T.L. Davis: Not For Me

A vaccine for thee, but not for me.

The coronavirus vaccine is not a vaccine, it is an injection of these contents, but these do not include graphene oxide. None of the sources I found admitted the inclusion of graphene oxide. If graphene oxide is actually in the injection and not listed or addressed in documentation about the contents, it is a crime against humanity. It’s a violation of the Nuremburg Codes and subject to like punishment, i.e., the Gods of Gravity. NIH explains the benefits of graphene oxide (GO) in this article in February of 2016. So, the idea that graphene oxide would not be considered to deliver the mRNA is ridiculous. And Pfizer with it’s record of accountability suggests otherwise.

In this report, filed in MIT Technology Review in December of 2020, evidence of their bias and manipulation are present. They do, however, admit that it is not your normal “vaccine” but a new way of defending against viruses using mRNA. The lie is put to their “safe and effective” narrative after six to seven months, during which, evidence of the devastating effects of the “vaccine” continue to show up along with the injection’s complete inability to prevent future infections of Covid, as attested in this news report of the fully vaccinated Democrat politicians who fled to Washington D.C. in order to forestall a vote on voter integrity bills before the Texas legislature, three (ultimately five or six) got Covid on the trip. (the sources cited, wherever possible, are intentionally from the opposition or hostile to the point of view of this article)

While the MIT reference tries to imply that the injection is little more than table salt and fat, they are relying on the stupidity of the American people and their unwillingness (they believe an inability) to research their claims and debunk them. The active ingredient is: nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2. If one looks up that ingredient, they might come across a plethora of positive articles concerning the Covid injection. Quickly, one recognizes that there are literally no countering articles in the search (DuckDuckGo). At the same time, there are literally hundreds of posts and articles online describing the dangers of the “vaccine.” As an observer of manipulation of data and the use of algorithms, one might quickly conclude that anything else is being scrubbed from the internet. Or, perhaps they are all correct and the adverse effects of the injection are non-existent.

More…