New Covid claims

Rense.com, Graphene Oxide and Covid Vaccines, Craig Paardekooper, The apparent magnetisation of the injection site has been noted and investigated by
scientists in Luxembourg. Links: https://rense.com/general96/graphene-oxide-is-toxic-to-human-blood.pdf and https://www.efvv.eu/images/content/2021/0617/study-on-electromagnetism-of-vaccinated-persons-in-luxembourg_6edfa.pdf

This and similar observations caused Spanish scientists to become curious about that actual contents of the vaccinations, since they wanted to understand what was giving rise to the magnetic effects. They obtained more than 100 vials of the vaccine and tested them. They found that 99% was Graphene Oxide (GO).

Spanish lab finds graphene oxide in blood

https://www.henrymakow.com/uplo…/4_5976673186836646447.pdf

https://rumble.com/vjd5sf-98-to-99-of-the-vial-is-graphene-oxide-the-main-component-of-the-vaccine-is.html

https://www.transcend.org/tms/2021/07/graphene-oxide-a-toxic-substance-in-the-vial-of-the-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-w-
video/?fbclid=IwAR3Tgcv9grio4ncfaKMhTYXwP2IsXylrLHZWI5BOIwtK1ZeCVpx_xDH-poc

https://rumble.com/vjfddf-la-quinta-columna-at-the-xxvii…
The Spanish scientists wrote up their report here:
https://web.facebook.com/groups/352273635911627/permalink/544930786645910

South American lab finds graphene oxide in blood:
https://rumble.com/vk7lap-andreas-kalckers-team-confirms-evidence-of-graphene-oxide-
in-vaccines.html?fbclid=IwAR0s30XQf6z8_RzI1m4vmJxLUeDbq-
hLao4bCe3BQ8Il2r_PCc7X9oeLItQ

French lab finds graphene Oxide in blood: 
https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Grapheneblood:2

If it contains so much GO, that is odd. GO is unnecessary for eliciting any immune response. So what is its purpose.

What Effects Does GO have on the Body? “As GO can directly act on the respiratory system, research has mainly focused on GO
induced damage to this system. … Previous studies on the toxic effects of GO have primarily focused on mitochondrial damage, DNA damage, the inflammatory response, apoptosis and oxidative stress” https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/etm.2021.9893
 
Paramagnetic: GO is paramagnetic. Magnets will stick to it. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1712/1712.03570.pdf
mRNA and Lipid nano particles are not paramagnetic.

To know if your tissues have been contaminated with GO, just see if a magnet sticks to the injection site. To know if your blood has been contaminated with GO, see if the magnet sticks to other parts of your body. This indicates that the V is bioavailable, and has entered circulation.

To know if the V has bi-passed the blood-brain barrier, hold a magnet to your forehead. See also https://nanocenter.nankai.edu.cn/dowmload/2009/2009-10.pdf
Please note that paramagnetic substances may be responsive to electro-magnetic fields causing movement and rearrangement of cells so infected. This may result in aberrant effects.
 
Graphene itself has extraordinary mechanical and electronic properties, but no magnetic properties. This can be made up for with the help of the lightest element: hydrogen, which transfers its magnetic moment on coming into contact with graphene.30 Nov 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmPAAo7_xY0
https://www.graphene-info.com/hydrogen-atoms-magnetize-graphene

Not on the Ingredient List

GO is not listed as an ingredient. So if the V contains GO then we might suspect that some batches are deliberately toxic – secrecy suggests intention to harm.

If the V program is a convenient cover for administering poisons, then it is unlikely that every batch will contain GO, since this would be too apparent. The batches would be staggered. In order to remain elusive, a maximum of 5-10% of batches would be toxic at any one time and “top-up” Vs would be necessary twice yearly for about 5 years.

Interview with Karen Kingston : former Pfizer employee : currently analyst for pharmaceutical and medical device industries/ analyst of intellectual property/ scientific writer. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ppCzUKWqhVbZ/

Here is some info I teased out of the interview……..

“GO is 100% in the shots”
“Pfizer EUA filing lists 4 LNPs in the V with CAS numbers
“Moderna provides a material Safety Datasheet for each LNP with CAS numbers.”
“When I Googled MSDS + CAS number (of the LNPs) it came up with SINOPEG as the
manufacturer – a company in China”

“On the Sinopeg website is a tab called ‘Covid19 excipients’

The Sinopeg website explains the nature of GO in an article called-

“CORE-SHELL STRUCTURED POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL FUNCTIONALISED GRAPHENE
OXIDE FOR ENERGY STORAGE POLYMER DIELECTRICS”

As this article title suggests, Sinopeg regard the function of GO as ENERGY STORAGE in the form of CHARGE (dielectric)- this energy being absorbed as electromagnetic radiation (more on this below). It is the main ingredient. It serves as an interface between an organism and the internet of things. “It is normally neutral, but in an EM field will become positively charged.” “Positively charged GO will destroy anything (biological) it comes in contact with”
“In the Moderna and Pfizer patents GO is not listed because it is classified as a “trade secret” and because it is known to be toxic.”

