Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Revelations Of Princess Diana Murder May Have Been Cause By Her Knowledge Of VIP Pedophile Ring

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.




The Mysterious Deaths of Princess Diana, Jill Dando, SAS, British Intelligence, CIA Snoopers, William Hague and the VIP child-abuse connection

According to media reports, the Metropolitan Police are assessing sensational new information, passed to them from unnamed sources, that the British Military may have been involved in the death of Princess Diana.

” The Sunday People reports that UK police are investigating the claim that Princess Diana was murdered by the SAS, the UK military’s special forces regiment.

“The allegation emerged at the second court martial of Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegally possessing a gun and ammunition.”

Various theories have emerged over the past 16 years which have cast doubts over the official story that Diana was killed in a crash after a Paparazzi car chase; the most popular being that she was murdered due to her relationship with Dodi Al-Fayed.

Could a more likely theory be that Diana had knowledge of the powerful VIP paedophile ring linked to the UK Government, the BBC and the Royal Family that has been operating in the UK for over 50 years and was about to blow the lid on what she knew?

Could the death of Diana also be linked to the brutal murder of Jill Dando, who was shot in the head at point-blank range less than 18 months later?

We now know that Jill was herself investigating a paedophile ring at the BBC.

Were they sharing explosive evidence that could bring down the British Establishment?

Jill’s fiancé, Alan Farthing, came face-to-face with her killer but forgot to tell the police.

“ Alan has since risen through the ranks of the medical profession and is now the doctor responsible for the birth of Kate and William’s new baby.

Was his promotion linked to Jill’s murder?”

Cliff Richard was a close friend of both Diana and Jill but as we now know, Cliff is really nothing like his wholesome Christian persona.

Cliff has himself been named as a visitor to the notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House, where vulnerable children were trafficked from local care homes to be abused by filthy VIPs.

We know the Met Police interviewed SAS officers following the shooting in Fulham:

” Among the many theories of who gunned down former Crimewatch presenter Jill was one that she was executed by a hitman on behalf of someone else.

Aspects of the murder suggested the killer had professional training.

He had been able to force her to the ground, shoot her with the minimum of noise by pressing the gun barrel to her temple and leave the Fulham street she lived in unnoticed.

Former SAS members were interviewed about an ex-colleague rumoured to be linked to Jill”.

In 1998, the Mirror reported that Diana’s phone was bugged by the CIA:

” AMERICA’S spy chiefs admitted last night they snooped on Princess Diana - and learned some of her most intimate love secrets.

They picked up much of their information by eavesdropping on private telephone conversations between the princess and her trusted friend Lucia Flecha,wife of Brazil’s ambassador in Washington DC.

In the calls, it is said, Diana poured out her heart about her romances with Pakistani doctor Hasnat Khan, playboy Dodi Fayed and others.

The US Central Intelligence Agency is believed to have passed reports on Diana to her enemies in British intelligence.

But all three American spy organisations – the CIA , National Security Agency, and Defence Intelligence – are thought to have tracked the princess on her frequent visits to the US and sometimes elsewhere.

They are claimed to have monitored virtually every aspect of her troubled life – even phone calls about her plans for sons William and Harry.

The NSA confirmed yesterday there was a l,056-page dossier of information on the princess. But they refused to release the dossier, claiming it is still classified as top-secret more than a year after the car crash death of Diana and Dodi.

A spokesman at NSA headquarters in Maryland said: “Making the documents public could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.”   But sources say the top-secret classification was made simply to keep the lid on the way the spies gathered the information.

They add that the NSA was aided in the operation by the CIA and the Defence Intelligence agency which is run from the Pentagon military HQ. The existence of the dossier was disclosed by a US news agency seeking the release of the files under the Freedom of Information Act.”

The NSA was at the centre of a recent controversy relating to the PRISM eavesdropping scandal.

William Hague defended PRISM and told Britain:

” If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear “.

Hague himself has been accused of allowing the North Wales care home abuse enquiry to be a total whitewash and has many skeletons in his own cupboard.

Was Hague aware that Diana was under CIA surveillance?

Does he have important information for the police investigations?

