Obama’s Treasonous Islamic Activities

Following in the wake of the Boston Marathon Bombing, Muslim Americans now claim “wounded religion status” and fear of reprisals, and yet freely admit that 21% of America’s 7 million Muslims (1.4M) support Islamic extremism. And these are supposedly “Americanized” Muslims. Still, if you apply this figure to the 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide, the number of radical Muslims would equate to approximately 260 million Islamic fanatics. It’s also been estimated that fully 95% of the remaining Muslims support jihad as a means to restore the caliphate and a one-world Islamic religion.

So while it can be said that not all Muslims are terrorists, it can also be said that most terrorists are Muslim, which of course is contrary to Barack Obama’s patently false and deliberately misleading claim that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.

But let’s look at the numbers, just to be certain. As of February 28, 2013, there have been exactly 72,409 separate acts of terrorism resulting in more than 650,000 deaths directly attributed to Islamic extremists since 9/11/2001. And if for some reason you question this number as being unbelievably high or grossly exaggerated, consider this: 72,409 incidents divided by 138 months = 525 acts of terrorism per month or approximately 17 per day, which is not at all disproportionate when you factor in the 49 Islamic countries and more than 100 host nations.

Okay, so there are millions of Islamic fanatics just itching to pull the trigger on a Christian infidel. We’re still safe here in America, right?

As safe as one can be, but in 2012 the FBI estimated that there may be as many as 50,000 Islamic extremists running around loose in our country. Then again, the FBI has also designated the Muslim Brotherhood as an Islamic terrorist organization, and we all know that can’t be true because Obama himself publicly called for the overthrow of a friendly Egyptian government and then replaced it with the radical Muslim Brotherhood.

Could it be that the White House is attempting to confuse and diffuse the issue of Islamic terrorism by redirecting our attention elsewhere and away from the dangers of radical Islam? Absolutely!  By trying Tsarnaev as an American citizen, he is no longer a terrorist motivated by religion and instead becomes just another criminal nut case. In other words, the fact that both he and his brother killed innocent Americans in the name of the perverted religion of Islam is no longer legally relevant, and the terror bombing now becomes a criminal act.

Believe it! The Muslim-loving Obama administration did the same thing when they reclassified the 2009 Ft. Hood shooting from an “act of terror” to “workplace violence.” Remember? A Muslim fanatic named Nidal Hasan gunned down unarmed American soldiers while shouting “Allah Akbar!” – and now 4 years later he has yet to stand trial.

And let’s not forget that Obama has also reclassified the 2001 “terror attack” on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, which are now referred to as “man-caused disasters” with no mention of Islamic terrorism. In fact, Obama has forbidden the use of the words “terrorist, extremist, jihadist, fanatic and barbaric” and cannot be used in the same sentence with the words “Islam or Muslim.”

And while we’re on the subject, I’m sure you remember what happened in Benghazi just 7 months ago when 250 Libyan terrorists armed with assault weapons and RPGs attacked our consulate and murdered four Americans, including the American ambassador. Right? Well, it may interest you to know that the FBI criminal investigation by the Obama administration to “bring those responsible to justice” has been cancelled. In fact, the Obama administration now claims that those 250 well-armed Islamic terrorists were mostly peaceful demonstrators who were spontaneously influenced by only a handful of militant Muslim extremists who simply melted away into the crowd after the 7-hour long siege ended.

We Americans understand that the FBI, CIA, and a host of other U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies cannot constantly track tens-of-thousands of foreigners nor prevent every random act of terrorism. Nor do we expect our government to be perfect. But we do expect our government to preserve, protect, and defend our country as provided for in our Constitution, inclusive of the American people, and we do demand that it be competent, transparent and accountable – and to date the Obama administration has failed on all three counts.

It’s not a question of whether or not we possess the capability to defend our country and ourselves, but rather one of incapable, indecisive, and possibly treasonous leadership. And in this regard, we know little or nothing about the current occupant of the White House, Barack Obama – his deliberately obscured past, questionable religious beliefs and affiliations, personal and political agenda, or his true motivation. But what we do know, aside from his phony birth certificate, social security card, selective service registration, and three known aliases (Barack Hussein Obama, a.k.a. Barry Soetero, a.k.a. Barack Obama Onyango), is that he publicly supports Islamic terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda, Hamas, the PLO, and the Muslim Brotherhood, openly quotes from the Islamic Koran, finances military armament in Islamic regimes, and refuses to forcefully prosecute Islamic terrorists.

And as if this isn’t sufficient grounds for impeachment, consider, as well, these undeniable facts: Obama was born and raised as a Shiite Muslim and claims to have converted to Christianity at age 38 when “the precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to him” – thus comparing himself to Moses. And yet he rarely attends church except when it’s politically expedient to do so, celebrates neither Christmas nor Easter, openly mocks Christ and the Christian Bible, supports the building of a mosque at Ground Zero in NYC, signed an executive order enabling 100,000 Muslims to enter our country as political refugees (including 40,000 Palestinians), continues to support the “Arab Spring” uprisings, appointed more than 100 Muslims to high-ranking cabinet posts and positions of authority within our government and intelligence agencies, and now his former pastor and admitted close friend and mentor, Jeremiah Wright (Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ), freely admits that Obama was never religious and only attended church as a political expediency to garner the Christian vote.

And yet for all of this and more, there are still two (2) conclusive, undeniable, and damning facts that prove, beyond any shadow of doubt, that Barack Hussein Obama, the self-professed Christian, is in actuality a devout Muslim.

First, he gave his daughters “Muslim” names, Sasha and Malai, years after his supposed conversion to Christianity. Why would a converted Christian annoint his daughters with Islamic names if he were not, himself, a devout Muslim?

Second, and most damning of all, is the ring he wears on his left ring finger which bears the Arabic inscription: “There is no god but Allah” – which clearly demonstrates the significance of Islam in his life; that his life is dedicated to Islam. It also explains why he considers it to be part of his responsibility as president of the United States “to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear,” because all religious Muslims are by definition required to defend Islam.

The ring was first mentioned in a New York Times article in 2009 recounting the Obamas’ wedding. “Obama’s ring was not traditional, like Michelle’s, but an intricate gold design with an odd inscription.”

In fact, there is ample photographic evidence proving that he has worn this same ring since attending Occidental College in 1980, and a world-renowned expert on Islam states that the significance of using his Islamic ring in lieu of a traditional wedding band symbolizes Obama’s deep devotion to Islam – that Islam comes first – before love for his wife or his family (not to mention his country).

But how, one might ask, is it possible for Obama to be a devout Muslim when I have seen him eat pork, bacon and ham, and drink beer and other alcoholic beverages that are forbidden by the Koran? In fact, he has publicly renounced Islam in favor of Christianity. How, then, can he be a Muslim?

The answer is deceptively simple.

Have you ever wondered how Obama, who was born and raised as a Shiite Muslim, was able to supposedly choose to become a Christian and thus renounce Islam? Simple. A Muslim’s right to renounce Islam and to join another religion is called apostasy, and it is not permitted for Muslims to reject their faith. So if a Muslim were to leave Islam and adopt another religion, they would thereby be committing an unpardonable sin in the eyes of Islam.

In fact, and according to the Grand Mufti, “Islam prohibits a Muslim from changing his religion and it’s a crime that must be punished.” Changing religions from Islam to another faith is interpreted as an act of apostasy, and the Islamic mindset dictates that all such apostasies can undermine the foundations of Muslim societies.

As clarification, an apostate in Islam is a Muslim who rejects Islam after being either born into it or after embracing it as a convert from some other religion.  An apostate is looked upon as worse than an infidel who has never professed faith in Allah and Mohammad as his prophet or in any way practiced Islam. 