“A company called SHANGHAI NANOTECH filed a patent for using GO in C19 vaccines in August 2020.”  For this patent – see here –
vhttps://web.facebook.com/…/permalink/556233155515673

GO Will Produce Sensitivity to EM Fields “GO is a conductor of electricity”..”It is a great conductor of electricity, and it can host a magnetic field, so it can
literally interact with the internet” “GO is the main ingredient in hydrogel”

If GO is in the vaccine, then vaccinated people should be highly sensitive to electro-magnetic (EM) fields, since EM fields will induce an electrical charge in the GO which will naturally disturb the electrical nerve signals in the human body. Also the movement of ions through-
out the body will be disturbed.
-
So GO is not necessarily a means of controlling the population; rather it lends itself to a blunter use – a general dysregulation of bodily functions inducible with the on/off precision of a switch.
 
Is there a Particular Waveband that GO Absorbs? Every molecule and every chemical has an absorption spectrum – and there are specific
frequencies where it absorbs energy the most. This paper – https://www.tandfonline.com/…/10…/03602559.2018.1542714 shows that GO is currently used to absorb electromagnetic radiation in the 5G wavebands.

There are different graphene nanostructures, and the wavelengths where they absorb the most radiation are between 6 GHz and 18 GHz – in other words- just above 4G but below the high frequency 5G.

See here – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/10…/advs.201801057…

This means that when GO is exposed to radiation of higher frequency than 4G, it will absorb  the energy of that radiation and convert the energy into electricity. This is similar to the photo-electric effect.

Absorption of the energy excites electrons in the GO which then jump to higher energy levels and become free charges. Hence GO becomes positively charged, and the free electrons form a current.
 
A 2 Stage Weapon

Hence, if GO is present in large quantities within the body then this allows the possibility of a 2 stage weapon. When exposed to a strong enough EM field, GO will take on a positive charge.

“When GO is positive, it will destroy anything it comes in contact with.”
• Stage 1: the V
• Stage 2: an EM pulse

So, if GO is in the vaccine, then it should be possible to kill all the vaccinated with an EM pulse. Such a pulse would generate a charge throughout their bodies – throwing everything into disarray.
 
Property and other creatures will remain intact and unaffected – but an EM pulse will instantly kill or incapacitate the vaccinated. An EM pulse will also shut down electronic equipment and crash the internet and telecoms (it could be blamed on a cyber-attack by “the Russians”), so it would also serve as a blackout
- cutting comms.
-
Such an EM pulse would most likely be released at night, so as to avoid alerting others to the synchronicity of multiple deaths. Those afflicted would simply not wake up. A surprising number of simultaneous deaths would be a sign – but how would we know this without comms? The spontaneous failure of electronic equipment – mobile phone, watch, laptop – would be the only clue.
-
Alternatively, if 5G masts are able to put out an intermediate frequency – say 12 GHz – then it’s likely that every vaccinated person within 1 square mile will collapse ( and there will be a mast in every road). Once again, this will most likely occur at night to avoid the appearance of multiple instant deaths.
 
Testing the Hypothesis

The hypothesis that GO renders a person vulnerable to EM fields could be tested – by assessing sensitivity to EM fields amongst vaccinated compared to non-vaccinated. Exposing vaccinated to EM fields of varying frequency.
 
This hypothesis could also be tested by providing EM shielding to vaccinated, to see if it lessens their adverse effects.
 
Those suffering tremors following the vaccine, could test this theory by shielding themselves with EM blocking material. It is possible that their continued spasms are being generated by EM interference owing to the presence of GO.
 
It may also be the case that those suffering severe adverse reactions are dwelling in close proximity to EM transmitters; a correlation may exist.
 
Protect your Equipment

If the nature of the coming cyber-attack is an EMP, then you should protect your electronic equipment by shielding it. Damage will occur otherwise, even if it is switched off.

“It turns out that a very effective EMP protection measure, or shielding, can be made from aluminium foil. Common heavy-duty aluminium foil successfully blocked all nine million watts of RF energy from reaching the radios. The radio needed to be wrapped in three layers, but it worked!”
https://thesurvivalmom.com/protect-your-gear-from-emp/…!

Protect Yourself

If you have taken the vaccine, then you will probably be harmed by EM fields above 4G. The following paper shows the ranges of frequency where graphene nanostructures absorb EM radiation most of all – these ranges are just above 4G and just below 5G – i.e. 6 – 18 GHz
See here – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/10…/advs.201801057…

You could try protecting yourself in the same way that you can protect equipment (as above). As I said, attacks are most likely in the night. So you would create /line a tent with 3 layers of aluminium foil. The vaccinated ones would sleep inside.

