As California Tyrants Sought To Punish Doctors Telling The Truth About The CONvids, Judge Blocks Their Pretended Legislation

In the grievances cited in The Declaration of Independence, those who came before us pointed out that the tyrant King George III engaged in “pretended Legislation” and then followed up by trying people “beyond Seas… for pretended offences.”  This is what we are facing today in the united States of America, and the state of California is one of many seeking to silence and punish competent doctors who are speaking out against the establishment, Big Pharma, the DC crime syndicate and their corporate fascist buddies concerning the CONvid-1984.  Fortunately, a judge ruled at the end of January that the tyrants’ pretended legislation that sought to punish doctors for telling the truth, under the guise of “misinformation,” had no merit and blocked it.

Reclaim the Net has the story.

A federal judge questioned the new California law that penalizes doctors for sharing COVID-19 “misinformation.”

• How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
• Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Get Free Shipping With Promo Code TIM
• Build Your Own Food Forest & Save 5% With Promo Code TIMBROWN
• Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
• Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
• Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
• Save Up To 66% Off MyPillow with Promo Code TIMBROWN
• Grab guns, accessories, gear and optics at the lowest prices

The new law, which came into effect on January 1 this year, prohibits doctors from spreading what the state deems to be misinformation to patients, or risk being penalized for “unprofessional conduct,” which could result in their licenses being revoked.

Here’s a summary of the case so far if you’re not up to date.

The law has been challenged through separate lawsuits filed by two organizations and a group of doctors on the grounds of First Amendment violations. They filed a motion at the US District Court of Sacramento to hold the law until the cases are concluded.

In a hearing, Senior Judge William Shubb described the law’s definition of misinformation as “nonsense.”

We obtained a copy of the order for you here.

“Because AB 2098 [the misinformation law] implicates [plaintiff’s] First Amendment right to receive information, she has standing,” the court wrote.

“Vague statutes are particularly objectionable when they involve sensitive areas of First Amendment freedoms because they operate to inhibit the exercise of those freedoms,” the court added, referring to a 2001 case, California Teachers Association v. State Board of Education.

“When the challenged law implicates First Amendment rights, a facial challenge based on vagueness is appropriate.”

The court granted the plaintiffs a hearing to challenge the law and blocked the enforcement of the law until the case is decided.

The law defines misinformation as “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.”

Shubb noted that “standard of care” is not a new principle, but argued, “contemporary scientific consensus” is.

According to Deputy Attorney General Kristin Liska, who is representing Gov. Gavin Newsom, a medical professional has to violate all three aspects of the definition of misinformation for punishment to be applicable; share misinformation, contradict scientific consensus, and go against the standard of care.

However, she refused to give examples of statements that would fit the definition, saying that it would depend on the circumstances. Shubb then asked how she expects medical professionals to know what would violate the law.

This all brings to mind the great little quote for Mel Gibson’s character in The Patriot when he asked, “Why should I trade 1 tyrant 3,000 miles away for 3,000 one mile away?”

Friends, we have done just that!  It’s time we required justice on these wicked tyrants’ heads in every state, not just in California.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media