James Carville: ““Wokeness Is a Problem and We All Know It”

Woke progressivism is an opportunity for us.

The Democrats have embraced Ibram X. Kendi and his doctrines and have gone full mask off with anti-whiteness and in doing so have severely undermined consensus antiracism.

Vox:

“I called James Carville hoping to get his thoughts on President Joe Biden’s first 100 days in office.

He obliged — then, one question in, brushed aside the exercise to talk instead about why the Democrats might be poised to squander their political advantage against a damaged GOP.

His failure to cooperate may have been for the best since the first 100 days ritual can sometimes lead to dull, dutiful analysis. What Carville offered up instead was a blunt critique of his own party even after a successful 2020 election cycle — a sequel of sorts to his fulminations during last year’s Democratic primaries. The longtime Democratic strategist is mostly pleased with Biden, but it’s where much of the party seems to be going that has him worried.

“Wokeness is a problem,” he told me, “and we all know it.” According to Carville, Democrats are in power for now, but they also only narrowly defeated Donald Trump, “a world-historical buffoon,” and they lost congressional seats and failed to pick up state legislatures. The reason is simple: They’ve got a “messaging problem.” …”

ANTIRACISM IS ANTIWHITE.

Who could look at Joe Biden’s America and disagree?

That’s what some of our people have been raising awareness about on the internet for the past 20 years. Those people have been vindicated by the Joe Biden administration. If you are White, the term “antiracism” is now synonymous with learning to hate yourself and your country and civilization and your entire race and working against your own group interests to defeat other people like you.

Wokeness is essentially “race suicide”:

“In 1902, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt called race suicide “fundamentally infinitely more important than any other question in this country” and argued that “the man or woman who deliberately avoids marriage, and has a heart so cold as to know no passion and a brain so shallow and selfish as to dislike having children, is in effect a criminal against the race, and should be an object of contemptuous abhorrence by all healthy people.” Likewise, in 1905, he argued that a man or woman who is childless by choice “merits contempt.”