2012: Denying chemtrails is dangerous for your health

Scientists and governments have allowed some “limited hangouts” (partial disclosures) on chemtrails or stratospheric geo-engineering, framing it as “experimental.” They openly discuss geo-engineering as “potential” solutions for weather control and protection against global warming.

Apparently, they’ve been doing a lot of open “experimenting” since the early 1990s. They don’t really have to deny much. There’s plenty of denial from those on the ground who don’t look up to see anything different. Or upon noticing chemtrails, they will argue that they are contrails.
There are even internet pages devoted to “scientifically” debunking chemtrails as erroneous conspiracy theories, similar to “Quackwatch” sites that go after medical practitioners who successfully treat disease without drugs.

The obvious differences between chemtrails and contrails

Contrails are harmless and dissipate quickly. They don’t linger. They usually extend from 20 to 50 plane lengths behind the aircraft. They are very white and somewhat thinly textured. Sometimes high altitude planes can be seen as silver specks without any trail at all. Chemtrails, however, are very different.
Chemtrails often extend from one horizon to the other. They tend to be thicker and wider than contrails, and their white plumes can be tainted with slight discolorations. Chemtrails linger for hours or whole days.

Read More