Anti-Romney Candidates are Anti-Capitalism and Anti-Free-enterprise; for Shame!

The next POTUS–Mitt Romney

BREAKING NEWS!  The candidates who are anti-Romney have defined themselves as anti-capitalism and anti-free markets by going after Bain Capital.  This reveals the non-conservative backgrounds of these pseudo-conservatives.  They have taken the playbook of the liberal Democrats and Marxist-socialist Barack Obama and are applying these Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals tactics in the Republican primaries.  For shame!

For example, Newt Gingrich’s most favorite and idolized president is Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  As we all know, FDR was a progressive who furthered socialism in American through his make-work, spread-the-wealth programs.  He threw Americans of Japanese Ancestry into concentration camps.  He robbed the people with gold by forcing them to turn what gold they had into the government.  He created the social security program, which is an albatross around our necks today.  I can go on and on.  You get the idea.  Newt Gingrich is not a conservative.  He is far from it.

Rick Perry is a pseudo-conservative.  For goodness sakes, he was a registered liberal Democrat over a decade ago.  More shocking is that he was Al Gore’s national presidential campaign manager.  Unbelievable!  He also approved providing free college tuition to illegal aliens for crying out loud.  He is no conservative.  He is anti-capitalism and anti-free-enterprise.  This guy is a crazyman who does not deserve to be POTUS.  Plus, he as a very poor debater.  Obama will make minced meat out of this guy who is not yet ready for prime time.

Jon Huntsman is not a true conservative.  He is left of center.  He worked for Obama as his ambassador to China for crying out loud.  He has liberal tendencies.  He is anti-capitalism and anti-free trade.  He was working for the Progressive Democrats for nearly two years screwing up the U.S. economy with the crazy Obama economic policies.  He was in there causing China to screw the United States in unfair trade practices and manipulating the value of the U.S. dollar.  He is no conservative but is a pseudo-conservative instead.

Ron Paul is a wacko.  He has fairly decent economic ideas, but he has crazy ideas of isolationism and anti-military policies.  He would be as dangerous as POTUS as is Obama.  Ron Paul must not become the Republican standard bearer.  He would be dangerous as POTUS.  Just ask Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum.

Rick Santorum is not yet ready to be POTUS–maybe the next time around.  He lost big time in his U.S. Senate re-election race back in 2008.  What happened?  If he had won, he would be a formidable candidate.  However, he squeeked out a close second place in Iowa.  He will get beat badly in New Hampshire today (1/10/12).  He does not have a national campaign organization.  He does not have the finances.  Rick may be a good vice presidential runningmate to Romney, but he is not yet ready for prime time.  If he does well in South Carolina (first or second place), he will become a formidable candidate.  As of this point, Santorum is the only one of the above listed candidates who is closest to being a conservative candidate.  However, the next go-around in 2020 will be his time to be the POTUS.

These candidates who take quotes out-of-context are no different than ex-Congressman Alan Grayson from Florida who lost his seat in Congress because of his lies and quoting Republicans out of context.  Now, these primary Republican candidates above are using the same vile Saul Alinsky tactics in trying to wrestle away the front-runner status that Mitt Romney enjoys.  These Repugnant candidates are desperate socialist-progressives and will do anything that Barack Obama would do to win the presidency for a second term.

###