However, there will be no escaping the 5G transmitters if they transmit the harmful frequencies throughout the day in every road. Your best protection will be to go to remote areas where 5G is unavailable.
 
Does this Negate the Effects of the Spike? No, the Spike is still toxic – inducing micro-clotting in the majority of vaccinated.
If GO is in the vaccine then GO simply adds the potential to use an EMP to take out all the
vaccinated simultaneously and cleanly.
It is possible that the Govts are waiting until they have got the maximum number of
vaccinated before they “flick the switch”…
-
Combatting the Effects of GO
GO does damage by emitting electrons. Reducing agents such as zinc or acetyl cysteine are
electron acceptor, and consequently “soaks up” the electrons emitted by GO. These
molecules do not break down the GO, but act as protectors from its effects. I have posted a
video by the Spanish lab explaining this.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CV4O2QUzCqIK/?fbclid=IwAR1iUlBwGkNhFjMsiVZQ3g-
OEaqd6H6rL32AEtfZi1N8c1jchUM64Hq3N_E
“GO molecule has the ability to inject electrons depending upon the electro-magnetic
environment”
“As soon as its activated, it starts throwing charges where-ever it goes – and of
course that destroys everything – they break down.”
“You charge the molecules, and if the molecules are saturated with a charge they
shouldn’t, then they’re destroyed – they break down”
“If you get a molecule like zinc, with two positive charges, then it will be neutralised.
After a while, 2 or 3 zinc molecules that pass around the GO molecule will end up
emptying the electrons from the GO”
“People who have problems with the V, are probably people who live near 5G
antennas”

Global Research, Study on Electromagnetism of Vaccinated Persons, Mamer and Amar Goudjil (European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance), July 28, 2021 (first published July 8, 2021). https://www.globalresearch.ca/study-electromagnetism-vaccinated-persons-luxembourg/5749516Study conducted in Luxembourg: In the vaccinated group, 29 of the 30 individuals interviewed showed attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adhered to their skin.

For the past few months, hundreds of amateur videos have been popping up all over social media featuring people who have visibly become electromagnetic following vaccination.

After many questions were raised by a number of our members about this “supposed” electromagnetic effect in vaccinated subjects, our association decided to take a concrete interest in this intriguing subject.

This survey, of a purely statistical and sociological nature, on this supposed electromagnetic effect, which is the subject of this report, raises at least three important questions:

Is it true that people show an electromagnetic effect after vaccination?
If so, is it true that only vaccinated individuals show this effect?
What is actually injected into individuals under the qualification of vaccine that causes this effect?

To try to answer these questions, the survey was entrusted to Mr. Amar GOUDJIL, treasurer of the association and member in charge of demographic and sociological issues.

Presentation of the survey parameters:

For the purpose of a fast-tracked completion, it was decided:

That a panel of 200 individuals living or working in Luxembourg would be interviewed.
That this panel would be divided into 2 groups. The first would be composed of 100 individuals vaccinated in Luxembourg and the second of 100 unvaccinated individuals for comparison purposes.
That each of these groups should have 50 women and 50 men.
That only active individuals would be selected to participate in the study due to the fact that they are much more constrained to vaccination than inactive individuals.
That the location of the study would be the Belle-Étoile shopping centre and the route d’Arlon in Strassen.
That the variables retained would therefore be sex, age, occupation, number of injections, the pharmaceutical origin of the injections, the date of the injections, the magnetic attraction, the emission-reception of an electric field and the town of residence of the respondent.
It should also be noted that for practical reasons, only people wearing short-sleeved or sleeveless clothing would be interviewed.

Presentation of the method of approach and execution:

The interviewer introduces himself/herself to the individuals, presents the association and then introduces the survey.

“Hello Madam or Sir, sorry to bother you but my name is Amar GOUDJIL, I work for the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV) and I am currently carrying out a statistical and anonymous survey on vaccinated and non-vaccinated people living in Luxembourg.” … “It’s a survey about information according to which vaccinated people show electromagnetic effects and at EFVV, we are trying to find out what the observed reality is”.

The interviewer then asks the respondents if they would be willing to participate in the survey on a voluntary basis.

“Would you please spare a few minutes and would you be interested in participating in our survey? “.

The interviewer then explains the interests of the survey to the interviewees and introduces the individuals to the subject by presenting them with a magnet which he sticks, by magnetic effect, to a metallic object (post, car, etc.). He then explained that magnets do not adhere to humans and that they only adhere to metallic objects, but that information had been received claiming that vaccinated people generated an attraction to the magnet because they had been vaccinated.
The interviewer then asks the respondent if he or she is willing to play the game and apply the magnet to the place where he or she was injected.
When the magnet sticks to the skin on the shoulder, the interviewer then asks the respondent to stick the magnet on the other shoulder.
The interviewer then asks the respondent if he or she is willing to have an electric and magnetic field tester (Meterk brand, model MK54) be placed on the shoulders, explaining that information had also been reported to our association that vaccinated people also generate electric fields.
The interviewer continues the discussion and continues to respond, as far as possible, to interviewees who are interested in the conducted experiment and in the results of the survey.

Summary presentation of the results for the study week from 1 June to 5 June 2021:
Graphene Oxide Particles in Covid mRNA “Vaccines” Causing Magnetism?

Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated people were finally interviewed while the target was to interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.
The condition of gender distribution was met. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were interviewed.
In the non-vaccinated group, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people showing attraction to the magnet was 0 (zero). Therefore the experiment ended there for this group.
In the vaccinated group, on the other hand, 29 of the 30 individuals interviewed showed attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adhered to their skin without difficulty.
Of these same 29 individuals, 22 have the magnet adhering to only one shoulder and only to the injection area. These 22 individuals are those who received only one injection. The other 7 people in this same group have the magnet adhering on both shoulders.
In this group, known as the group of vaccinated people living or working in Luxembourg, it appears that:
17 received at least one injection from Pfizer
7 received at least one injection from Astra Zeneca
3 received at least one injection from the Moderna laboratory
3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
6 received both Pfizer injections
1 received the 2 injections from Astra Zeneca
1 received the 2 injections from Moderna
Two of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, showed totally abnormal electric field emissions. In the case of the nurse, a video was even made showing the values emitted by the tester in the area around the left shoulder. For the analyst, the values emitted by the tester were approximately the same, but the individual abruptly ended his participation.
Out of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 reside or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives in Metz but works in Strassen.
It seems that people who were vaccinated earlier within the government vaccination programme are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds better than in freshly vaccinated people.

More precise measurements should be taken in relation to this last finding.

Note: The exercise being totally destabilising for the respondents, at no point were they asked to apply the magnet to any area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know whether the magnet also adhered to the neck, chest, forehead or leg areas and whether other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhered.

Conclusion:

It was found that vaccinated individuals do give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they gave off. This sensation and appraisal, which is purely a tactile experience when the shoulder magnet is applied and removed, should be verified much more accurately with much more precise equipment.

It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play along with this extremely disorienting experiment.

Individuals are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet clings onto their skin, they become dubious at first, then they suddenly become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely shocked.

People sincerely wonder how a magnet can stick to their skin as easily as it sticks to a metal pole.

They ask for an explanation and the investigator reassures them that there must be an explanation. They are referred back to the doctor who advised them to get an injection.

One lady even cried and told me that she did not want to be vaccinated but was forced to because her employer said she had to because she works in contact with customers.

In the conversations, it emerged that people do not even vaccinate for medical or health reasons, out of conviction or fear of the disease but often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.

During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying afterwards that they are taken as hostages. Many acknowledge that this injection is non-consensual and that at no time were they given rational explanations, even if only from the point of view of the benefit-risk balance. After reflection and discussion, they then describe this act as: “mistake, madness, loophole, solution, or even blackmail”.

These exact terms were used frequently.

Here again, a psychosocial investigation should be conducted into the real motivations that led the vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected. Ideally, all conversations with the vaccinated would be recorded and filmed for further analysis.

The survey is stopped for reasons of conscience and morals because the investigator is no longer able to cope with the helplessness of people whose faces become petrified when they realise that they have been injected with a substance of which they know nothing.

The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, is very uncomfortable with these people who are wondering what is happening to them.

People become pale, white, nervous, put a hand to their forehead or cross their arms and pinch their bottom lip. Some sweat from their hands as they are seen wiping them on their hips or thighs.

These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or really measurable tension.

For the respondents, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep malaise when they realise afterwards that they may have done something irreparable.

The act of vaccination being an irreversible act.

To the question, is it true that people present an electromagnetic effect after having undergone at least one act of vaccination, the answer is affirmative and yes, indeed, individuals do become electromagnetic on the injection zone at least.

To the question of what is injected into individuals that causes this effect, we reply that it is up to the governments and authorities responsible for the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question, as they are the ones who took the heavy decision to vaccinate the population.

Here we will not answer for the responsibility of each party, but it is certain that if paramagnetic nanoparticles (nanocarriers or magnetic beads) have entered the composition of these so-called vaccines, it is a safe bet that we will very quickly hear about an unprecedented health disaster.

It is now the responsibility of toxicologists and pharmacologists to discover the origins and causes of these attractive effects on vaccinated subjects, and it is the responsibility of the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country to very quickly demand the opening of an enquiry into the exact and real composiSon of these so-called vaccines.

