are the same, GREEDY!

Why are there so many laws? MONEY! Once upon a time, there had to be an ACTUAL VICTIM for there to be a crime! Well, those days are gone! Our legislators pass more and more laws every day! As reported on December 31st 2013, FORTY THOUSAND NEW LAWS TAKE EFFECT NATIONWIDE on January 1, 2014. Obviously in 2017 THERE ARE TENS OF THOUSANDS MORE LAWS!

All those newly LEGISLATED laws combined with all the existing LEGISLATED laws amounts to ten’s, if not hundreds of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN FINES! It also serves to keep the police, defense attorney’s, prosecutors, judges, sheriffs etc etc very very busy! It’s very very lucrative to create more MALUM PROHIBITUM laws, where they can fine you for doing something or not doing something!

Now back to those elected officials I referenced earlier. You remember them right? Well, here’s something you probably don’t know about those EVIL politicians. When you get pulled over and receive a ticket, get arrested for anything really, there is ALWAYS a FINE associated with whatever infraction you are charged with! Well kids, here’s why they make so many things illegal to do or not do, MONEY!

Elected officials have a retirement fund and that fund receives a percentage of EVERY SINGLE FINE, thereby FINANCING THE RETIREMENT OF EVERY STATE ELECTED OFFICIAL IN AND OUT OF OFFICE! Didn’t know that did you!?!! Most people don’t, hell, I didn’t know until recently.. I discovered this heinous scheme whilst perusing our ALLEGED laws “I’ll get back to the ALLEGED part later” and below is the statute along with a cut for the ELECTED OFFICIALS!

TWENTY SIX (26) PERCENT of ALL fines collected, go to the ELECTED OFFICIALS RETIREMENT FUND! * the percentage may vary in your state.

Can you say, CONFLICT OF INTEREST!!! It’s no wonder they pass more and more legislated FAKE laws EVERY CHANCE THEY GET! the more laws they make, THE MORE MONEY THEY MAKE!

OH, JUDGES ARE ALSO RECIPIENTS OF THE ELECTED OFFICIALS RETIREMENT FUND “that is funded by FINES on FAKE LAWS”

Arizona Revised Statute 12-120.31. Fees and costs; distribution

A. Fees and costs in the court of appeals shall be the same as supreme court fees and costs pursuant to section 12-119.01.

B. Fees charged by the court of appeals for electronic filing of documents and electronic access shall be the same amount as fees charged by the supreme court and are subject to the provisions of section 12-119.02.

C. The court of appeals shall retain 8.36 per cent of all of the monies it collects monthly pursuant to subsection A of this section. The retained monies shall be used to improve, maintain and enhance the ability to collect and manage monies assessed or received by the court, to improve court automation and to improve case processing or the administration of justice. The clerk of the court of appeals shall submit a plan to the supreme court that the supreme court shall approve before the court spends the retained monies.

D. Excluding the monies that are retained pursuant to subsection C of this section, the clerk of the court of appeals shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, all monies collected pursuant to subsection A of this section as follows:

1. 19.42 per cent in the judicial collection enhancement fund established by section 12-113.

2. 26.00 per cent with the state treasurer for transmission to the elected officials’ retirement plan fund established by section 38-802. The monies shall be transmitted by the state treasurer to the fund pursuant to section 38-810.

3. 46.22 per cent in the state general fund.

12-119.01. Supreme court fees; distribution

B. The clerk of the supreme court shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, all of the monies collected pursuant to subsection A of this section as follows:

1. 27.78 per cent in the judicial collection enhancement fund established by section 12-113.

2. 26.00 per cent with the state treasurer for transmission to the elected officials’ retirement plan fund established by section 38-802. The monies shall be transmitted by the state treasurer to the fund pursuant to section 38-810.

3. 46.22 per cent in the state general fund.

C. The supreme court may increase the class A and B fees prescribed in subsection A of this section.

________________________________________________________________-

Now about those LEGISLATED laws they pass, I said ALLEGED earlier! and here’s why!

Go to your state constitution, find the following; Be it enacted by the legislature of “name of state” OR, Be it enacted by the people of “name of state”.. this is called an enacting clause and gives ALL laws, AUTHENTICITY! Enacting clauses are antecedent to the formation of our country! The enacting clause is, according to their own law, supposed to be PUBLISHED after the title of a statute but before the body of the law. Look at your statutes, YOU WILL NOT FIND AN ENACTING CLAUSE PUBLISHED ANYWHERE!!!!

Without an enacting clause, how are we to know which laws are general or private? We can’t know and I suspect they REFUSE to publish statutes purposely without an enacting clause, so that we don’t know the origin of the law! Further, in most state constitutions, an enacting clause is not only required but MANDATED by the constitution itself! Any statute that is published without an enacting clause is no law at all! it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and we have no duty to follow any law that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is no duty to enforce an unconstitutional law BY ANYONE!

in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), to wit: Congress … cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

The Legislature, either by amending or otherwise, may not nullify a constitutional provision

Rost v. Municipal Court of Southern Judicial District of San Mateo (1960)

SUPREME COURT: U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431 a statute that regulates without constitutional authority is a nullity even though it be published in the books, recognized by the police and lowers courts, and even though it be unchallenged for decades.

Brookfield Construction Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.“

“Any arrest made without a warrant, if challenged by the defendant, is presumptively invalid…the burden is upon the state” to justify it as authorized by statute, and as not violative of constitutional provisions.State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695 (1969); Butler v. State, 212 So.2d 577 (Miss 1968)