Obama DOJ and FBI Spy Campaign: The New York Times Can't Even Keep its Lies Straight

The reason The New York Times published its “Crossfire Hurricane” puff-piece yesterday is obvious to those following along. Tireless investigators like Inspector General Michael Horowitz and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes are hot on the trail of unprecedented criminality by the Obama administration.

Some careful observers have identified multiple conflicts within the Times story, which was an obvious attempt by those implicated in the scandal to leak their way to a positive spin.

I’m finding the numerous false statements in this attempted whitewash of FBI behavior to be frustrating. An example. pic.twitter.com/B6oMWNLaKC

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) May 16, 2018

It’s an embarrassment of an article. The @nytimes should be ashamed to be stenographers for biased FBI and DOJ officials

EXAMPLE 1

NYT: Strzok writes a message in sentence case, with calm, detached air implied

REALITY: “OMG” and the entire message in excited ALL CAPS pic.twitter.com/3AJGicwdjs

— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) May 16, 2018

EXAMPLE 2

NYT: Carter Page “had previously been recruited by Russian spies” (this is used twice)

REALITY: SVR agents had tried to recruit him, failed, called him “an idiot”, and Page spoke to the FBI about the attempt. The SVR agents were arrested and/or expelled from the U.S. pic.twitter.com/npHocBvvmh

— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) May 16, 2018

EXAMPLE 3

NYT: @Comey met Trump in private “revealing the Steele reports”, as journalists had “obtained them”

REALITY: False. Trump was deliberately ONLY briefed on the salacious Moscow prostitutes allegation. This has now been admitted by @Comey himself (@BretBaier transcript) pic.twitter.com/lBB6yoINJn

— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) May 16, 2018

The use of National Security Letters (NSL) against the Trump campaign.

This is important – an NSL is a subpoena for records that does not require probable cause or the approval of a judge. https://t.co/17X5IM1pWq

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 16, 2018

Per govt policy, the following could have approved of the NSL:

1) Andrew McCabe

2) James Baker

3) Peter Strzok (maybe – if he was SAC at the time)

[Not an exclusive list.]

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 16, 2018

The storm has arrived, Bambi. @supahdupahfkyhttps://t.co/AEbBKw5xq9

Obama DOJ and FBI Leadership Referred for Criminal Prosecution for Clinton Email Cover-Up

Current Vegas odds of indictment:
McCabe: 1-4
Strzok: 1-3
Page: 1-3
Yates: 2-3
Comey: 2-1
Lynch: 3-1
Clinton: 4-1

— Doug Ross 🔵 (@directorblue) May 18, 2018

Yesterday (5/16), Mark Levin deconstructed the Times’ Leakapalooza in surgical fashion. Listen here.