In a compelling article by the ‘Government Community’ the following claims were made about Diana’s injuries following the crash:

”  The injury that killed Princess Diana although critical was not fatal and in fact former President Ronald Reagan survived a similar injury when he was shot by John Hinckley in 1981! Surely if a 70-year-old man could have survived such an injury why not a 36-year-old woman in good health?

The French doctors who were part of the team that tried to resuscitate Princess Diana at the hospital following the crash cited a tear in the left pulmonary vein as the source of internal bleeding that ultimately led to her death…there was no mention of other specific lesions!

Their conclusion was in stark contrast to the remarks made by the French Minister of Health and other officials (and widely embraced by the public, the media, and disseminated by the official report) that Princess Diana died as a result of massive multiple internal injuries that left her no chance to survive!

The simple truth is, it is very highly likely that if Princess Diana had been rushed to a hospital immediately instead of being snail-paced for two hours in an ambulance she will still be alive today! Several eminent doctors from around the globe (including French physicians) agreed that a timely evacuation to the hospital would have probably saved the Princess!

This tends to corroborate my theory postulating the real reason why the ambulance journey took so long; the plotters were waiting for Princess Diana to bleed out before presenting her to other personnel not privy or involved in the plot (waiting hospital staff).”

We do hope that the Met Police are doing everything within their power to finally solve the mysterious deaths of Princess Diana and Jill Dando.

After all, why the hell wouldn’t they?’s+love+secret%3B+Phone+snoop+exposed.-a060622600…-a01073979144



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Immusist Beverage Concentrate - Proprietary blend, formulated to reduce inflammation while hydrating and oxygenating the cells.

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 24 comments
    • caroline

      Are you kidding me ?
      Corruption at Scotland Yard shows that Lord John Stevens, Lord Paul Condon and Sir David Veness colluded and lied repeatedly during their extensive inquest cross-examinations. Stevens presided over one of the largest sham investigations in the history of British policing, Operation Paget. An operation that the public believed was designed to investigate the Paris crash was instead used to cover up the truth of what occurred protecting the perpetrators of the assassination of Princess Diana.

    • caroline

      The most popular Princess in the world murdered by her own Government - Her Majesty´s Government.
      Scotland Yard would create a perception that her death was being fully investigated, when actually what happened was the biggest cover up, the British police had been involved in. Condon, Stevens and Veness deliberatly suppressed the Mischon Note, because they were an integral part of the orchestrated cover up following the assassination of Princess Diana.
      Diana´s lawyer, Victor Mishcon, delivers to Metropolitan Police Service Commisioner, Paul Condon, 1995 notes, revealing that Diana predicted her death by a staged car crash, Condon locks them in his safe for SIX YEARS. The head of the Metropolitan Police lock the Mischom note in his safe for……..SIX YEARS ??!!

    • caroline

      Making an operation deniable is always a consideration within MI6, this indicates that deniability is part of the planning process, this appears to point to choice of method used in carrying out an operation choosing a method that is deniable. In the case of Diana, the decision to eliminate her in a car crash is extremely deniable . an orchestrated car crash is difficult to carry out – but it is very deniable. Deniability is a part of MI6´s technique as lack of accountability.

      The CIA assassination Manual from 1950: ” For Secret assassination….the contrived accident is the most effective technique. When successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated”.
      The SAMU ambulance team who were the people expected to assist in saving Princess Diana, actually ensured that the assassination was successfully executed.
      MI6, DGSE, DST, and CIA are very much in the assassination business.

      In the 1950s, inside the MI6 registry was a copy of a CIA manual written by Dr.Sidney Gottlieb, the director of the agency´s Technical Services Division. Its 88 pages were titled “Assassination Methods”,and it was the first handbook for the state-sponsored murder. It included a warning:”Decisions and instructions should be confined to an absolute minimum of persons and ideally only one person will be involved, whose death provides positive advantages”. But MI6 would never consider assassination.