Apostasy in Islam is equal to treason.  In Islam, politics and religion are inseparably intertwined. A famous fundamental expression in Islam says it all, “Islam is a religion and a state,” and the Messenger of Allah said, “Whoever changes his (Islamic) religion, kill him.” In other words, imprisonment, torture (the cutting off of hands and feet), and execution.

There are, however, a few types of situations in which Muslims would not be counted as liable for rejecting the faith. Ignorant mistakes, misunderstandings about Sharia Law, and instances of coercion to renounce Islam would fall into this category. And of course the principle of “Al Taqeyya” makes the provision that any Muslim who renounces Allah and/or his prophet Mohammad to preserve his own life or to infiltrate the camp of his enemies, is not guilty of apostasy. Such is solely permitted in situations wherein the Muslim is giving lip service as opposed to the true feelings of his heart.  (See Sura 16:106)

To be specific, and according to the principle of “Al Tageyya,” a Muslim can pretend to be one of them .… to befriend infidels (in violation of the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief (in this case, Christianity) to prevent them from harming him.

Under the concept of Tageyya and short of killing another human being, if under the threat of force or when attempting to infiltrate an enemy camp or fool an enemy (infidel), it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to their faith. In this case, his mission will have been sanctioned by a high-ranking religious cleric and the following actions are acceptable:

Drink wine, eat pork flesh, and skip fasting during Ramadan.

Renounce belief in Allah and abandon prayers.

Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.

Utter insincere oaths.

And who might do such a thing? Muslims migrating to Western countries such as the United States under the guise of being “political refugees and students.” They will live and work in our communities, attend our schools, join the military, infiltrate our government and intelligence agencies, become naturalized citizens, run for public office, and pretend to be one of us – but they’re not – for in reality they are and will always be our most deadly enemies. Get the picture?

This being said, can there be any remaining doubt of Obama’s allegiance to Islam? If so, you will be shocked to learn what happened today in Boston.

Today, April 25, 2013, Obama’s loyalty to Islam has once again surfaced when FBI agents were shocked to see a magistrate “waltz into” the hospital room of Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarvaev and read him his Miranda rights.  Why were they shocked? Because the FBI was under the understanding that they would get much more time with Tsarnaev under the “public safety exemption” before he was read his rights. Adding to the shock: “They were getting crucial information after only 16 hours of questioning and were making valuable progress.”

Believe it! The FBI had no idea that the Justice Department was sending over the judge, the federal prosecutor, and the federal public defender, and were only 16 hours into what they understood would be a 48-hour period of questioning. The agents said they were in the process of getting valuable information, and that as soon as the judge-magistrate entered the room and read him his rights with his lawyer present, Tsarnaev stopped talking.

Further, FBI officials with knowledge of the proceedings say “they believe our national security may have been compromised by the decision to send that judge in there so soon after filing the criminal complaint.” And of course there is the legal question of “how can the Justice Department both prosecute and defend?”

And last but certainly not least, freshman Congressman Tom Cotton (R-AR) delivered some thought-provoking comments on terrorism and the Obama administration on Wednesday during a speech on the House floor.

“I rise today to express grave doubts about the Obama Administration’s counterterrorism policies and programs,” said the freshman congressman from Arkansas. “Counterterrorism is often shrouded in secrecy, as it should be, so let us judge by the results. In barely four years in office, five jihadists have reached their targets in the United States under Barack Obama: the Boston Marathon bomber, the underwear bomber, the Times Square Bomber, the Fort Hood shooter, and in my own state—the Little Rock recruiting office shooter. In the over seven years after 9/11 under George W. Bush, how many terrorists reached their target in the United States? Zero! We need to ask, ‘Why is the Obama Administration failing in its mission to stop terrorism before it reaches its targets in the United States?”’

Maybe now we can better understand what Obama meant when he addressed the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 25, 2012, just two weeks after the assault on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that claimed the lives of four American patriots, and told them that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

If not, then maybe the liberal Democrats and easily duped minorities who voted for Obama can offer a reasonable explanation for his treasonous actions.