Reuters Fact Check, No evidence graphene oxide is present in available COVID-19 vaccines via lipid nanoparticles, Staff Report, Aug. 11, 2021. Allegations that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines currently available in the United States (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) are toxic because they contain graphene oxide on their lipid nanoparticles (which help transport the mRNA through the body) are baseless. Link: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines/fact-check-no-evidence-graphene-oxide-is-present-in-available-covid-19-vaccines-via-lipid-nanoparticles-idUSL1N2PI2XH

The claims stem from a July 28 talk show ( archive.ph/eTKvT) where a woman in the video, introduced as Karen Kingston, points to documentation on a lipid particle maker’s website which allegedly shows that graphene oxide is present in their products.

Pfizer and Moderna told Reuters, however, that graphene oxide is not among their vaccines’ ingredients.

The video has since gained over 1.3 million views on Rumble and has been replicated on YouTube (archive.ph/8f6vW ), BitChute ( archive.ph/18Cfp , archive.ph/pfpLo), Brighteon (archive.ph/krx6O) and social media (archive.ph/Uew1Q, archive.ph/e3ZMC).

WHAT IS GRAPHENE OXIDE?

Graphene oxide is a “single-atomic layered material” made through the oxidation of graphite (  here  ). When chemically reduced (  bit.ly/3yAcXpn  ,  here ), graphene oxide can create graphene which has been described as “the strongest, thinnest and most conductive material on earth” (  here ).

Medical experts at Meedan’s Health Desk explain  here   that this compound, which has been studied for multiple biomedical applications including biosensors and drug delivery, could be toxic to humans in certain amounts. But in the case of its use in potential vaccines, current research indicates these would contain such small quantities that it would not be toxic to human cells.

The medical experts said that “many more studies and trials are needed” to determine whether the compound would be completely safe and effective for biomedical applications.

Both manufacturers told Reuters the material is not present in their vaccines, and it is not listed among the publicly shared ingredients of the vaccines.

MANUFACTURERS ASSURE GRAPHENE OXIDE IS NOT IN MRNA VACCINES

“Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine,” Keanna Ghazvini , Pfizer’s Senior Associate of Global Media Relations told Reuters via email. 

Ray Jordan, Moderna’s Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, told Reuters via email: “I can confirm that our products do not contain graphene oxide.”

Reuters previously debunked the overall false claim that COVID-19 vaccines contained graphene oxide  here  . 

This article will address the main claim that graphene oxide is present in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs); other allegations made in the 25-minute clip are beyond the scope of this article.

LIPID NANOPARTICLES

The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are essentially “delivery vehicles” that protect the mRNA when the vaccine is injected and transport it to the right place in the cells ( here ).

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) ( here )is a compound used in both COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to keep the lipid nanoparticles stable, medical experts at Meedan’s Health Desk explain  here   . (This is why the term PEG-LNPs may be used.)

Polyethylene glycol can be found listed as an ingredient among the lipids in the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine ( here , here   ) and the Moderna vaccine ( here , here ).

“PEG has a long history of safe use in FDA-approved drug formulations,” Kathryn Whitehead, Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) (here) told Reuters via email. See more (here).

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not recommend the mRNA vaccines for people with a PEG allergy (here).

STUDY PRESENTED PREDATES PANDEMIC

The woman in the video points to information on the website of Sinopeg, a Chinese company, which is among various companies in the world ( here ) that produce lipid nanoparticles ( here ). 

She shows an entry of Sinopeg’s website in the section “Industry news” (archive.ph/ic1sg). The information, however, is about a different PEG (a polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether, not the PEG-LNPs in the mRNA vaccines) that was “successfully grafted to the surface of graphene.”

Sinopeg referred to a study originally published by the journal Composites Science and Technology ( here ). The publication first received the study on Dec. 2019, predating the detection of COVID-19.

Contacted by Reuters, Sinopeg said that the company has “never provided any lipid nanoparticles that include graphene oxide” and that the grafted graphene mentioned in this study “is not related to COVID-19 vaccines.”

Whitehead concurred.  “Yes, there are a million different types of PEG. No doubt there are some you can purchase that are attached to graphene,” she said. “However, those are totally not the PEG-lipids used in the nanoparticles [in mRNA vaccines].”

Ghazvini told Reuters that “none of our lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are manufactured in China” and said that Sinopeg is not a manufacturer of the LNPs used in their Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. 

Moderna did not immediately respond whether they used Sinopeg LNPs.

Further information about the manufacturers that do produce the lipid nanoparticles in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines can be found here , here , here, here and here.

UNRELATED PATENT

Around timestamp 2:58 of the video, the woman refers to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine patent alongside a Chinese patent application. This can be seen again at timestamp 10:09. This patent, however, is unrelated to Moderna or the Pfizer-BionTech COVID-19 vaccines.

