Active or Passive Censorship?

Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc.

In some responses to my Skeptics piece, a few disclaimers knock me for linking some articles here, at this blog, by persons whom skeptics dislike (even hate).

I won’t name the persons under attack, but will say that some of the links I include here so not reflect my views or likes but should be noted if they impact others in some way or another.

At my Facebook MediaWatch page, I let a few Trumpsters have their say, and allowed oppositioners to thwart those views as they felt necessary to do so.

Here, among the UFO crowd, there are differing views, even non-views, that the skeptics present, and if I’m asked to link a view I don’t necessarily agree with, I’ll do so, if the piece is somewhat sensible and juicy.

(I do not post diatribes, certainly those that provide attacks on me. Who would allow someone to throw mud on their person, a masochist?)

So, while not a” live and let live” person necessarily, I do think many views about open questions in some areas of thought need an airing now and then.

(And while skeptic Gilles Fernandez accused me of using ad hominems in my skeptic spiel, I didn’t. Ad hominems attack a person. I slammed skeptical ideology and ideas not the guys proposing them, just their loony positions. But it was a nice try by Gilles.)

N.B. Image atop from https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/guide-to-online-censorship/

RR

http://ufocon.blogspot.com – The UFO Iconoclast(s)