The Rising Migration Crisis in Europe – the Great Replacement

Ne’re the twain shall meet

by Mustang

Migrating Europeans, one thing stands out: they had tremendous courage to tear themselves away from everything they ever knew and head toward a land of uncertainty.  A Texan might say of these people, “They had sand.”  And they, in time (and rather quickly, I suppose), became Americans.

Europeans without sand — or those without reason to migrate, stayed where they were.  Their descendants are today’s Europeans.  Another transition is going on as I write this: Europeans are being emigrated and bred out of existence by their replacement populations: people from the Middle East and Africa, most of whom are Islamists.

According to one prediction, only half of France will consist of ethnic Frenchmen thirty years from now.  Every minority group in Europe has signed on to “wokeism” because it guarantees they’ll get their way.  According to these migrants, there are two problems in Europe: white people and Jews.  They didn’t have those problems in their natural homeland, so one must wonder why they migrated.  Because this is the strategy of Moslems in Saudi Arabia: supplant white Christians and Jews with non-white Moslems.  It’s simple enough to note, but no one in the European press is covering it.

The significance of this, by the way, is that Germans should expect a substantial increase in the population of ethnic Turkish, Bosnian, Kosovar, Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian, a concomitant rise in ethnic politicians and voters, and a guarantee (some say) that within another thirty years, ethnic Germans will have nothing to say about how their country is governed.

Between 65 – 70% of people living in Frankfort will be non-German Moslems.  Source: Herbert Brucker, Federal Institute for Employment Research (2019).  According to Florence Bergeaud-Blackler, a German anthropologist, the Moslem Brotherhood strategy from the 1980s — to form alliances with the most docile German political parties to propagate their ideas is working quite well.

Alain Chouet, the former deputy director of the French counter-intelligence service, Direction Générale De La Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE), recently published a book titled Sept pas vers l’enfer (Seven Steps to Hell), within which he claims, “I have been invited every year to give a lecture on the problems of the Arab world in Molenbeek (a suburb of Brussels).

One day I was there when Philippe Moureaux, the city’s socialist mayor and big boss of the Belgian Socialist Party, took the front row flanked by two imposing bodyguards in djellabas, beards, and white berets.  To the audience, Moureaux said I was not qualified to discuss the Arab world, as I came from a country that had tortured Muslims in Algeria.

His reasoning is significant in the way in which, since the late 1980s, the European left has allowed itself to be taken over by the sirens of militant Salafism.  The management of Molenbeek is exemplary in this sense: authorizations granted easily and without any control for the opening and functioning of mosques, Islamic private schools, cultural and sports clubs — all generously subsidized by Saudi Arabia”.

It may be interesting for the reader to note that 25 out of 89 members of the Brussels Regional Parliament are Islamists.

Monsieur Chouet continues, “I accuse political leaders of never wanting to understand the rise of radical Islam and of deliberately ignoring it because of the electorate and ‘politically correctness  .’I accuse them of allowing several municipalities to develop jihadist radicalism over many years, to the point that a socialist official told me: ‘We know Molenbeek’s problem, but what do you want?  It is an electorate that cannot be neglected.’”

The Europeans who remained behind during the diaspora to America now face depopulation of a different kind — and they sit back and do nothing.  Indeed, one must ask, after 40 years of social unraveling, what could any European government do about this now without substantial condemnation in the European (suicidal) press or wide-scale civil unrest?

Algerian writer Kamel Daoud challenges the French by asking, “Is the Muslim vote decisive?”  Absolutely — and no Frenchman seems interested in taking his country back.  The invasion began in 732 A.D. and is now nearly complete.

Who is leading this charge?  French President Emmanuel Macron, of course — assisted by radical left (pro-immigration) Jean-Luc Mélenchon, of “La France Insoumise” (Rebellious France), who made dramatic progress since 2017, receiving 22% of the vote only one point behind conservative Marine Le Pen.  Who does he thank for such success?  The 69% of Moslems who voted for him.

In an interview on French television Europe 1, philosopher Alain Finkielkraut claims that Mélenchon is betting on the so-called “Great Replacement” to gain more political power.  He caters to Africans, Moslems, and Asians.  In another age, Mélenchon would be shot for treason.  France’s suburbs and large cities with a high rate of immigration have been the heart of Mélenchon’s political project because these foreigners allow him to maintain 60% of the votes in French elections.

Given what we now know about the depopulation of Europeans by Islamists, it is undoubtedly too late to save France, Germany, Belgium, or any other European country.  The Saudi plan has worked out quite well — but not without the full help of French, Belgian, and German politicians themselves.

The implications of the preceding for the United States aren’t much better.  Maybe that Imperialism schtick isn’t working out very well for anyone — anyone, that is, except for the Moslems.  This, of course, is enough to make a thoughtful person wonder if the Europeans deserve any better.  But no one in America should laugh.  We’re next.

Mustang also blogs at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar