Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Next Big Future (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Summary of the Diet and Health Ideas of Karl Denninger

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


A guest post by Joseph Friedlander
Warning: a long article, (3500 words or so) with opinions (not all of them mine!) . A quick summary is available below if you don’t like controversy.
Summary:  Karl Denninger’s key finding is that fast to digest carbohydrates can act as an addictive drug and even slow to digest carbohydrates can hugely boost hunger while a moderate protein and fat to taste diet with very low carbs kills your hunger and results in satiation at below maintenance levels for overweight:  And thus causes reasonably rapid net weight loss.

 Once detoxed from carb addiction your body finds a healthy weight and maintains it with almost no active effort.

Those trying to follow official government recommendations of a low fat, higher carb diet are torn by hunger for more carbs, usually overeat (if part of the bell curve of people having trouble controlling carb hunger) and end up overweight.  

Enough systemic overeating and overweight poisons the body’s insulin response and can result in diabetes, heart problems and other such troubles.

By giving inappropriate advice, Denninger believes the government/medical/industrial complex has caused many many deaths.

Denninger also believes that many substances used heavily for food additives since World War I (and certainly World War 2) such as hydrogenated oils, synthetic additives etc are not as safe as the government and the food industry would have us believe and result in cravings and bodily damage. He recommends butter over margarine, olive oil over seed oils, etc. 


(end summary)
Karl Denninger’s site market-ticker.org has carried some of his amateur scientific work (ironically he might not regard it as such) in redefining what really works and what is probably professionally generated nonsense in the areas of diet, weight loss and exercise.
 I ran across his site while searching for other data, but his various articles concerning diet and health, exercise and fitness are probably worthy of summary here all on their own.
This Next Big Future blog covers topics related to the future and of course while it is fun to speculate about the futures that will happen long after you are dead, it is even more fun to live long enough to encounter them yourself, in good health (and not perched up like a wheezing land whale on an electric cart).
So a certain minimum good personal health and fitness are relevant even to NBF readers.
Given that your body has a certain natural expiration date, abuse and overweight can easily pull the plug decades early. And as you age you tend to slow down and pounds (and kilos) crawl on, so sooner or later, even if you are young now, this will be of interest.
Karl’s articles outlining his experimental process where he cut through official claims and disregarded apparently very formidable looking governmental pronouncements are a manifestation of the meaning of the old Royal Society motto, ‘nullius in verba” (nothing in mere words), or to quote the Royal Society history page https://royalsociety.org/about-us/history/
The Royal Society’s motto ‘Nullius in verba’ roughly translates as ‘take nobody’s word for it’. It is an expression of the determination of Fellows to withstand the domination of authority and to verify all statements by an appeal to facts determined by experiment.

Wiki on the Royal Society. A key part of the history of the first age of science. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society
The ‘invisible college’ of people trading real health and exercise experimental data back and forth across the internet around the gridlocked peer-reviewed mess that may have killed many people through generations of bad dietary advice is a throwback to an earlier scientific age and –perhaps—a harbinger of a third debureaucratized age of science.
This might sound like an extreme reaction to one guy’s before and after diet pictures and a description of the process by which he figured out what was going on with his body (why weight gain when following official advice was nearly inevitable, and why something against official guidelines worked)—but given the vast epidemic of obesity and diabetes which is probably taking millions of lives a year world wide (because many other countries follow the US Government lead) —it is literally a life and death issue of sorts.
 If we had a air traffic control system that allowed merely a thousand people a year to die needlessly you would not hear the end of it. Why should a health advice governmental/scientific structure that results in such mortality rates not be fair game for modification?
(Dr. Bruce Charlton has documented the sort of peer review gridlock that may have produced the official pronouncements that Karl Denninger has (in his own person) operationally disproved—in his mini-book http://thestoryofscience.blogspot.co.il/

Sample quote :

Credit is given for the mere act of a ‘peer reviewed’ publication regardless of whether the stuff is true and useful – or false and harmful. 

It has been since supplemented by this newer edition: http://corruption-of-science.blogspot.co.uk/
Sample quote:
Hence the vast structures of personnel and resources that constitute modern ‘science’ are not real science but instead merely a professional research bureaucracy, thus fake or pseudo-science; regulated by peer review (that is, committee opinion) rather than the search-for and service-to reality. Among the consequences are that modern publications in the research literature must be assumed to be worthless or misleading and should always be ignored.

Dr. Charlton places the end of the first age of science around 1950, in the several generations since then the official structures (and funding) have grown beyond dreams, but we have not reaped comparable gains. See http://corruption-of-science.blogspot.co.uk/for Dr. Charlton’s feelings why not. )
I have appended the data on Dr. Charlton’s hypothesis here simply because my first reaction to official governmental dietary recommendations such as thesehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_USDA_nutrition_guidesbeing WRONG was utter disbelief.
When I was a kid (1960s) I heard statements along the line of, ‘the government knows best’,  ‘the government knows what is doing’, ‘let government experts handle it and let the amateurs go home’ and so forth.

 Individuals can make mistakes, even go bad, but huge incorruptible government organizations?  How could such a thing happen?   (Hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture  Better to believe that it was impossible…
The disbelief was akin to the idea that the government would deliberately misstate true levels of unemployment and inflation in real cost of living for its own convenience. Release false statistics?
 Perhaps not intentionally. But with enough twisting of facts (a guy unemployed 5 years is no longer considered unemployed; soaring prices in what you would eat aren’t really inflation if you will substitute equivalents) the official version no longer matches reality.
Something like that has happened in the official dietary advice (the old food pyramid etc) and in the peer reviewed publications. 
I hope to follow this article up with a future one detailing my own diet process. Until I read Denninger I never understood why I could lose weight (serious amounts about 5 times in my lifetime) yet it always came back. Now I know the mechanism by which the fat creeps back, (carb generated hunger spikes) and thanks to Karl for pointing it out.
Now on to a summary of Karl Denninger’s points, often condensed here to save space and to ease the reader’s task. (And frankly, Karl sometimes uses impertinent language so don’t follow the links unless prepared to be sandblasted with rough words sometimes….)
In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)
  • Denninger, with pictures, shows his 60 lb loss from 210 to 150, and comments how his lifestyle change does not change back after years and no he has not put the weight back on. 
  • What he is saying is, if you aim to get out of an obesity state, you can’t just ‘go on a diet’ and then go off it, you have to change the way you eat.
In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)
  • The so-called “food pyramid” was never created by scientific inquiry – but with what Karl charges was agribusiness influence and outright government corruption.
  • Fat in food does not make you fat.   It calms body hunger.
  • Easily-digested carbohydrates, make you fat because the body can only have so much glycogen in reserve at one time.  After that, it goes straight to fat to keep you from dying from excess blood sugar.
  • The consequent insulin response makes you hungry after eating carbs. If the bag of pretzels is still there you probably will finish it.
  • People who eat low carb all the time have low glycogen reserves and no hunger. This shows that it’s the carb spike that leads to hunger response, not the hunger response to glycogen reserve level.
  • If you eat when glycogen reserves are full, it goes, as stated above, straight to fat.
  • The low fat version of foods with extra tasty carbs (sugar, corn syrup, grains etc) will make you first ravenous and then fat. Counter-intuitive but easily testable.
  •  Processed seed and vegetable oils  very high in Omega-6 fatty acids are a new thing on a mass scale in the last hundred years or so and can cause systemic inflammation in the body.  This is very bad if the inflammation is in your coronary arteries.  Many post World War 2 food solutions are charged by Mr Denninger  to be essentially slow poisons.
  •  (Link to outside essay on these oils http://www.thescreamonline.com/essays/essays5-1/vegoil.html)
  •  You can’t count calories accurately enough to maintain your weight. But your body can and will unless you mess it up with chemicals and carb related strike-counterstrike phenomenae.
  •   A pound of body fat is around 3600 calories. If off counting by 100 calories a day (impossible outside a controlled lab setting) you could gain a pound of fat a month or so. After 10 years you could gain 100 lbs—or the reverse, you might suddenly look alarmingly thin.
  •  This does not happen if you eat a diet that does not blow away the body’s ability to regulate your eating through hunger and satiety signals.
  •   Mr Denninger’s weight has not varied more than 5 pounds in 3 years—and he does not count calories. He just has a list of foods he won’t eat, and he eats according to his rules whenever he is hungry.  This is a net accuracy of 20-50 calories a day, impossible on a conscious level essentially proving his point.
  •   A normal body has just a teaspoon of sugar in the blood stream at any time.


  • In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)
  •   Denninger’s diet cuts back most carbohydrates and grains,  (0 to 100 grams of carbs a day usually under 50—and never fast carbs like bread and sugar.
  •    Results included drastically reduced hunger. Especially when Karl ate more saturated fats, which he regards as perfectly healthy despite official pronouncements and gives evidence in his writings.
  •    He eliminated vegetable and hydrogenated fats except olive oil.
  •   In his belief fast carbs are an addictive drug.
  •   This addiction leads to obesity, which can in extreme forms cause damage to the insulin response system, possible diabetes, amputation, blindness and death in extreme cases.  Drugs can slow this (at vast expense) but not shield against it. 
  •   Eating right can stop new damage slowly cumulative damage may be partially healed.  But you will be in much better health as age sets in and benefit accordingly.

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=229286

  •        Denninger (paraphrased):          “The lipid hypothesis, that cardiovascular disease was caused by high serum (that is, blood) cholesterol levels and that was caused by eating a high-fat diet which is the predicate upon which all “cholesterol modification” therapies rest is at best questionable.”
  •         Quote: “Since there are only three forms of food — carbohydrate, protein and fat, if you eat less fat you must eat more of either protein or carbohydrate.  Very large amounts of protein are both extremely expensive and known to be tough on the kidneys, so the shift was obvious — toward carbohydrates.  The agricultural lobby pressed for and furthered this and then added on to it extremely cheap sweeteners such as high-fructose corn syrup.  You see, when you remove fat from food it tends to taste like cardboard, so sugar in its various forms was substituted.”

In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)

  •   Type 2 diabetes has a strong correlation with obesity which appears to be triggered by consuming more than a very minimal amount of fast carbs like grains sugars etc.
  •   The US Government has promoted consumption of these very carbs,  including high-fructose corn syrup, which functionally is like an addictive drug for a considerable percentage of the  population.
  •    Indeed the very suggestion of going to a near zero carb diet causes panic, people literally say they ‘can’t give up their carbs’.  But not, its’s not addictive, why would you say that?
  •     Some near diabetic people who have gotten carbs out of their diets have entirely stabilized their blood sugar without drugs.
  • In the comments here:
  •   Reader Toujourpret volunteers it takes about 2 weeks for the carb to no-carb transition to occur. You go through hell those first 2 weeks but it is worth it once you break through. The hunger goes away and the pounds drop off.
  •   Karl:  ”White rice has a glycemic index of approximately 90, which is damn close to table sugar and worse (materially so) than a waffle, white bread or soda crackers! Indeed, it’s HIGHER in glycemic index than a cheese pizza and roughly the same in this regard as mashed potatoes.”
  •   The classical Asian peasant diet of rice (just enough to keep hunger at bay but not away) with near zero fat –is commented on. Not having more they didn’t overeat, despite the addictive nature of carbs.  In the prosperity of the last decades, with much more rice (and fat to fry it in) being available even to the less well off Asian, obesity and diabetes has exploded.
  •  A high fat diet is self regulating (you get satiated) a high carb diet is addictive and essentially a gateway to overeating, obesity and health problems.
  •  Reader Jackl comments that in the ancient feast and famine economy, the availability of carbs and the carb hunger spike were the signal to store food for the next starvation season—but now we carb feast 12/365 and wonder why we get weight problems.
  •   Outside link to a couple that rowed across the Pacific on a high fat diet and were almost never hungry –amazingly their hunger went away because of the ‘fat hunger off switch’ of satiation. http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/excursions/post/husband-wife-row-pacific-ocean-high-fat-diet/


http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=229092

In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)

  • If those with Type 2 diabetes dropped carbs from their diet except for 100 grams a day with less than 10 of that being sugar starch and grains (ie fast carbohydrates) and 90 grams or more in green vegetables most would stop being obese and would have sugar levels drop to near or (actual normal) and most literally would not require much if any medication.
  
  • Before insulin, people would  consume less than 8% of total caloric load from carbs and most of the rest from fat.  The alternative was to die.Eat zero or near-zero carbohydrates and instead do eat high fat, moderate-protein with the balance being green vegetables such that you consume 8% of your total dietary caloric load from carbohydrate and most of the rest from fat.

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=225953

      In this article, Karl makes these points: (Paraphrased)

        • The human state in nature 5,000 years ago influences our relationship between body and food today
        • There were seasons for food, vegetables and fruits were varying and unreliable, protein and fats were constant (hunting)
        • Synthetic chemicals were obviously unknown,  Quote:” no transfats, no vegetable oils, no hydrogenated anything and no processed grains of any sort.  In other words all of the things that spike your insulin response today did not exist — all of the so-called “fast carbohydrates” are modern inventions. In other words the insulin spike caused by modern eating is biologically abnormal. Want to fight God?  Go right ahead….”
        • Karl was losing athletic ability a few years ago, body mass and waistline increasing etc.  A clear path to overweight and dysfunction in old age.
        • He had a long history of heel striking when running, a spare tire while eating normally, and all the ‘professional’ and ‘official advice was useless. He could govern himself with diligence and force a temporary diet and burst of exercise and go down 10 lbs but when he followed the experts’ advice he regained whatever he lost.
        • He came to the conclusion that 210 pounds had to become 150 pounds or he weas going to be 300 pounds by the time he was 70.
        • He knew that the human body does not react to the kind of standard advice being given out by professionals who assert they know what they are doing and are using governmental regulations.
        • What they are trying to recommend simply does not work. It fights the way the body reacts.  Most diets fail because of this.  You are fighting the way the body is wired.
        • When you eat items with a high glycemic index (grains, sugars, other fast carbs) your body spikes insulin production and the system is stressed, being forced to stockpile fat to lower blood sugar.
        • Your hunger response is not abated by this stockpile of fat: You don’t receive a hunger off signal.  It amplifies the amounts of things you eat that you were not designed to eat.
        • Quote from Karl:
        • “How did I figure this out?  I started thinking for myself and integrating what we all learn and in fact know to be true and when that conflicted with the so-called “conventional wisdom” I decided to err on the side of that which we had scientifically proved instead of what someone with a lot of letters after their name was pontificating on.”

        • In other words, ‘Nullius in verba’ –an actual scientific attitude (see top of article).
        • Not only did Karl recast the dietary advice he got but also the shoe selection advice he got from experts— the so-called “running shoes” were trying to prevent the very heel striking  that gave him signal feedback to avoid the true cause of the hurt to his legs, the shock loads hitting the joints instead of the calf muscles.  He got (modified quote) “”Five Fingers” shoes (that avoided this problem—JF) and began the “Couch to 5k” program” …I got rid of all processed foods and began eating a high-fat, low-carbohydrate (vegetables and a few fruits only), moderate-protein diet.  No hydrogenated anything, no sugars, no processed grains.  The simple filter before it went down the pie hole was this: if it didn’t exist 5,000 years ago don’t eat it.”
        The results picture at http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=229072speaks for itself.
        In summary, most people try to lose weight by making a high-maintenance strainful diet  according to the advice of the experts which reaps quick weight loss gains but is almost certainly too much effort to maintain especially once the weight goal has been attained (or when work stress hits, etc).  When the ‘thin behavior’ faking goes away, the fat reforms onto the body.
           By constrast, what Karl Denninger did was make a true low maintenance lifestyle change– he altered his fat-causing behavior and the resultant fat melted away in less than a year and it has kept off from years since—and he literally does not count calories but eats when hungry and stops when full. 
            The test of a theory is the power to predict.  Someone who follows the official advice is a very poor prospect to lose weight and keep it off. Someone who follows Denninger’s dietary advice and makes a lifestyle change in terms of eating habits will tend to keep thin effortlessly.
             What would be fun would be an official governmental study with a third of the participants following official governmental dietary advice, a third for a control group, and a third following Karl’s prescription. If honestly run, it would probably prove that the perfect diet (by government standards) that you don’t or can’t stick to is the enemy of the good diet that gets you where you want to go.

        Read more »


        Source: http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/09/summary-of-diet-and-health-ideas-of.html



        Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

        Anyone can join.
        Anyone can contribute.
        Anyone can become informed about their world.

        "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

        Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


        Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

        Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

        Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


        Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

        HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

        Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

        MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

        Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

        Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

        Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

        Report abuse

          Comments

          Your Comments
          Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

          MOST RECENT
          Load more ...

          SignUp

          Login

          Newsletter

          Email this story
          Email this story

          If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

          If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.