Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By A Radical Profeminist
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Catharine A. MacKinnon on "Lovelace", and the subject (not object) of the film, Linda Marchiano

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

This blog exists to challenge white heterosexual male supremacy as an institutionalized ideology and a systematized set of practices which are misogynistic, heterosexist, racist, genocidal, and ecocidal.

All that follows is a cross-post from Harvard University Press Blog.

09 August 2013

Catharine MacKinnon on Lovelace

pornographic film Deep Throat,
released in 1972, was a cultural sensation whose star, “Linda Lovelace,” was
said to put a girl-next-door face on the sexual revolution. But the actual life
of Linda Boreman, as depicted in the new biopic Lovelace, was one of beatings, rape, and terror. Feminist legal
scholar Catharine MacKinnon, author of such works as Toward a Feminist Theory of the State and Only Words, represented Boreman after she came forward with her
story, and later, with Andrea Dworkin, pursued civil rights litigation as a
means to fight pornography. We asked MacKinnon about Boreman, Lovelace, and the potential impact of
the film.
Q. You’ve noted that prior to the 1980 publication of Linda Lovelace’s Ordeal, you had no view of pornography
one way or the other. For those unfamiliar with her story, who was Linda Lovelace?
Lovelace” was the fictional name of Linda Boreman, later Linda Marchiano, who
was forced into captivity and made to perform fellatio and other sex acts by
pimps, including organized crime, so that pornography, notably the notorious film Deep Throat, could be made of her. The film was instrumental in establishing
pornography as culturally legitimate in the 1970s. After her escape, Linda’s
valiant opposition to the sex industry included chronicling her abuse in Ordeal and extensive public testimony. Her revelations enabled a change in the
way pornography was debated legally and socially, shifting the focus from
morality to harm.
Q. This
film comes decades after the landmark pornography civil rights hearings at
which Marchiano testified, as documented in
Harm’s Way
. Can you remind us what was at stake in those hearings?
anti-pornography civil rights hearings collected in In Harm’s Way created a space for people victimized by pornography
to speak about what had been done to them in its making or through its use.  Up to that point, the legal argument over
pornography had essentially only considered the freedom of speech issues.
The hearings
documented the inequality that is foundational to the industry: that the “speech”
of the pornographers is the use and abuse of the bodies of mainly women, who
were far from free and were not speaking for themselves. The consequences of
the distribution and use of the materials was shown to be equally silencing and
endangering to legions of women and children who are abused by its
consumers.  Thus the sexual exploitation
of women and children in making pornography is mass-produced through its
consumers to become violation of other women and children.
The civil rights
ordinances the hearings debated were passed several times, then found to
violate the First Amendment on the theory that the more harm the materials do,
the more protected as speech they are–an incorrect, indeed reversed, view of First
Amendment law. The ordinances could
still be passed and found constitutional today.

Q. What
was your involvement with the

I represented
Linda from 1980 until her death, was her friend, and continue to represent her
Estate and her children. Lovelace is based in part on our life story rights. It
shows Linda as human and credible, as she was not seen as being in life. All
she ever wanted was to be believed and respected, to have people face what
really happened and take steps to stop it. We see this film as a major step
forward in that process. Apparently, when you make fact into fiction, people
begin to believe it is true.

We participated
in the making of the picture, are proud of it and the people who made it, and
feel strongly that Linda would be proud of it.

Q. Gloria
Steinem has said of the film that the true story is actually much more violent,
but that the filmmakers “did the best they could.”
To the extent that the
trauma of Marchiano’s life had to be toned down to bring the film to a wide
audience, why is that a compromise worth making?

The filmmakers
had full creative control, which is as it should be. The film’s compromises
with factual accuracy are not mine to defend. Artists operate on assumptions of
what the experiences of audiences prepare them to see; sometimes audiences say
they want to see pretty standard tropes when they go for entertainment.

Through a
brilliant structure, Lovelace unmasks the myth that Linda was freely acting and
shows her enduring coercion and terror, trapped by lack of support from her
family and authorities. And it shows her victorious, getting free of what is increasingly
understood as sex trafficking. It shows the core truth of her story and her

Q. The impact of
the internet on the pornography industry has obviously been enormous, and this
film depicts an era much different from that in which we now live. With that
said, what would you hope that the
audience takes from the film?

Society is
substantially more saturated with pornography than it was before, as Andrea Dworkin
and I predicted in 1983 would happen if nothing was done to stop it. That means
we need a law like the civil rights law we proposed even more now than we did
then, because even more people are being violated as a result of the sex

Linda had no
rights over Deep Throat when it was made, and without the law we wrote for her
and others, she would have no rights over it today. And she is not alone–far
from it.
Once Linda is
seen as a human being rather than a sex doll and sperm spittoon, a process
Lovelace advances light years, we hope audiences will begin to consider that the
pornography industry traffics in a form of sexual slavery that is neither protected
speech nor free. Meantime, they will see an enlightening story as they enjoy a
very smart, splendidly acted, and good movie.

“An activist and writer at the blog, A Radical Profeminist”.


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.