Taboo Truths: The Missiles of 9/11

Continued from “Taboo Truths: Clues Avoided by the 9/11 Truth Movement.”  

I’m hearing a lot about fake news these days, that we need to beware of fake news on the Internet.

The irony is bitter, because this warning is coming from the masters of fake news, the media outlets like CBS, ABC, NBC, and the New York Times; the very propaganda organs, that for the last 16 years or so, have been looking us in the eye and telling us that mostly hollow aluminum jets can bore through concrete, burrow into the ground, and sever structural steel box columns, like a hot knife through butter.

All it takes is to scratch the surface of 9/11, to realize just about everything peddled about that fateful day was, and is indeed, “fake,” but it’s not just the authorities pushing fake news, even the 9/11 Truth Movement prefers fake truth, rather than the real thing.  In fact the rank and file within the truth movement seem quite content with the belief that the truth will never be known, which makes me wonder why they call it a truth movement in the first place.

In my 15-minute video “What cut the plane shaped hole” I discussed some of the evidence the truth movement ignores, but in retrospect I should have named it, “What couldn’t have cut the plane shaped hole?,” because I focus on evidence that eliminates planes, as well as planted explosives alone (and by extension “holograms”), as being responsible.  As a followup to that video, in this post, I will explore what could have caused it, but first I should note that the information referenced herein is available to anyone with Internet access, so it is disappointing to learn nobody in the 9/11 Truth Movement has already investigated it.  In fact, truthers, and true believers alike, still treat it as if it doesn’t exist.  Usually, when confronted with this information, they very quickly turn on me, by questioning my motives, sanity and intelligence, but rarely do they address the evidence that leads me to my conclusions.  If this was a real crime scene investigation, the act of “reconstructing the crime,” would be critical; every clue, no matter how small, would be collected, and used as a basis for the formulation of a theory.  But truthers don’t do that.  They skip right to the theory, and then look for supporting evidence, ignoring those clues that don’t fit, an activity known as, “cherry-picking,” not, “truth-seeking.”

If you’re like me, and just want to follow the evidence wherever it leads, then the details discussed in this post can lead directly to the most likely cause, and the most likely suspects.  If I’m wrong, then there must be a better explanation for it, and I want to hear what that is, but so far the response has been silence.  It is as the late Harold Pinter described, how Americans react when they hear “real news,” about all the atrocities committed by the USA, around the world, since the end of World War II:

“It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.”

It is this hypnosis that has kept the war on terror going strong, with both sides so entranced, they will reject the evidence that can lead to the truth, in favor of fantastical explanations straight out of Gene Roddenberry’s imagination.  The truth is, no, planes can’t slice steel, and, no, buildings don’t turn to dust, in the real world.  For 16 years both sides (all sides), have bent over backwards to avoid the first step in any investigation; the scene of the crime, probably, partly because it makes most of the truth movement’s hypotheses irrelevant, but also because of the staggering implications that accompany it.

Years ago, a friend warned me that even if I did discover the truth about 9/11, nobody will give a damn, a prescient prediction.  Not that I’m saying I’m right, but I have done my best to keep myself honest in my investigation, and although I am often wrong, I am also often not wrong.  All I can say is, the fact that no one will address these clues is exactly what I would expect from controlled opposition, if I did stumble on the right path

Fake news is everywhere, but from what I can tell most people like it that way, truthers included, which is a pity.  The truth may hurt, but it really does set you free.

Full article here:

http://yankee451.com/?p=4147