      I am 100% confident of MI6 involvement in the assassination of Princess Diana.
      British Intelligence, MI6, MI5, SAS, have been involved in a long list of assassination plots bewteen 1942 – 1997. MI6 was directly involved in two high level assassination plots – Saddam Hussein and Muoammar Gaddifi in the 18 months leading up to the Paris crash. There was a concerted interest at the Inquest to shut down any discussion on MI6 involvement in Landmines

    • caroline

      On september 17, 1997, just 17 days after the death of Princess Diana, the treaty was agreed by 90 nations in Oslo, Norway – but the US was not one of them. Instead President Bill Clinton said: ” There is a line I simply cannot cross”. Why was Clinton apparently willing to sign the treaty while Diana was alive, but not willing to, just 2 weeks after she had died ?
      Diana´s anti-landmine campaign appears to be a very real motive for the US CIA to have become involved in her assassination.

    • caroline

      One of MI6´s strategies is to delay treatment. Mi6 had complete control of the medical treatment of Princess Diana right from 12:25 a.m. when Dr. Mailliez arrived in the Alma Tunnel, until 2:08 – when Dr. Martino delivered her to Hospital.
      Dr. Martino and Derossi deliberately lingered as long as they could in the Alma tunnel while they simultaniously pumped catecholamines into Diana knowning it was harmful to her thoracic trauma which they witheld knowledge of to the SAMU base.

      To this day, Princess Diana´s blood has never been DNA tested. La Pitie Salpretiere has always denied taking a blood test on Princess Diana, even though it is regular procedure in any hospital to do so. Records of samples were also omitted by the Lecomte and Mulés autopsy reports. Why ? Because this removes the evidence of discovery of pregnancy and poisoning in the ambulance which is my contention. There was to be no chance of embaressment or scandal. The blood at the Inquest is not Diana´s.

    • caroline

      No, person, group or organisation is going to put their hand up for the assassination of the “People´s Princess”.This is not like a terrorist bombing plot where some organisation is keen to claim responsibility. No one wants to be held responsible for the death of one of the most popular and loved persons of the 20th century – Diana, Princess of Wales
      Yet someone murdered Diana. Someone was involved in orchestrating it. Someone did order this. The Monarchy,Government, Establishment and MI6

      MI6 obfuscate, lie, hold back information, refuse to release it until they are absolutely forced to years and decades down the road. They are their own worst enemies in providing information to the public. They create the groundwork for conspiracy theories because they refuse to extradite the information necessary for the public to reach an informed verdict. Their self-admitted concept of deniability, denying they are responsible for events they are responsible for indicates that MI6 are lying.

      Making an operation deniable is always a consideration to MI6, this indicates that deniability is part of the planning process, this appears to point to choice of method used in carrying out an operation choosing a method that is deniable. In the case of Diana, the decision to eliminate her in a car crash is extremely deniable . an orchestrated car crash is difficult to carry out – but it is very deniable. Deniability is a part of MI6´s technique. You cant prosecute MI6.

    • caroline

      MI6 claims that assassinations are something they do not countenance and at the same time, Mr. Fishwick MI6, makes this statement to Mr. Mansfield (Al.Fayed ) at the Inquest 26.2.08:189.4: “I was worried about Milosevic taken power in Serbia and Yugoslavia so we ought to think about having a contingency plan to assassinated this guy”.
      But its against the ethos of the service to assassinate people. Yes, the MI6 has never assassinated anyone.

    • caroline

      “With this type of injury, time is of the essence……In the United States the delay in getting Princess Diana to the hospital for nearly two hours, would constitute gross malpractice. There is no excuse for it”
      - Dr. Michael Baden, Chief Forensic Pathologist for New York State Police.
      Bring this case to the International Court of Justice with the power to summon witnesses from the UK, US and France. It is impossible to achieve justice under UK, US or French jurisdiction.