The application in question can be found  here. According to Google patents, the application was filed by the Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology ( www.nercn.com.cn/ ) on Sept. 27, 2020. As of the publishing of this check, the application carries a “pending” status. 

It is for an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate which did indeed include “graphene oxide as a carrier” but had not reached human testing phase.

This potential vaccine is among the 184 immunizations that are still in pre-clinical development, which means it has been tested only on animals ( here ), according to the latest information by the World Health Organization (WHO) here   (see excel document, find “LNP-encapsulated mRNA encoding RBD” by developer “Fudan University/ Shanghai JiaoTong University/RNACure Biopharma” in the pre-clinical tab).

Spanish fact-checker Newtral also addressed this Chinese patent application mix-up,  here, as false claims about toxic levels of graphene oxide in the vaccines have circulated online.

Reuters asked Kingston, who featured in the video, for comment. She encouraged Reuters to ask experts how they could be certain no graphene oxide was in the vaccine but offered no further remarks on the documentation referenced in the interview.

VERDICT

False. Reuters did not find evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide in their lipid nanoparticles. Pfizer and Moderna have said that no graphene oxide is present in their vaccines. A video presents an unrelated patent and an unrelated article from the website of medical manufacturer Sinopeg.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here    .         

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Forbes, Graphene Oxide In Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines? Here Are The Latest Unsupported Claims, Bruce Y. Lee (writer, journalist, professor, systems modeler, computational and digital health expert), July 10, 2021. Now some are claiming that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine contains over 99% graphene oxide. Link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=e335b8374d71

The Covid-19 vaccines are not like those Monday morning surprise dishes at your local restaurant. They aren’t like some of those less regulated dietary supplements that may secretly contain Viagra or steroids either. No, Covid-19 vaccines should not have unexpected ingredients. To make sure people know what they are getting, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has posted an ingredient list for the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine on its website. So, has the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Yet, there are now claims circulating that the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is around 99% graphene oxide. This despite the fact that graphene oxide does not appear on either the FDA or CDC list. For example, an Instagram post included the following statement: “99% Graphene Oxide in Pfizer V4X? Spanish scientists obtain vial of Pfizer v4xin3 and find that 98-99%.” In this case, “V4X” presumably is shorthand for “vaccine” rather than “vagina for your ex.”

As PolitiFact.com, a nonprofit project operated by the Poynter Institute, described, the post indicated that graphene oxide, “is toxic to the human body and causes a number of problems.” A video accompanying the post featured someone named “Dr. Jane Ruby.” Ruby advanced claims that over 99% of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine consists of graphene oxide and that “There’s no other reason for this to be in here except to murder people.”

Forbes, Murder people? The Covid-19 vaccine is being used to murder people? You can’t just slip in the word “murder” without offering more explanation or evidence. Imagine telling someone, “I had a great dinner with you, except for when you tried to murder me” or “my boss is OK, except for the whole murder thing.”

Here’s a Tweet thread that featured the aforementioned Ruby:

MORE FOR YOU
Study Claiming Face Masks Harmful, Increase CO2 For Children Is Retracted

Jane Ruby

From Twitter From Twitter

As you can, @PunchyMr pointed out that Ruby has doctorate in psychology not medicine. That’s even though Ruby lists on her Twitter profile “Medical Expert”:
Jane Ruby Profile

From Twitter From Twitter

The word “medical expert” is not something that you can just throw out there. It’s not like saying that you are an “asparagus petting” expert. If you position yourself as a medical expert, what you say can really affect people’s health. What degrees, training, and experience does Ruby has? Well, Ruby’s website has the following description: “Dr. Jane Ruby is a Washington DC health economist and New Right political pundit with fascinating conservative insights and breaking news in the world of New Media!” Does that sound like a “medical expert”?

The post mentioned Spanish scientists without specifying their qualifications or presenting their data for the scientific community to review. Beware of anyone offering the word “scientists” without much more details on why anyone should believe them. If you had a basketball game that you had to win, would you rely on a stranger telling you that she has assembled a bunch of “players”? There would be no guarantee of how well they could actually play basketball. In fact, it could be just a bunch of people not interested in monogamy, which won’t help you win the basketball game.

Other social media posts have mentioned a “Spanish lab” too:

“Spanish lab” may sound official but is meaningless without more details and clarification. The word “lab” is vague and could refer to a lot of different things, including a dog. A Labrador Retriever in Spain testing vaccines would have very different implications.

These so-called Spanish lab findings have not been published in any respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal. According to Health Feedback, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO)-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), there are claims that this Spanish lab is located at the University of Almería in Almería, Spain, yet this university has “unequivocally distanced itself from the analysis”:

Keep in mind that vaccines are a lot more highly regulated than things like dietary supplements and various foods and beverages. Imagine what would happen if Pfizer were to not include a key ingredient, especially one that comprised 99% of the vaccine, on the ingredient lists submitted to the FDA and CDC. Such an omission could put Pfizer at major legal risk and jeopardize their entire business. The FDA also conducts periodic evaluations of the manufacturing processes involved in producing the vaccines. So slipping in an undeclared ingredient wouldn’t be that easy? Besides, what would be the purpose? Murder?

If there is real concern about what is going into any products in general, it may be best to strengthen the FDA. Rather than speculating wildly about what may be in products, how about pushing for more funding for the FDA and further extending it’s oversight over a broader range of products? Wouldn’t this make sense for those making anti-vaccination claims? Unless, of course, they are trying to get you to use dietary supplements instead of getting vaccinated.

Health Desk, How do we know graphene oxide isn’t used in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines? Staff Report, Aug. 4, 2021. The Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not contain any graphene oxide. The ingredient list for both vaccines have been published and tested by outside parties. They were not found to contain any graphene oxide in their formulas, including their lipid nanoparticles. Link: https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines

Lipid nanoparticles, basically tiny balls of fat, are used in mRNA vaccines to protect delicate RNA molecules so the vaccine can enter the human body without being destroyed. Lipid nanoparticles have been recognized as potential drug delivery systems (ways to get medications into human cells, especially injectable drugs) since the 1960s. Lipids are fatty, oily, or waxy and include fats and oils (triglycerides), waxes, and steroids, among other things.

Sometimes a compound called polyethylene glycol (PEG) can be used to help keep lipid nanoparticles stable, as they are used in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. However, there is no graphene oxide in the PEG-lipid nanoparticles

No WHO authorized vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinovac, Sputnik V, or Janssen contain graphene oxide. The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine has not yet published a list of its ingredients in a peer-reviewed or open access publication.

Graphene oxide is a compound that contains carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen. It is used in many applications, from sensors to textiles to the potential application of medicine. This material is cheap, readily available, and can disperse in water. It is water soluble, so it may be a great solution for helping medications be absorbed. It can be produced as a powder or a solution for various uses.

Graphene oxide may be a useful tool in vaccine delivery in the future, because scientists and chemical engineers believe it can be engineered to be a safe delivery vehicle for vaccines, and help increase their effectiveness. Like lipid nanoparticles, graphene oxide is also a nanoparticle and has recently been used in an intranasal influenza vaccine platform with promising results.

Additionally, these nanoparticles have been shown to increase macrophages and T cells, which can boost our immune systems and generate potentially stronger immune responses. Recent studies have shown that graphene and graphene-related materials may have antiviral and antimicrobial properties, so evaluating them for use in medication and vaccine design is warranted.

While certain amounts of graphene oxide could be toxic to humans, current research on the use of this compound in other vaccines indicate that the amount that would be in potential vaccines would be so small that it would not be toxic to human cells. A 2016 study showed that graphene-base materials (like graphene oxide) might cause dose-dependent toxicity, decreased cell viability, formations of lung granuloma, and cell apoptosis. Notably, these studies were performed on mice, but graphene oxide specifically showed no obvious toxicity at low doses or middle doses from .1 to .25 mg. It was chronically toxic at higher doses of .4 mg, where it was found to deposit in the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. It is important to note that this .4 mg of graphene oxide is proportionally much greater in mice than it would be in humans, considering their size and biological differences. Further, this study was completed 10 years ago and the graphene oxide was not chemically engineered in a manner that may make it safer or more tolerable for living organisms.

Many more studies and trials are needed to determine whether or not graphene oxide is an effective, completely safe, and useful material for biomedical applications including drug delivery, imaging, and biosensors. Current research on the compound has produced mixed results but optimism have been increased due to the success of recent research projects as of late.

Context and background

Viral videos, posts, and articles have been falsely written about the role of graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines, despite any actual evidence to support these findings. The ingredients of COVID-19 vaccines have been published and evaluated by independent groups, outside of Novavax, and found no graphene oxide in any part of their formulas.

Graphene oxide is currently being investigated to determine whether or not it can be a safe and effective tool for use in vaccines among other biomedical properties.

Resources

Fact sheet for recipients and caregivers: Emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus disease 2019

(COVID-19) in individuals 18 years of age and older (United States Food and Drug Administration)

Fact sheet for recipients and caregivers: Emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in individuals 12 years of age and older (United States Food and Drug Administration)
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID ‘Vaccine’ (Rumble)
Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier (Google Patents)
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide (Reuters)
COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape (World Health Organization)
Nanomedicine: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to COVID-19 (Frontiers in Medicine)
Are COVID-19 Vaccines Mostly Graphene Oxide? Here’s What Experts Have to Say (The Science Times)
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms (Particle and Fibre Toxicity)
Biocompatibility of Graphene Oxide (Nanoscale Research Letters)
Antiviral performance of graphene-based materials with emphasis on COVID-19: A review (Medicine in Drug Discovery)
Graphene Oxide In Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines? Here Are The Latest Unsupported Claims (Forbes)
Comprehensive Review on Graphene Oxide for Use in Drug Delivery System (Current Medicinal Chemistry)
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Pharmacological and Biopharmaceutical Aspects (Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences)
Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 (Chemical & Engineering News)
Understanding the nanotechnology in COVID-19 vaccines (CAS: American Chemical Society)
Biochemistry, Lipids (StatPearls)
PEG shedding-rate-dependent blood clearance of PEGylated lipid nanoparticles in mice: Faster PEG shedding attenuates anti-PEG IgM production (International Journal of Pharmaceutics)
COVID-19 Vaccines for People with Allergies (United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Drug and Gene Delivery Technologies (Biomaterials Nanoarchitectonics)
Biomimetics: Research explores the potential of graphene oxide (Binghampton University)
What is graphene oxide? (Biolin Scientific)
Graphene Oxide (Jiaxing Huang Group)
Graphene Oxide (GO) Market 2021: Application Coverage by Different Demand Market by Region, Main Consumer Profile, Market Size & Forecast 2024 (MarketWatch)
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant (Acta Biomateriala)
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity† (Nanoscale)
Potential of graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19: properties, perspectives, and prospects (Materials Today Chemistry)
Graphene and the Immune System: A Romance of Many Dimensions (Frontiers in Immunology)
Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
Dispersibility-Dependent Biodegradation of Graphene Oxide by Myeloperoxidase (Nano Micro Small)
In vivo biodistribution and toxicology of functionalized nano-graphene oxide in mice after oral and intraperitoneal administration (Biomaterials)
Graphene Hydrogel Could Help mRNA Vaccine Target Cancer More Effectively (Clinicalomics)
Ultrasmall Graphene Oxide Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Adjuvants Improve Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Mice (Advanced Functional Materials)
Exploration of graphene oxide as an intelligent platform for cancer vaccines† (Nanoscale)

Karen Kingston
President & Founder at Varitage
Carlsbad, California, United States500+ connections

https://www.linkedin.com/in/karenkingstonkk

Karen Kingston is a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst. She has over 20 years of experience in business development, marketing, sales, public speaking, and strategic consulting. As an executive strategist, her clients range from start-ups to Fortune 500 leaders, including Allergan, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. She has developed key messaging, business plans, pricing strategies, global campaigns, go-to-market strategies, and other core marketing assets for inline products and blockbuster launches.

She began her career as a top performing Pfizer sales representative in NYC and was quickly recruited to the marketing side of the business. She played an integral role in the re-launch of VIAGRA shifting the focus to younger men and empowering patients to speak to their doctors about Viagra. She has led sales training, marketing and communication workshops and has appeared on FOX, MSNBC, and CBS as the spokeswoman and Director of US Marketing for InnoVision Labs.

In 2007, Karen founded Varitage. She specializes in improving lead generation, nurturing, and conversion for B2B and B2C customers. Karen works closely with her clients and team to provide actionable insights to make real-time, well-informed strategic decisions that result in significant improvements across critical marketing KPI’s.

Raw Story, Anti-vaxx lawyer for dozens of Capitol rioters is now on a ‘ventilator’ with COVID-19: report, John Wright, Aug. 25, 2021. Attorney John Pierce, who has represented Kenosha, Wisconsin, shooting suspect Kyle Rittenhouse, right, as well as more than a dozen Capitol rioters, reportedly is on a ventilator after contracting COVID-19.

Pierce’s illness was first reported Wednesday after it prompted a hearing for accused Capitol rioter Shane Jenkins to be delayed, according to independent journalist Marcy Wheeler and Washington Post reporter Rachel Weiner.

“Pierce is not AT this hearing, he sent the lawyer from his office who is not barred in DC again,” Wheeler reported.

“Mr. Pierce is in the hospital, we believe, with COVID-19, on a ventilator, non-responsive,” one of the attorneys who was present reportedly told a judge.

The judge ultimately continued the hearing until next week, saying, “Send our best wishes to Mr. Pierce and his family.”

Last week, the Daily Beast reported that Pierce recently reinvented himself as “a go-to lawyer for conservative causes célèbres.”

“But even as his star rises on the right, Pierce has been undermined by a bizarre tweet appearing to threaten federal officials, an employee facing felony charges for allegedly defrauding a grandmother, and his own financial woes,” the Daily Beast reported.

Jenkins, the Capitol rioter, was recently denied release after a judge determined he represents a danger to the community and a flight risk. He allegedly destroyed property while trying to break into the Capitol, and threw a flagpole and desk drawer at police.

On his Twitter account, Pierce posted several messages stating his opposition to vaccines and mask mandates:

Source: https://www.justice-integrity.org/1867-new-covid-claims