Illegal aliens are voting, Trump is right, Number is irrelevant, Podesta email reveals Democrat concern, Washington Post 2014 article, “08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters”

Illegal aliens are voting, Trump is right, Number is irrelevant, Podesta email reveals Democrat concern, Washington Post 2014 article, “08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters”

“What is your threshold for acceptable voter fraud since 1 vote can win most elections?”…Citizen Wells

“In December 2014 there were 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country who had arrived since January 2000. But job growth over this period was just 9.3 million — half of new immigration.”…Center for Immigration Studies February 2015

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

The Democrats continue to lie about voter fraud as being a problem and illegal aliens voting.

But they were caught expressing concern about it in a Podesta email from Wikileaks.

They believed that Obama had ineligible voters in Colorado in 2008.

“On Thursday, May 14, 2015, John Podesta wrote:

High importance. I met with Jim and Mike in Denver. They are both old friends of the Clintons and have lots of experience. Mike hosted our Boulder Road Show event. They are reliving the 08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters. They want to organize lawyers for caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3563

From the Washington Post October 24, 2014.

“Could non-citizens decide the November election?”

“In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.

Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election/?utm_term=.c0f99f9d191c

1 illegal vote is too many.

Whatever the number, this must end and we must keep them out of our country.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/