      There would be a simple why of checking whether or not the Secret Intelligence Service did advance proposals for assassinations,( Gaddafi, Saddam) but the corrupt Jugde Baker, quickly tried to close this line of questioning down, “This is not an issue in these inquests”. Given that MI6 were prime suspects in the Paris crash, the evidence regading all three plots ( Milosevic ) should have been dealt with in front of the Jury. Baker chose not to address the evidence relating to Saddam and Gaddafi. And the reason is this:
      The Milosevic plot ( 1992 ) was a single proposal document which appeared to get no futher than that and according to MI6 it was destroyed. When the three plots are compared it becomes obvious that the stronger and clearest case indicating MI6 ivolvement in an advanced assassination plot is 1996 Gaddafi and then the Saddam plot – not so much the Milosevic plot ( proposal document raised and conflicting evidence ) similarities in methodology to the Paris crash.
      This indicates that the Milosevic plot should have been adressed at the Inquest ( a crash in a tunnel using a strobe light, same methodology) but certainly not at the exclusion of either Gaddafi or Saddam plots. This is not to say there is no eviednce of MI6 involvement in an assassination of Milosovic – its just that the plot was not advanced and the available evidence is not as strong or clear as the Gaddafi (Final execution) and Saddam(Advanced Jordan base) plots. Bakers motives are evident.
      And why wouldnt the evidence regarding the Gaddafi and Saddam plots be looked at, if we are interested in determining the MI6 approach towards assassinations ? MI6 claim, that they would never contemplate such an action or operation. In this situation, circumstantial evidence becomes very significant – as does the answer to the question: Is there any evidence to link MI6 to other assassinations in a similar time frame to the Paris crash ? Saddam and Gaddafi plots both 1996.
      The point is that evidence indicating MI6 could have been involved in assassination attempts in the year prior to the Paris crash was of critical imporatnce to this inquest. If Baker had been serious about finding out if MI6 had a role in the assassination of Princess Diana,he should have made it his buisness to establish whether the claims were credible. Cross-examination of
      MI6 and MI5 officers could have helped in this. It never happend.

    • caroline

      Dr. Martino knows from the beginning of Princess Diana´s thoracic trauma, so the application of
      catecholamines could be detrimental to Diana´s condition. And Dr. Martino – being a doctor – would have definitely been aware of this. At the Inquest Tom Treasure criticised dr. Martinos actions. Diana had a critical torn vein and the thoracic trauma that such a internal injury was probable. By pouring in Catecholamines Martino was ensuring that any internal injury would be made worse.
      Dr. Martino, failed to inform the base of his initial assessment that Diana had facial injury and could be expected to have “internal injuries, abdominal or thoracic”. Instead he lied to Lejay at the SAMU base. He mentioned an injured arm but omitted potentially life-threatning internal injuries. Dr. Derossi told Lejay two critical lies. He said Diana had “obvious cranial trauma” and then he stated twice “nothing for the thorax”. This is not on the record of Martino´s examination.
      The requirement for hospitalization immediately was admitted by Dr. Martino in his early assessment to the French investigators. Martino told the inquest that a blood pressure of 70 and a pulse of 100 was stable. Yet, he failed to move the ambulance out of the tunnel for 90 minutes. ?? The ambulance travelled at an average speed of 17 kph ( 11 mph ) then stopped within 500 meters of the hospital and arrived at La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital. 01:46 minitues after the crash in the Alma tunnel.
      Dr. Derossi and Dr. Martino lied to the Inquest as for the stoppage of the ambulance. Princess Diana hadn´t arrested, yet witnesses saw the ambulance rocking form side to side.

    • caroline

      Then despite Diana´s blood pressure which is stable, he uses the “LOW BLOOD PRESSURE”, as a pretext to start pumping catecholamines into Diana´s system – the effect of catecholamines is that it increases the blood pressure but it also increases the pressure of any potential internal injury. It should only be administered if absolutely necessary. It was not necessay because Diana´s blood pressure was not low.
      Then he did something completely incomprehensible. I am a physician and this is not correct procedure. Dr. Martino had administered Fentanyl, which is over 80 times more powerful than morphine.
      Now when Dr. Martino was questioned at the inquest about this he said that Diana´s blood pressure was 70 – he then said that between 60 and 80 unites of arterial blood pressure is stabile for a crash victim. So why did it take Dr. Martino 90 minutes to place Princess Diana in the ambulance ??!!

    • caroline

      Both Dr. Mailliez, Dr. Martino and Dr. Derossi, committed perjury at the Inquest and have never been held accountable. By the time Martino had placed Diana in the ambulance after 90 minutes, he anaesthetised, intubated and ventilated her, which is an exstreme process and unnessary for the circumstances, because Diana had a Glasgow Rating of 14 out of 15 and not having trouble breathing. She was conscious!!!

      DR. JEAN-MARC MARTINO AND DR. DEROSSI are the culprits. Diana clealy did not receive the medical treatment one would expect for an average citizen.The questions surrounding her treatment right from Dr. Mailliez early entrance with little equipment and questionable testimony to the failure of Sapeurs Pompiers to provide any practical assistance to the huge delay by SAMU to finally getting Diana to hospital with no cardiologist or knowledge of her bloodtype, is not coincidental but premeditated.

      Dr. Mailliez lied to the Inquest when he said Diana was unconscious, the next day he retracted that statement and said she was conscious. He also told the Inquest he didnt know it was Princess Diana.

      “I told Dr. Mailliez that one of the casualties was the Princess of Wales. He replied that she was a casualty like any other” – Abdelatif Redjil, Pedestrian Eye-Witness, French Investigation Statement, 16 june 1998.
      Dr. Mailleiz lies are multiple and verifiable.

    • caroline

      This was no accident but a sophisticated, premeditated murder not a combined aggravated, pre-ordered harassment by the paparazzi and others…… was NOT manslaughter but a premeditated murder conspiracy by a sophisticated vehicular homicide attack orederd by The House of Windsor.
      Paparazzi had nothing to do with it. The men on motorbikes were masquerading as paparazzi with the purpose of harming the occupants of the Mercedes, but hoping that blame would later be attributed to the paparazzi.
      Princess Diana had upset the Queen, leaders , presidents, prime ministers, arms manufactures and dealers. Then, the Monarchy killed her. The Queen reinstated dead Diana as a Royal so she could control her dead body, the post mortem and the samples taken and the later inquest. Within 25 hours, Diana had gone through two illegal post mortems and two illegal embalmings

    • caroline

      It took two hours to get Diana to hospital and these issues aroused suspicions for Professor Riou, who had 12 years experience as a doctor. Minutes after Diana had officially died he completed her death certificate and ticked “YES” for suspicious death and then about 4:30 he faxed that form off to the Public Prosecutor´s Office.

      Dr. Martino waited 90 minutes before placing Diana in the ambulance. No physician, not even a french SAMU, not if the physician comes from the Moon, waits 90 minutes ??

      Drs Martino and Derossi effectively assassinated Princess Diana in the back of the ambulance, on the orders of their MI6 handlers
      Professor Bruno Riou, the senior doctor on duty of La Pitie Hospital, had suspicions of the actions of the ambulance doctors. 8 minutes before her arrival, he learned it was Princess Diana ?! Riou took X-rays of Diana´s chest and pelvic area.These revealed the impact of the thoracic trauma and he called for the Cardio-thoracic specialist since there was non present!! ?? Are you jkidding me ?

      Dr. Mailliz later said: I was just expecting a brain damage or a chest damage because of the high energy accident”. Dr. Martino also made an early assessment: “Because of what happened at the scene that is to say a high speed accident, the technical wherewithal capable of operating in thoracic, cardiac and abdominal regions were needed”.
      SO WHY DID IT TAKE DR. MARTINO 90 MINUTES TO PLACE DIANA IN THE AMBULANCE ? It was evident from the beginning that Diana needed hospitalization!!

    • caroline

      The most consistent factor of Dr. Mailliezs account over the years has been how inconsistent they are.
      It is no coincidence that dr. Mailliez an emergency doctor was actually passing through the Alma Tunnel at just that time, in a medical emergency car with a flashing light, but with no medical kit. He told the inquest that he worked for the SAMU, later that day he retracted that statement and said under oath, ” I did not work for Samu”. He said that the car was his own vehicle,” my own car” . Then he said that the car belonged to SOS Medicin.

      A normal embalming takes three hours, Princess Diana´s embalming took one hour.
      Princess Diana´s blood had largely been replaced as a result of emergency treatment in the hospital and subsequent illegal embalming. A test of the urine would have been the only reliable remaining way to establish pregnancy or poisoning test. The complete removal of the urine achieved this. Hugette Amarger drained the urine out of Princess Diana´s bladder. No urine at all was left by the time of the illegal UK autopsy.
      To this day, Princess Diana´s blood has never been DNA tested. La Pitie Salpretiere has always denied taking a blood test on Princess Diana, even though it is regular procedure in any hospital to do so. Records of samples were also omitted by the Lecomte and Mulés autopsy reports. Why ? Because this removes the evidence of discovery of pregnancy and poisoning in the ambulance which is my contention. There was to be no chance of embaressment or scandal. The blood at the Inquest is not Diana´s.

    • caroline

      Princess Diana survived the 12.23 a.m. crash in Paris – witness and photographic evidence clearly showed she was alive, conscious and talking in the back of the Mercedes. Yet just after 4 a.m. Diana was pronounced dead. What occurred in the intervening 3½ hours that brought on her premature death ?

      Diana was murdered in the ambulance by Drs Martino and Derossi who committed perjury at the Inquest.

      ” Given that Princess Diana was still alive after nearly two hours, if they´d gotten her to the hospital in an hour, they might have saved her”.
      - Dr. John Ochsner, US Cardio-Vasucular Surgeon.

      “You could never diagnose that kind of injury in the field, never….Spending all that time on-site treatment ( 90 minutes ) was absolutely the wrong approach for this patient”.
      - Dr. David Wasserman. US Emergency Room Doctor.

      Princess Diana was not even given the treatment of an averarge citizen.

      “With this type of injury, time is of the essence……In the United States the delay in getting Princess Diana to the hospital for nearly two hours, would constitute gross malpractice. There is no excuse for it”
      - Dr. Michael Baden, Chief Forensic Pathologist for New York State Police.

    • caroline

      Out of 11 MI6 officers based in Paris at the time of the crash, only one was cross-examined and his identity was withheld from the Inquest jury.
      A strong string of circumstantial evidence and documentary evidence points to the three most senior officers being replaced by Sherad Cowper Coles, Dr. Valery Caton and Richard Spearman in the days preceeding the crash. Caton and Coles were not heard from at the Inquest, Spearman was heard from but never identified to the Jury. ????

      “It is time to separate Diana irrevocably from the core of the Monachy which had earlier been so ready to embrace her” – lead article in the magazine of the Tory “Way Foreward Group” ( President: Margaret Thatcher) , June 1996).

    • caroline

      Why was it important to Balmoral that the embalming be carried out in France ?
      The French company, PFG, has been ordered via Kenyons to do the embalming. But as a precautionary messaure, the Royal Funeral directors, Levertons, also had been told to make sure Diana was embalmed before bringing her back to the UK.
      Princess Diana, was not at the time of her death, a member of the Royal Family.

      On 31 august 1997, the Queen welcomed the dead princess Diana back into the Royal fold. Not only did she authorise the immidiate use of Levertons, the Royal undertakers, but she also ordered the use of the Royal Standard to be placed on the coffin inside the Paris hospital.
      Then to further confirm this in the minds of the public,she despacthed her son Charles to Paris to accompany Diana´s body back to London. This was never about Diana´s wishes but the Queen agenda to control Diana´s dead body.

      The reality is that the embalming was illegal. No documentation was completed. There was no authorisation and Princess Diana´s family were not consulted, as is required under French Law.
      Monceau didnt want the press and world to know what went on the room. He started putting black tape on the blinds to prevent the press form getting any information about what was just about to occur – the Paris embalming of Princess Diana. They increased the heat in the room = decomposition = embalming.

      Normal practice for dead bodies is that they are removed into the refrigerated morgue. Princess Diana´s body was moved into the non-air conditioned room 1.006 on the first floor of the hospital. Her body was left to bake in the room for the next 5.5 hours, deteriorating rapidly. The prime goal is the deterioration. This is the excuse for her embalming. Jean Monceau claimed he was waiting for autohorisation but the problem is that the three people he claims he got authorisation from denies it.

      Martine Monteil, the head of the Brigade Criminelle: ” I do not have any recollection of a conversation with Monsieur Monceau, the embalmer”. Personal from PFG have also denied speaking to him, as has Massoni, Prefect of police.
      There was a liason between Jean Monceau and Malcom Ross in Scotland. The strange thing is, that Monceau is a far more experienced embalmer than Hugette Amarger, who Monceau demanded do the embalming and she wondered why she was chosen.

    • caroline

      “Dry ice should have been applied to Diana´s body, which was described by nurses as “melting”, but it never was” – Hugette Amarger, french embalmer.

      Why was Diana´s body treated much worse than if she had been an ordinary citizen ?

      “There was a panic on. Monceau told me to be quick because Prince Charles was arriving”. As a result of the pressure and conditions forced on Amarger “the embalming had been done particulary badly……it seemed as though it had been done in a hurry” – R. Thomsen.

    • caroline

      The Queen reinstated Diana as a Royal so she could take control over her dead body. This allowed her to control the UK post-mortem and the samples taken and the later Inquest. These actions allowed the royal coronar, John Burton, to illegally take control of Diana´s body as soon as it arrived back in the UK. The legal process was for the body to be controlled by the coronar in the area of her anticipated burial, Althorp as decided by the Spencer family – that was the coronar of Nothhamptonshire.

      The Queen was indifferent to where Diana was burried, Her sole short term was for control of the post-mortem and the samples.Anything after that, including the funeral arrangements was of lesser consequence.The Queen´s 3.30 a.m. order for the French embalming of Diana was passed from Malcom Ross, though Kenyons in London, to PFG in France. The embalming was illegal. There was no authorisation and Diana´s family was not consulted, as is required under French Law.

    • caroline

      Just as Hugette Amarger was commencing the embalming in Paris the Queen and other royals were arriving for the Sunday service at Crathie Church near Balmoral. Despite Diana dying earlier that morning her name was not to be mentioned and no prayers were to be spoken in her remembrance. The minister instead gave his original sermon about the joys of moving house, including jokes by Billy Connolly – even though Diana´s grieving sons, William and Harry, were in attendance.

      I believe the Queen authorized the assassination.
      Just 39 days after the last WAG meeting Princess Diana lay dead in a Paris hospital.
      We have to remember that Diana´s anti landmine activities troubled other countries like France and USA. Tony Blair would definately have passed this on to the Queen, at their weekly meetings. There were intergovernmental discussion about this after Diana´s well published trip to Angola, january 12th, 1997. The plan to eliminate Diana was taken on 23. july.1997.

    • caroline

      :roll: Where are my comments on the Diana assassination ?

      • Sheriff of Knottinghole

        they are all here it would seem…. and thank you for your research….

      • Daughter of the Church

        Caroline, your series of comments is a real prodigy! While reading, I couldn’t keep-up with your postings! Could you do the same for other great conspiracy-caused crimes such as 911, JFK, etc?

        As for the actual murder of Lady Diana, being postmortem reinstated Royal, your dossier seem irrefutable: the princess died in the ambulance which had become an execution chamber operated by goons.

        As an additional comment, if I may speak of the vehicular aspect of the murder. The Mercedes Benz automobile was a service car to the Hotel in which Diana resided. This car had been freshly returned from maintenance. A sophisticated form of preemptive sabotage upon the doom vehicle is suspected, such as a tempering against the servo steering system. Meaning that the steering could be have been remotely controlled. The technology existed at that time, and was most certainly in the hand of any secret services organisation.
        The doomed automobile could have been suddenly steered into any direction, as any given time by a following team of assassin. Assassins being close enough to the doomed vehicle, such as riders on a motorcycle who steered the vehicle at a chosen spot, while at the same instant blinding its driver with a light flash.
        The assassins of the vehicular part in the murder of Lady Diana, were the riders on the bike. The rest of the hit team was in the ambulance.
        It is a strong accusation, which could hold if incriminating evidences were found upon the doomed Mercedes. This is where the intrigue goes deeper.
        Was the doomed MBZ being inspected? An inspection result of the MBZ of after the crash was never made public. In fact Mercedes Benz manufacturing flew a team of their own engineer from Stuttgart to Paris for an inspection of the car. It was logical, since Benz was involved in a high visibility car accident which involved one of its product. The inspectors send from Stuttgart never got to see the vehicle. One more cover-up? You bet!

    • Anonymous

      I remember at the time the EMTs testified that they had to try for FORTY-FIVE minutes calling the Palace and the Queen for “PERMISSION TO TREAT,” but the Queen wouldn’t come to the phone.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.